• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

需要植入人工耳蜗的Vibrant Soundbridge用户出现的进行性感音神经性听力损失

Progressive Sensorineural Hearing Loss in Vibrant Soundbridge Users Requiring Cochlear Implantation.

作者信息

Brkic Faris F, Baumgartner Wolf-Dieter, Riss Dominik, Thurner Thomas, Liu David T, Gstöttner Wolfgang, Vyskocil Erich

机构信息

Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria.

出版信息

J Pers Med. 2022 Jan 31;12(2):191. doi: 10.3390/jpm12020191.

DOI:10.3390/jpm12020191
PMID:35207679
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8878649/
Abstract

Less than 20% of patients with sensorineural hearing loss (HL) provided with the Vibrant Soundbridge (VSB) experience a progressive HL and warrant cochlear implantation (CI). The aim of this study was to identify possible predictors of progressive HL prior to VSB implantation. This retrospective study included all consecutive ears with sensorineural HL provided with the VSB between 1998 and 2016. The patient cohort was divided in a study group comprising patients who underwent CI (CI group) after years of VSB usage and those who did not require VSB replacement during the observational time (control group). Pre- and postoperative pure-tone audiometry thresholds were compared among the two groups. Fifteen out of 81 VSB devices (18.5%) required a CI. The CI group had higher preoperative air-conduction (AC) thresholds than the control group (64.3 ± 8.9 dB vs. 56.3 ± 12.9 dB; = 0.007) at the time of the VSB implantation. On average, the CI group was significantly younger (39.1 ± 12.3 years vs. 52.6 ± 16.2 years; = 0.003). In conclusion, VSB users with higher preoperative AC thresholds and younger age at the time of VSB implantation might be at risk for progressive HL within the upcoming eight years and need a further CI surgery. Preoperative counseling is particularly advisable in this patient group.

摘要

接受振动声桥(VSB)治疗的感音神经性听力损失(HL)患者中,不到20%会出现进行性HL并需要进行人工耳蜗植入(CI)。本研究的目的是确定VSB植入前进行性HL的可能预测因素。这项回顾性研究纳入了1998年至2016年间所有接受VSB治疗的连续性感音神经性HL患者。将患者队列分为一个研究组,该组包括在使用VSB多年后接受CI的患者(CI组)和在观察期内不需要更换VSB的患者(对照组)。比较了两组术前和术后的纯音听力测定阈值。81个VSB装置中有15个(18.5%)需要进行CI。在VSB植入时,CI组的术前气导(AC)阈值高于对照组(64.3±8.9 dB对56.3±12.9 dB;P=0.007)。平均而言,CI组明显更年轻(39.1±12.3岁对52.6±16.2岁;P=0.003)。总之,术前AC阈值较高且VSB植入时年龄较小的VSB使用者在未来八年内可能有进行性HL的风险,需要进一步进行CI手术。对于该患者群体,术前咨询尤为可取。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/af2a/8878649/6beaebf1fbf6/jpm-12-00191-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/af2a/8878649/ba369b3a311b/jpm-12-00191-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/af2a/8878649/e4c23fde031e/jpm-12-00191-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/af2a/8878649/ae64b906fdc2/jpm-12-00191-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/af2a/8878649/88cc02f90b5c/jpm-12-00191-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/af2a/8878649/9386b8729e91/jpm-12-00191-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/af2a/8878649/6beaebf1fbf6/jpm-12-00191-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/af2a/8878649/ba369b3a311b/jpm-12-00191-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/af2a/8878649/e4c23fde031e/jpm-12-00191-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/af2a/8878649/ae64b906fdc2/jpm-12-00191-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/af2a/8878649/88cc02f90b5c/jpm-12-00191-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/af2a/8878649/9386b8729e91/jpm-12-00191-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/af2a/8878649/6beaebf1fbf6/jpm-12-00191-g006.jpg

