• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

通过锥形束计算机断层扫描评估下颌正中联合区域正畸微型种植体植入的最佳部位

Evaluation of Optimal Sites for the Insertion of Orthodontic Mini Implants at Mandibular Symphysis Region through Cone-Beam Computed Tomography.

作者信息

Zhang Shizhen, Wei Xiaoyu, Wang Lufei, Wu Zhouqiang, Liu Lu, Yan Xinyu, Lai Wenli, Long Hu

机构信息

State Key Laboratory of Oral Diseases, National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases, Department of Orthodontics, West China Hospital of Stomatology, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China.

Department of Oral and Craniofacial Health Sciences, University of North Carolina Adams School of Dentistry, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA.

出版信息

Diagnostics (Basel). 2022 Jan 23;12(2):285. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics12020285.

DOI:10.3390/diagnostics12020285
PMID:35204375
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8871083/
Abstract

This study aims to evaluate the overall bone thickness (OBT) and cortical bone thickness (CBT) of mandibular symphysis and to determine the optimal sites for the insertion of orthodontic mini implants. Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) images of 32 patients were included in this study. The sample was further categorized into three facial types: low-, average-, and high-angle. OBT and CBT were measured at the mandibular symphysis region. All measurements were performed at six different heights from the cementoenamel junction [CEJ] and at seven different angles to the occlusal plane. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used for statistical comparison and a value less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Our results revealed that neither OBT nor CBT was influenced by age or sex, except for the observation that CBT was significantly greater in adults than in adolescents. OBT and CBT were significantly greater in low-angle cases than in average- and high-angle cases. Both OBT and CBT were significantly influenced by insertion locations, heights and angles, and their interactions. CBT and OBT were greatest at the location between two lower central incisors, and became greater with increases in insertion height and angle. Both recommended and optimal insertion sites were mapped. The mandibular symphysis region was suitable for the placement of orthodontic mini implants. The optimal insertion site was 6-10 mm apical to the CEJ between two lower central incisors, with an insertion angle being 0-60 degrees to the occlusal plane.

摘要

本研究旨在评估下颌联合处的整体骨厚度(OBT)和皮质骨厚度(CBT),并确定正畸微型种植体植入的最佳部位。本研究纳入了32例患者的锥形束计算机断层扫描(CBCT)图像。样本进一步分为三种面型:低角、平均角和高角。在下颌联合区域测量OBT和CBT。所有测量均在距牙骨质釉质界[CEJ]的六个不同高度以及与咬合平面的七个不同角度进行。采用方差分析(ANOVA)进行统计比较,P值小于0.05被认为具有统计学意义。我们的结果显示,OBT和CBT均不受年龄或性别的影响,不过观察到成人的CBT显著大于青少年。低角病例的OBT和CBT显著大于平均角和高角病例。OBT和CBT均受植入位置、高度和角度及其相互作用的显著影响。CBT和OBT在两颗下中切牙之间的位置最大,并随着植入高度和角度的增加而增大。绘制了推荐的和最佳的植入部位。下颌联合区域适合放置正畸微型种植体。最佳植入部位是在两颗下中切牙之间的CEJ根尖6 - 10毫米处,植入角度与咬合平面呈0 - 60度。

