• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经导管主动脉瓣置换术中的脑保护——我们能否不用?一项真实世界的全人群意向性治疗研究——对卒中发生率、住院时间和12个月死亡率的影响

Cerebral Protection in TAVR-Can We Do Without? A Real-World All-Comer Intention-to-Treat Study-Impact on Stroke Rate, Length of Hospital Stay, and Twelve-Month Mortality.

作者信息

Donà Carolina, Koschutnik Matthias, Nitsche Christian, Winter Max-Paul, Seidl Veronika, Siller-Matula Jolanta, Mach Markus, Andreas Martin, Bartko Philipp, Kammerlander Andreas Anselm, Goliasch Georg, Lang Irene, Hengstenberg Christian, Mascherbauer Julia

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine II, Division of Cardiology, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria.

Department of Cardiac Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria.

出版信息

J Pers Med. 2022 Feb 21;12(2):320. doi: 10.3390/jpm12020320.

DOI:10.3390/jpm12020320
PMID:35207808
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8878932/
Abstract

: Stroke associated with transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is a potentially devastating complication. Until recently, the Sentinel™ Cerebral Protection System (CPS; Boston Scientific, Marlborough, MA, USA) has been the only commercially available device for mechanical prevention of TAVR-related stroke. However, its effectiveness is still undetermined. To explore the impact of Sentinel™ on stroke rate, length of hospital stay (LOS), and twelve-month mortality in a single-center, real-world, all-comers TAVR cohort. Between January 2019 and August 2020 consecutive patients were assigned to TAVR with or without Sentinel™ in a 1:1 fashion according to the treating operator. We defined as primary endpoint clinically detectable cerebrovascular events within 72 h after TAVR and as secondary endpoints LOS and 12-month mortality. Logistic and linear regression analyses were used to assess associations of Sentinel™ use with endpoints. Of 411 patients (80 ± 7 y/o, 47.4% female, EuroSCORE II 6.3 ± 5.9%), Sentinel™ was used in 213 (51.8%), with both filters correctly deployed in 189 (46.0%). Twenty (4.9%) cerebrovascular events were recorded, ten (2.4%) of which were disabling strokes. Patients with Sentinel™ suffered 71% less (univariate analysis; OR 0.29, 95%CI 0.11-0.82; = 0.02) and, respectively, 76% less (multivariate analysis; OR 0.24, 95%CI 0.08-0.76; = 0.02) cerebrovascular events compared to patients without Sentinel™. Sentinel™ use was also significantly associated with shorter LOS (Regression coefficient -2.47, 95%CI -4.08, -0.87; < 0.01) and lower 12-month all-cause mortality (OR 0.45; 95%CI 0.22-0.93; = 0.03). In the present prospective all-comers TAVR cohort, patients with Sentinel™ use showed (1) lower rates of cerebrovascular events, (2) shortened LOS, and (3) improved 12-month survival. These data promote the use of a CPS when implanting TAVR valves.

摘要

经导管主动脉瓣置换术(TAVR)相关的中风是一种潜在的毁灭性并发症。直到最近,Sentinel™脑保护系统(CPS;美国马萨诸塞州马尔伯勒市波士顿科学公司)一直是唯一可用于机械预防TAVR相关中风的商用设备。然而,其有效性仍未确定。为了探讨Sentinel™对单中心、真实世界、所有患者的TAVR队列中中风发生率、住院时间(LOS)和12个月死亡率的影响。在2019年1月至2020年8月期间,根据治疗操作人员的安排,连续患者以1:1的方式被分配接受有或没有Sentinel™的TAVR治疗。我们将TAVR后72小时内临床可检测到的脑血管事件定义为主要终点,将LOS和12个月死亡率定义为次要终点。采用逻辑回归和线性回归分析来评估Sentinel™的使用与终点之间的关联。在411例患者(80±7岁,47.4%为女性,欧洲心脏手术风险评估系统II评分为6.3±5.9%)中,213例(51.8%)使用了Sentinel™,其中189例(46.0%)两个滤网均正确植入。记录到20例(4.9%)脑血管事件,其中10例(2.4%)为致残性中风。与未使用Sentinel™的患者相比,使用Sentinel™的患者脑血管事件减少了71%(单因素分析;OR 0.29,95%CI 0.11 - 0.82;P = 0.02),分别减少了76%(多因素分析;OR 0.24,95%CI 0.08 - 0.76;P = 0.02)。使用Sentinel™还与较短的LOS(回归系数 -2.47,95%CI -4.08,-0.87;P < 0.01)和较低的12个月全因死亡率(OR 0.45;95%CI 0.22 - 0.93;P = 0.03)显著相关。在本前瞻性的所有患者TAVR队列中,使用Sentinel™的患者表现出:(1)脑血管事件发生率较低;(2)住院时间缩短;(3)12个月生存率提高。这些数据支持在植入TAVR瓣膜时使用CPS。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f51a/8878932/d6f9990d6db9/jpm-12-00320-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f51a/8878932/834042d6e65c/jpm-12-00320-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f51a/8878932/a4d3f778d08f/jpm-12-00320-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f51a/8878932/dc2639082460/jpm-12-00320-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f51a/8878932/d6f9990d6db9/jpm-12-00320-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f51a/8878932/834042d6e65c/jpm-12-00320-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f51a/8878932/a4d3f778d08f/jpm-12-00320-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f51a/8878932/dc2639082460/jpm-12-00320-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f51a/8878932/d6f9990d6db9/jpm-12-00320-g004.jpg