相似文献

1
Progressive Sensorineural Hearing Loss in Vibrant Soundbridge Users Requiring Cochlear Implantation.需要植入人工耳蜗的Vibrant Soundbridge用户出现的进行性感音神经性听力损失
J Pers Med. 2022 Jan 31;12(2):191. doi: 10.3390/jpm12020191.
2
Our auditory results using the Vibrant Soundbridge on the long process of the incus: 20 years of data.我们使用振动声桥作用于砧骨长突的听觉结果:20年的数据。
Auris Nasus Larynx. 2018 Feb;45(1):66-72. doi: 10.1016/j.anl.2017.02.007. Epub 2017 Mar 9.
3
[Vibrant soundbridge implantation (two cases report)].
Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2011 Jul;46(7):576-9.
4
[The active middle ear implant for the rehabilitation of sensorineural, mixed and conductive hearing losses].用于感音神经性、混合性和传导性听力损失康复的有源中耳植入物
Laryngorhinootologie. 2011 Sep;90(9):560-72. doi: 10.1055/s-0031-1286321. Epub 2011 Sep 12.
5
Comparison of hearing performance in patients with borderline indication for active middle ear or cochlear implants: clinical outcomes to guide preoperative counseling and decision making.对于有主动中耳或人工耳蜗植入边缘指征的患者的听力表现进行比较:指导术前咨询和决策的临床结果。
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2024 Jul;281(7):3569-3575. doi: 10.1007/s00405-024-08491-6. Epub 2024 Feb 7.
6
Clinical Experience of Vibroplasty With Direct Coupling to the Oval Window Without Use of a Coupler.直接耦合卵圆窗的振颤治疗的临床经验,无需使用耦合器。
Laryngoscope. 2020 Dec;130(12):E926-E932. doi: 10.1002/lary.28514. Epub 2020 Jan 24.
7
Vibrant Soundbridge for hearing restoration after chronic ear surgery.用于慢性耳部手术后听力恢复的活力声桥
Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol (Bord). 2009;130(2):83-8.
8
Long-term results of incus vibroplasty in patients with moderate-to-severe sensorineural hearing loss.中重度感音神经性听力损失患者砧骨振动成形术的长期效果
Audiol Neurootol. 2015;20(2):136-146. doi: 10.1159/000368387. Epub 2015 Mar 18.
9
Evaluation of Maximal Speech Intelligibility With Vibrant Soundbridge in Patients With Sensorineural Hearing Loss.感音神经性听力损失患者使用振动声桥的最大言语可懂度评估
Otol Neurotol. 2017 Oct;38(9):1246-1250. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000001537.
10
Audiological application criteria for implantable hearing aid devices: a clinical experience at the Nijmegen ORL clinic.植入式助听器设备的听力学应用标准:奈梅亨耳鼻喉科诊所的临床经验。
Laryngoscope. 2008 Sep;118(9):1645-9. doi: 10.1097/MLG.0b013e31817b013a.

引用本文的文献

1
Is Age a Limiting Factor for Audiological Results in Active Middle Ear Implants?年龄是主动式中耳植入听力结果的限制因素吗?
J Pers Med. 2023 Nov 26;13(12):1650. doi: 10.3390/jpm13121650.

本文引用的文献

1
Overview of cisplatin-induced neurotoxicity and ototoxicity, and the protective agents.顺铂诱导的神经毒性和耳毒性概述及保护剂。
Food Chem Toxicol. 2020 Feb;136:111079. doi: 10.1016/j.fct.2019.111079. Epub 2019 Dec 28.
2
Long-Term Outcome of Hearing Rehabilitation With An Active Middle Ear Implant.有源中耳植入听力康复的长期效果
Laryngoscope. 2019 Feb;129(2):477-481. doi: 10.1002/lary.27513. Epub 2018 Oct 4.
3
Noise-induced hearing loss: a modern epidemic?噪声性听力损失:一种现代流行病?
Br J Hosp Med (Lond). 2017 May 2;78(5):286-290. doi: 10.12968/hmed.2017.78.5.286.
4
Our auditory results using the Vibrant Soundbridge on the long process of the incus: 20 years of data.我们使用振动声桥作用于砧骨长突的听觉结果:20年的数据。
Auris Nasus Larynx. 2018 Feb;45(1):66-72. doi: 10.1016/j.anl.2017.02.007. Epub 2017 Mar 9.
5
Active Middle Ear Implantation: Long-term Medical and Technical Follow-up, Implant Survival, and Complications.有源中耳植入:长期医学和技术随访、植入物存活情况及并发症
Otol Neurotol. 2016 Jun;37(5):513-9. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000001015.
6
Sensorineural Hearing Loss in Cholesteatoma.胆脂瘤型感音神经性听力损失
Otol Neurotol. 2016 Mar;37(3):214-7. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000000952.
7
Standardized Active Middle-Ear Implant Coupling to the Short Incus Process.标准化主动式中耳植入物与砧骨短突的耦合
Otol Neurotol. 2015 Sep;36(8):1390-8. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000000822.
8
Pros and Cons of Round Window Vibroplasty in Open Cavities: Audiological, Surgical, and Quality of Life Outcomes.开放式中耳腔圆窗镫骨足板振动成形术的利弊:听力学、手术及生活质量结果
Otol Neurotol. 2015 Jul;36(6):944-52. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000000763.
9
Long-term results of incus vibroplasty in patients with moderate-to-severe sensorineural hearing loss.中重度感音神经性听力损失患者砧骨振动成形术的长期效果
Audiol Neurootol. 2015;20(2):136-146. doi: 10.1159/000368387. Epub 2015 Mar 18.
10
Vibroplasty in mixed and conductive hearing loss: comparison of different coupling methods.混合性和传导性听力损失的振动成形术:不同耦合方法的比较。
Laryngoscope. 2014 Jun;124(6):1436-43. doi: 10.1002/lary.24474. Epub 2013 Dec 13.