相似文献

1
Evaluation of Optimal Sites for the Insertion of Orthodontic Mini Implants at Mandibular Symphysis Region through Cone-Beam Computed Tomography.通过锥形束计算机断层扫描评估下颌正中联合区域正畸微型种植体植入的最佳部位
Diagnostics (Basel). 2022 Jan 23;12(2):285. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics12020285.
2
Optimal sites and angles for the insertion of orthodontic mini-implants at infrazygomatic crest: a cone beam computed tomography (CBCT)-based study.颧下嵴处正畸微型种植体植入的最佳部位和角度:一项基于锥形束计算机断层扫描(CBCT)的研究
Am J Transl Res. 2022 Dec 15;14(12):8893-8902. eCollection 2022.
3
Evaluation of Optimal Insertion Sites and Angles for Orthodontic Mini-Implants at the Anterior Nasal Spine Region Based on Cone-Beam Computed Tomography.基于锥形束计算机断层扫描评估鼻前棘区域正畸微型种植体的最佳植入部位和角度
J Clin Med. 2024 Feb 1;13(3):837. doi: 10.3390/jcm13030837.
4
Bone and cortical bone thickness of mandibular buccal shelf for mini-screw insertion in adults.成人下颌颊棚区微型种植体植入的骨与皮质骨厚度。
Angle Orthod. 2017 Sep;87(5):745-751. doi: 10.2319/011117-34.1. Epub 2017 Jun 9.
5
Three-dimensional Evaluation of Interradicular Areas and Cortical Bone Thickness for Orthodontic Miniscrew Implant Placement Using Cone-beam Computed Tomography.使用锥形束计算机断层扫描对正畸微螺钉种植体植入的根间区域和皮质骨厚度进行三维评估。
J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2020 Aug;12(Suppl 1):S99-S104. doi: 10.4103/jpbs.JPBS_36_20. Epub 2020 Aug 28.
6
Cone-Beam Computed Tomographic Assessment of Bone Thickness in the Mandibular Anterior Region for Application of Orthodontic Mini-Screws.用于正畸微螺钉植入的下颌前部区域骨厚度的锥形束计算机断层扫描评估
Turk J Orthod. 2021 Jun;34(2):102-108. doi: 10.5152/TurkJOrthod.2021.20070.
7
Assessment of Bone Thickness at the Infra Zygomatic Crest Region for Various Orthodontic Miniscrew Implant (OMSI) Insertion Angles: A Cone-Beam Computed Tomographic Study.不同正畸微螺钉种植体(OMSI)植入角度下颧下嵴区域骨厚度的评估:一项锥形束计算机断层扫描研究。
Turk J Orthod. 2024 Jun 30;37(2):104-111. doi: 10.4274/TurkJOrthod.2023.2023.14.
8
Optimal sites for mini-implant insertion in the lingual or palatal alveolar cortical bone as assessed by cone beam computed tomography in South Indian population.通过锥形束计算机断层扫描评估的印度南部人群舌侧或腭侧牙槽皮质骨中微型种植体插入的最佳部位。
Orthod Craniofac Res. 2021 Feb;24(1):121-129. doi: 10.1111/ocr.12415. Epub 2020 Aug 20.
9
Evaluation of interdental space of the maxillary posterior area for orthodontic mini-implants with cone-beam computed tomography.使用锥形束计算机断层扫描评估上颌后牙区正畸微型种植体的牙间隙
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2009 May;135(5):635-41. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2007.06.013.
10
A Custom-Made Orthodontic Mini-Implant-Effect of Insertion Angle and Cortical Bone Thickness on Stress Distribution with a Complex In Vitro and In Vivo Biosafety Profile.定制正畸微型种植体——植入角度和皮质骨厚度对应力分布的影响以及复杂的体外和体内生物安全性概况
Materials (Basel). 2020 Oct 27;13(21):4789. doi: 10.3390/ma13214789.

本文引用的文献

1
Interradicular distance and alveolar bone thickness for miniscrew insertion: a CBCT study of Persian adults with different sagittal skeletal patterns.不同矢状骨面型的伊朗成年人的 miniscrew 植入的根尖间距和牙槽骨厚度:CBCT 研究。
BMC Oral Health. 2021 Oct 17;21(1):534. doi: 10.1186/s12903-021-01891-8.
2
Assessment of available sites for palatal orthodontic mini-implants through cone-beam computed tomography.通过锥形束计算机断层扫描评估腭部正畸微种植体的可用部位。
Angle Orthod. 2020 Jul 1;90(4):516-523. doi: 10.2319/070719-457.1.
3
Effects of cortical bone thickness and trabecular bone density on primary stability of orthodontic mini-implants.
皮质骨厚度和松质骨密度对正畸微型种植体初期稳定性的影响。
J Dent Sci. 2019 Dec;14(4):383-388. doi: 10.1016/j.jds.2019.06.002. Epub 2019 Jul 20.
4
Effectiveness of miniscrew-supported maxillary incisor intrusion in deep-bite correction: .微螺钉支抗上颌前牙内倾在深覆合矫正中的有效性: 。
Angle Orthod. 2020 Mar;90(2):291-304. doi: 10.2319/061119-400.1. Epub 2019 Dec 9.
5
In-vitro comparison of different palatal sites for orthodontic miniscrew insertion: Effect of bone quality and quantity on primary stability.不同腭部位置用于正畸微螺钉植入的体外比较:骨质量和数量对初期稳定性的影响。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2018 Dec;154(6):809-819. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2018.02.010.
6
Histological Development of the Fused Mandibular Symphysis in the Pig.猪下颌骨联合部融合的组织学发育。
Anat Rec (Hoboken). 2019 Aug;302(8):1372-1388. doi: 10.1002/ar.23993. Epub 2018 Nov 9.
7
Extra-Alveolar Bone Screws for Conservative Correction of Severe Malocclusion Without Extractions or Orthognathic Surgery.牙槽外骨钉用于非拔牙或正颌手术的严重错颌畸形保守矫正。
Curr Osteoporos Rep. 2018 Aug;16(4):387-394. doi: 10.1007/s11914-018-0465-5.
8
Evaluation of miniscrew angulation in the posterior maxilla using cone-beam computed tomographic image.使用锥形束计算机断层扫描图像评估上颌骨后部微螺钉的角度
Dental Press J Orthod. 2018 Jan;23(1):46-55. doi: 10.1590/2177-6709.23.1.046-053.oar.
9
Influence of orthodontic mini-implant penetration of the maxillary sinus in the infrazygomatic crest region.上颌窦颊侧骨嵴区种植体植入深度对正畸支抗的影响。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2018 May;153(5):656-661. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2017.08.021.
10
Average interradicular sites for miniscrew insertion: should dental crowding be considered?微螺钉植入的平均根间部位:是否应考虑牙齿拥挤情况?
Dental Press J Orthod. 2017 Sep-Oct;22(5):90-97. doi: 10.1590/2177-6709.22.5.090-097.oar.