• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

群组 Triple P 干预对儿童和家长的效果:系统评价和荟萃分析。

Group Triple P Intervention Effects on Children and Parents: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

机构信息

Faculty of Psychology and Education Sciences, University of Porto, 4200-135 Porto, Portugal.

School of Medicine, University of Minho, 4710-057 Braga, Portugal.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Feb 13;19(4):2113. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19042113.

DOI:10.3390/ijerph19042113
PMID:35206299
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8872306/
Abstract

Supporting parents through the delivery of evidence-based parenting interventions (EBPI) is a way of promoting children's rights, given the known benefits to child development and family wellbeing. Group Triple P (GTP) is an EBPI suitable for parents of children aged 2-12 years, who experience parenting difficulties, and/or child behavior problems. Even though GTP has been intensively studied, information lacks on the magnitude of its effects, considering the risk of bias within and across prior research. To address this, a systematic review and meta-analysis (PROSPERO registration CRD42019085360) to evaluate the effects of GTP on child and parent outcomes at short- and longer-term was performed. Through a systematic search of a set of databases, 737 research papers were identified, and 11 trials were selected. The risk of bias within and across studies was evaluated. Significant positive effects of GTP were found immediately after the intervention for child behavior problems, dysfunctional parenting practices, parenting sense of competence, psychological adjustment, parental stress levels, conflict, and relationship quality. Six months after the intervention, positive effects were found only for child behavior problems. Data suggest that GTP might be an effective EBPI leading to positive family outcomes. Substantial risk of bias was found, highlighting the importance of improving the quality of research.