相似文献

1
Cerebral Protection in TAVR-Can We Do Without? A Real-World All-Comer Intention-to-Treat Study-Impact on Stroke Rate, Length of Hospital Stay, and Twelve-Month Mortality.经导管主动脉瓣置换术中的脑保护——我们能否不用?一项真实世界的全人群意向性治疗研究——对卒中发生率、住院时间和12个月死亡率的影响
J Pers Med. 2022 Feb 21;12(2):320. doi: 10.3390/jpm12020320.
2
Patient Characteristics and Outcomes Associated with Sentinel Protection Device Use in Patients with Aortic Valve Disease Undergoing TAVR in a "Real-World" Setting.在“真实世界”环境中接受经导管主动脉瓣置换术(TAVR)的主动脉瓣疾病患者中,与使用哨兵保护装置相关的患者特征和结局
Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2024 Jan 4;25(1):3. doi: 10.31083/j.rcm2501003. eCollection 2024 Jan.
3
Cerebral Embolic Protection in Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation Using the Sentinel Cerebral Protection System: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.使用Sentinel脑保护系统在经导管主动脉瓣植入术中进行脑栓塞保护:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Cardiol Ther. 2024 Jun;13(2):299-314. doi: 10.1007/s40119-024-00359-4. Epub 2024 Feb 10.
4
Exploring the Difference in Post-procedural Stroke Rates Between Patients with Aortic Stenosis Who Undergo Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Versus Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement.探索接受经导管主动脉瓣置换术与外科主动脉瓣置换术的主动脉瓣狭窄患者术后中风发生率的差异。
Cureus. 2018 Apr 17;10(4):e2494. doi: 10.7759/cureus.2494.
5
Acute and 30-Day Outcomes in Women After TAVR: Results From the WIN-TAVI (Women's INternational Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation) Real-World Registry.经导管主动脉瓣置换术(TAVR)后女性的急性和 30 天结局:来自 WIN-TAVI(女性国际经导管主动脉瓣植入)真实世界注册研究的结果。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2016 Aug 8;9(15):1589-600. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2016.05.015.
6
Cerebral Embolic Protection During Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Significantly Reduces Death and Stroke Compared With Unprotected Procedures.经导管主动脉瓣置换术中脑保护显著降低死亡率和卒率,优于无保护手术。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2017 Nov 27;10(22):2297-2303. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2017.06.037. Epub 2017 Sep 13.
7
Transfemoral TAVR in Nonagenarians: From the CENTER Collaboration.经股动脉入路主动脉瓣置换术在 90 岁以上高龄患者中的应用:来自 CENTER 协作组的研究
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2019 May 27;12(10):911-920. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2019.02.031.
8
TriGuard HDH embolic deflection device for cerebral protection during transcatheter aortic valve replacement.用于经导管主动脉瓣置换术中脑保护的TriGuard HDH栓子偏转装置。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2017 Feb 15;89(3):470-477. doi: 10.1002/ccd.26566. Epub 2016 Apr 28.
9
1-Year Clinical Outcomes in Women After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: Results From the First WIN-TAVI Registry.经导管主动脉瓣置换术后女性 1 年的临床结局:来自首个 WIN-TAVI 注册研究的结果。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 Jan 8;11(1):1-12. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2017.09.034.
10
Length of Stay and Discharge Disposition After Transcatheter Versus Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement in the United States.美国经导管主动脉瓣置换术与外科主动脉瓣置换术后的住院时间和出院去向。
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 Sep;11(9):e006929. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.118.006929.

