Kiyohara Kosuke, Kitamura Yuri, Ayusawa Mamoru, Nitta Masahiko, Iwami Taku, Nakata Ken, Sobue Tomotaka, Kitamura Tetsuhisa
Department of Food Science, Faculty of Home Economics, Otsuma Women's University, 12 Sanbancho Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo 102-8357, Japan.
Division of Environmental Medicine and Population Sciences, Department of Social and Environmental Medicine, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, 2-2 Yamadaoka, Suita 565-0871, Japan.
J Clin Med. 2022 Feb 10;11(4):928. doi: 10.3390/jcm11040928.
We aimed to investigate how the types of bystander-initiated cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) among students have changed recently. We also determined the association between two types of bystander-CPRs (i.e., chest compression-only CPR [CCCPR] and conventional CPR with rescue breathing [CCRB]) and survival after OHCA. From a nationwide registry of pediatric OHCAs occurring in school settings in Japan, the data of 253 non-traumatic OHCA patients (elementary, junior high, and high school/technical college students) receiving bystander-CPR between April 2008 and December 2017 were analyzed. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was conducted to assess the impact of different types of bystander-CPR on 30-day survival with favorable neurological outcomes. The proportion of patients receiving CCCPR increased from 25.0% during 2008-2009 to 55.3% during 2016-2017 ( for trend < 0.001). Overall, 53.2% (50/94) of patients receiving CCCPR and 46.5% (74/159) of those receiving CCRB survived for 30 days with favorable neurological outcomes. Multivariable analysis showed no significant difference in outcomes between the two groups (adjusted odds ratio: 1.23, 95% confidence interval: 0.67-2.28). In this setting, CCCPR is a common type of bystander-CPR for OHCA in students, and the effectiveness of CCCPR and CCRB on survival outcomes seems comparable.
我们旨在调查近期学生对院外心脏骤停(OHCA)实施的旁观者发起的心肺复苏(CPR)类型有何变化。我们还确定了两种旁观者心肺复苏类型(即仅胸外按压心肺复苏[CCCPR]和有通气的传统心肺复苏[CCRB])与院外心脏骤停后存活之间的关联。从日本学校环境中发生的儿科院外心脏骤停的全国登记处,分析了2008年4月至2017年12月期间接受旁观者心肺复苏的253例非创伤性院外心脏骤停患者(小学生、初中生和高中生/技术学院学生)的数据。进行多变量逻辑回归分析,以评估不同类型的旁观者心肺复苏对30天存活且神经功能良好结局的影响。接受仅胸外按压心肺复苏的患者比例从2008 - 2009年的25.0%增至2016 - 2017年的55.3%(趋势P<0.001)。总体而言,接受仅胸外按压心肺复苏的患者中有53.2%(50/94)以及接受有通气的传统心肺复苏的患者中有46.5%(74/159)存活30天且神经功能良好。多变量分析显示两组结局无显著差异(调整优势比:1.23,95%置信区间:0.67 - 2.28)。在此情况下,仅胸外按压心肺复苏是学生院外心脏骤停中常见的旁观者心肺复苏类型,且仅胸外按压心肺复苏和有通气的传统心肺复苏对存活结局的有效性似乎相当。