摘要

为父母提供循证育儿干预(EBPI)支持是促进儿童权利的一种方式,因为这种干预对儿童发展和家庭幸福有已知的益处。群体三重 P(GTP)是一种适合 2-12 岁有育儿困难和/或儿童行为问题的父母的 EBPI。尽管 GTP 已经得到了深入研究,但由于先前研究中的偏倚风险,其影响的程度信息仍然缺乏。为了解决这个问题,我们进行了一项系统评价和荟萃分析(PROSPERO 注册 CRD42019085360),以评估 GTP 对短期和长期儿童和父母结果的影响。通过对一组数据库的系统搜索,确定了 737 篇研究论文,并选择了 11 项试验。评估了研究内和研究间的偏倚风险。干预后立即发现 GTP 对儿童行为问题、功能失调的育儿行为、育儿胜任感、心理适应、父母压力水平、冲突和关系质量有显著的积极影响。干预 6 个月后,仅发现儿童行为问题有积极影响。数据表明,GTP 可能是一种有效的 EBPI,可带来积极的家庭结果。发现存在大量偏倚风险,这突出了提高研究质量的重要性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3c1a/8872306/7132bf6b8fde/ijerph-19-02113-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3c1a/8872306/c92a95a029cb/ijerph-19-02113-g0A1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3c1a/8872306/1254f973db00/ijerph-19-02113-g0A2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3c1a/8872306/d932a1cb67fc/ijerph-19-02113-g0A3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3c1a/8872306/1367216e5418/ijerph-19-02113-g0A4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3c1a/8872306/393abe0b640c/ijerph-19-02113-g0A5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3c1a/8872306/31d3975f4f6d/ijerph-19-02113-g0A6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3c1a/8872306/23628d100f8d/ijerph-19-02113-g0A7.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3c1a/8872306/6ee6288049a7/ijerph-19-02113-g0A8.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3c1a/8872306/2ad025f79b59/ijerph-19-02113-g0A9.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3c1a/8872306/7e8b042a4586/ijerph-19-02113-g0A10.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3c1a/8872306/b05ab3a915a6/ijerph-19-02113-g0A11.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3c1a/8872306/fe391516c075/ijerph-19-02113-g0A12.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3c1a/8872306/990d48475bb7/ijerph-19-02113-g0A13.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3c1a/8872306/421b04a15853/ijerph-19-02113-g0A14.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3c1a/8872306/7132bf6b8fde/ijerph-19-02113-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3c1a/8872306/c92a95a029cb/ijerph-19-02113-g0A1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3c1a/8872306/1254f973db00/ijerph-19-02113-g0A2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3c1a/8872306/d932a1cb67fc/ijerph-19-02113-g0A3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3c1a/8872306/1367216e5418/ijerph-19-02113-g0A4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3c1a/8872306/393abe0b640c/ijerph-19-02113-g0A5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3c1a/8872306/31d3975f4f6d/ijerph-19-02113-g0A6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3c1a/8872306/23628d100f8d/ijerph-19-02113-g0A7.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3c1a/8872306/6ee6288049a7/ijerph-19-02113-g0A8.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3c1a/8872306/2ad025f79b59/ijerph-19-02113-g0A9.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3c1a/8872306/7e8b042a4586/ijerph-19-02113-g0A10.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3c1a/8872306/b05ab3a915a6/ijerph-19-02113-g0A11.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3c1a/8872306/fe391516c075/ijerph-19-02113-g0A12.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3c1a/8872306/990d48475bb7/ijerph-19-02113-g0A13.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3c1a/8872306/421b04a15853/ijerph-19-02113-g0A14.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3c1a/8872306/7132bf6b8fde/ijerph-19-02113-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Group Triple P Intervention Effects on Children and Parents: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.群组 Triple P 干预对儿童和家长的效果:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Feb 13;19(4):2113. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19042113.
2
Parent training interventions for parents with intellectual disability.针对智障父母的家长培训干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Jul 13;7(7):CD007987. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007987.pub3.
3
Family-centred interventions for Indigenous early childhood well-being by primary healthcare services.以初级医疗保健服务为中心的家庭干预措施,促进土著儿童早期的身心健康。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Dec 13;12(12):CD012463. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012463.pub2.
4
Parent-training programmes for improving maternal psychosocial health.改善孕产妇心理社会健康的家长培训项目。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2004(1):CD002020. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002020.pub2.
5
Family and parenting interventions in children and adolescents with conduct disorder and delinquency aged 10-17.针对10至17岁品行障碍和犯罪青少年的家庭及养育干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2001;2001(2):CD003015. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003015.
6
The efficacy of mindful parenting interventions: A systematic review and meta-analysis.正念养育干预的效果:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2021 Sep;121:103996. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2021.103996. Epub 2021 Jun 7.
7
Face-to-face interventions for informing or educating parents about early childhood vaccination.针对向父母宣传或教育幼儿疫苗接种情况的面对面干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 May 8;5(5):CD010038. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010038.pub3.
8
Parent-training programmes for improving maternal psychosocial health.改善孕产妇心理社会健康的家长培训项目。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2001(2):CD002020. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002020.
9
Peer support interventions for parents and carers of children with complex needs.针对有复杂需求的儿童的父母和照顾者的同伴支持干预。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Dec 20;12(12):CD010618. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010618.pub2.
10
A systematic review of speech, language and communication interventions for children with Down syndrome from 0 to 6 years.对0至6岁唐氏综合征儿童言语、语言和沟通干预措施的系统评价。
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2022 Mar;57(2):441-463. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.12699. Epub 2022 Feb 22.

引用本文的文献

1
Universal, selective and indicated parenting interventions to prevent the development of adverse mental health outcomes in youth: a meta-review of systematic reviews.预防青少年不良心理健康结果发展的通用、选择性和针对性养育干预措施:系统评价的元综述
BMJ Ment Health. 2025 Jul 3;28(1):e301613. doi: 10.1136/bmjment-2025-301613.
2
Examining the rollout of the Triple P system parenting program in Manitoba on rates of child maltreatment: Administrative data analyses and document review of policies and programs.考察曼尼托巴省三阶段积极亲子教养系统育儿项目的推行对儿童虐待发生率的影响:行政数据分析以及对政策与项目的文件审查
Can J Public Health. 2025 Mar 19. doi: 10.17269/s41997-025-01005-9.
3