引用本文的文献

1
Neuroprotection Devices in Cardiac Catheterization Laboratories: Does It Sufficiently Protect Our Patients?心脏导管实验室中的神经保护装置:它是否能充分保护我们的患者?
Medicina (Kaunas). 2025 Feb 10;61(2):305. doi: 10.3390/medicina61020305.
2
Redo-TAVR for bioprosthetic valve degeneration with obvious neoplasm in a left cerebral infarction patient.左脑梗死患者生物瓣膜退变伴明显赘生物的再次经导管主动脉瓣置换术
Clin Case Rep. 2024 Aug 7;12(8):e9315. doi: 10.1002/ccr3.9315. eCollection 2024 Aug.
3
Safety and efficacy of cerebral embolic protection in transcatheter aortic valve implantation: an updated meta-analysis.

本文引用的文献

1
Prehospital Evaluation of the FAST-ED as a Secondary Stroke Screen to Identify Large Vessel Occlusion Strokes.院前评估 FAST-ED 作为一种二级卒中筛查方法,以识别大血管闭塞性卒中。
Prehosp Emerg Care. 2022 May-Jun;26(3):333-338. doi: 10.1080/10903127.2021.1979701. Epub 2021 Oct 20.
2
Comparing Trajectory of Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement in the Early vs. Late Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Era.比较早期与晚期经导管主动脉瓣置换时代外科主动脉瓣置换的轨迹。
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2021 Jun 22;8:680123. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2021.680123. eCollection 2021.
3
Randomized Evaluation of TriGuard 3 Cerebral Embolic Protection After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: REFLECT II.
经导管主动脉瓣植入术中脑栓塞保护的安全性和有效性:一项更新的荟萃分析。
AsiaIntervention. 2024 Feb 29;10(1):51-59. doi: 10.4244/AIJ-D-23-00022. eCollection 2024 Feb.
4
Cerebral embolic protection during transcatheter heart interventions.经导管心脏介入术中的脑栓塞保护。
EuroIntervention. 2023 Sep 18;19(7):549-570. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-23-00166.
5
Safety and efficacy of cerebral embolic protection devices for patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement: An updated meta-analysis.经导管主动脉瓣置换术患者使用脑栓塞保护装置的安全性和有效性:一项更新的荟萃分析。
Health Sci Rep. 2023 Jul 1;6(7):e1391. doi: 10.1002/hsr2.1391. eCollection 2023 Jul.
经导管主动脉瓣置换术后使用 TriGuard 3 脑保护装置的随机评估:REFLECT II 研究。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2021 Mar 8;14(5):515-527. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2020.11.011. Epub 2021 Mar 1.
4
The Use and Outcomes of Cerebral Protection Devices for Patients Undergoing Transfemoral Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in Clinical Practice.临床实践中经股动脉经导管主动脉瓣置换术患者脑保护装置的使用及结果
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2021 Jan 25;14(2):161-168. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2020.09.047.
5
2020 ACC/AHA Guideline for the Management of Patients With Valvular Heart Disease: Executive Summary: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines.2020 ACC/AHA 瓣膜性心脏病患者管理指南:执行摘要:美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会临床实践指南联合委员会的报告。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2021 Feb 2;77(4):450-500. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2020.11.035. Epub 2020 Dec 17.
6
STS-ACC TVT Registry of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.经导管主动脉瓣置换术的STS-ACC TVT注册研究
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2020 Nov 24;76(21):2492-2516. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2020.09.595.
7
Ischemic Stroke With Cerebral Protection System During Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.经导管主动脉瓣置换术中采用脑保护系统的缺血性卒中
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2020 Sep 28;13(18):2149-2155. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2020.05.039.
8
Predictors of Cumulative Health Care Costs Associated With Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in Severe Aortic Stenosis.严重主动脉瓣狭窄经导管主动脉瓣置换术后累积医疗费用的预测因素。
Can J Cardiol. 2020 Aug;36(8):1244-1251. doi: 10.1016/j.cjca.2019.12.011. Epub 2019 Dec 16.
9
Insights on Embolic Protection, Repositioning, and Stroke: A Subanalysis of the RESPOND Study.栓塞保护、重新定位和卒中的见解:RESPOND 研究的亚分析。
J Interv Cardiol. 2020 May 17;2020:3070427. doi: 10.1155/2020/3070427. eCollection 2020.
10
Evolution, Predictors, and Neurocognitive Effects of Silent Cerebral Embolism During Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.经导管主动脉瓣置换术中静默性脑栓塞的演变、预测因子和神经认知影响。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2020 Jun 8;13(11):1291-1300. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2020.03.004. Epub 2020 May 13.