本文引用的文献

1
The CONSORT-SPI 2018 extension: a new guideline for reporting social and psychological intervention trials.《CONSORT-SPI 2018扩展版:社会和心理干预试验报告新指南》
Addiction. 2019 Jan;114(1):4-8. doi: 10.1111/add.14411. Epub 2018 Aug 30.
2
Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Parent Group Interventions for Primary School Children Aged 4-12 Years with Externalizing and/or Internalizing Problems.对4至12岁有外化和/或内化问题的小学生家长群体干预措施的系统评价和荟萃分析
Child Psychiatry Hum Dev. 2018 Apr;49(2):244-267. doi: 10.1007/s10578-017-0745-9.
3
Sustained, fade-out or sleeper effects? A systematic review and meta-analysis of parenting interventions for disruptive child behavior.
Building School-Based Capacity to Support Parenting: Challenges and Lessons Learned.
建立基于学校的育儿支持能力:挑战与经验教训。
School Ment Health. 2023 Sep;15(3):886-899. doi: 10.1007/s12310-023-09593-y. Epub 2023 Jun 25.
4
Virtual Delivery of Parent Coaching Interventions in Early Childhood Mental Health: A Scoping Review.幼儿心理健康中家长指导干预的虚拟交付:一项范围综述
Child Psychiatry Hum Dev. 2025 Jun;56(3):1-37. doi: 10.1007/s10578-023-01597-8. Epub 2023 Sep 23.
5
Interventions for Young Children's Mental Health: A Review of Reviews.干预儿童心理健康:综述研究。
Clin Child Fam Psychol Rev. 2023 Sep;26(3):593-641. doi: 10.1007/s10567-023-00443-6. Epub 2023 Jul 24.
6
Associations between early childhood adversity and behavioral, substance use, and academic outcomes in childhood through adolescence in a U.S. longitudinal cohort.在美国一项纵向队列研究中,儿童期早期逆境与儿童期至青春期行为、物质使用和学业成绩的关系。
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2023 Mar 1;244:109795. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2023.109795. Epub 2023 Feb 3.
持续、消退还是潜伏效应?父母教养干预破坏性行为儿童的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Clin Psychol Rev. 2017 Feb;51:153-163. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2016.11.006. Epub 2016 Nov 14.
4
A randomized controlled trial of a brief versus standard group parenting program for toddler aggression.一项针对幼儿攻击行为的简短与标准团体育儿计划的随机对照试验。
Aggress Behav. 2017 May;43(3):291-303. doi: 10.1002/ab.21689. Epub 2016 Nov 17.
5
Enhancing Father Engagement and Interparental Teamwork in an Evidence-Based Parenting Intervention: A Randomized-Controlled Trial of Outcomes and Processes.在基于证据的育儿干预中提高父亲参与度和父母间的团队合作:一项关于结果与过程的随机对照试验
Behav Ther. 2015 Nov;46(6):749-63. doi: 10.1016/j.beth.2015.05.008. Epub 2015 Jun 11.
6
The Triple P-Positive Parenting Program: a systematic review and meta-analysis of a multi-level system of parenting support.三重 P 正向育儿计划:多层次育儿支持系统的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Clin Psychol Rev. 2014 Jun;34(4):337-57. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2014.04.003. Epub 2014 Apr 26.
7
Cochrane review: behavioural and cognitive-behavioural group-based parenting programmes for early-onset conduct problems in children aged 3 to 12 years (Review).Cochrane系统评价:基于行为和认知行为的小组育儿计划对3至12岁儿童早期品行问题的影响(综述)
Evid Based Child Health. 2013 Mar 7;8(2):318-692. doi: 10.1002/ebch.1905.
8
Stepping Stones Triple P-Positive Parenting Program for children with disability: a systematic review and meta-analysis.针对残疾儿童的踏脚石三重 P 积极育儿计划:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Res Dev Disabil. 2013 May;34(5):1556-71. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2013.01.022. Epub 2013 Mar 6.
9
The effectiveness of a Group Triple P with Chinese parents who have a child with developmental disabilities: a randomized controlled trial.中文家长参与的群组 Triple P 对发育障碍儿童的有效性:一项随机对照试验。
Res Dev Disabil. 2013 Mar;34(3):976-84. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2012.11.023. Epub 2013 Jan 3.
10
How evidence-based is an 'evidence-based parenting program'? A PRISMA systematic review and meta-analysis of Triple P.基于证据的育儿计划有多“基于证据”? Triple P 的 PRISMA 系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMC Med. 2012 Nov 2;10:130. doi: 10.1186/1741-7015-10-130.