Suppr超能文献

从进度曲线中删除时间-浓度数据点可改善:对 paraoxonase 1 的研究示例。

The Removal of Time-Concentration Data Points from Progress Curves Improves the Determination of : The Example of Paraoxonase 1.

机构信息

Institute of Biochemistry and Molecular Genetics, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ljubljana, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia.

出版信息

Molecules. 2022 Feb 15;27(4):1306. doi: 10.3390/molecules27041306.

Abstract

Several approaches for determining an enzyme's kinetic parameter (Michaelis constant) from progress curves have been developed in recent decades. In the present article, we compare different approaches on a set of experimental measurements of lactonase activity of paraoxonase 1 (PON1): (1) a differential-equation-based Michaelis-Menten (MM) reaction model in the program Dynafit; (2) an integrated MM rate equation, based on an approximation of the Lambert W function, in the program GraphPad Prism; (3) various techniques based on initial rates; and (4) the novel program "iFIT", based on a method that removes data points outside the area of maximum curvature from the progress curve, before analysis with the integrated MM rate equation. We concluded that the integrated MM rate equation alone does not determine kinetic parameters precisely enough; however, when coupled with a method that removes data points (e.g., iFIT), it is highly precise. The results of iFIT are comparable to the results of Dynafit and outperform those of the approach with initial rates or with fitting the entire progress curve in GraphPad Prism; however, iFIT is simpler to use and does not require inputting a reaction mechanism. Removing unnecessary points from progress curves and focusing on the area around the maximum curvature is highly advised for all researchers determining values from progress curves.

摘要

近几十年来,已经开发出了几种从进展曲线确定酶的动力学参数(米氏常数)的方法。在本文中,我们将在一组对 paraoxonase 1(PON1)的内酯酶活性的实验测量结果上比较不同的方法:(1)Dynafit 程序中的基于微分方程的米氏-门坦(MM)反应模型;(2)GraphPad Prism 中基于 Lambert W 函数近似的积分 MM 速率方程;(3)基于初始速率的各种技术;以及(4)基于一种方法的新程序“iFIT”,该方法在使用积分 MM 速率方程进行分析之前,从进展曲线中删除超出最大曲率区域的数据点。我们得出结论,单独的积分 MM 速率方程不能足够精确地确定动力学参数;但是,当与删除数据点的方法(例如 iFIT)结合使用时,它具有高度的精确性。iFIT 的结果与 Dynafit 的结果相当,并且优于初始速率方法或在 GraphPad Prism 中拟合整个进展曲线的方法;但是,iFIT 更简单易用,并且不需要输入反应机制。对于所有从进展曲线确定 值的研究人员,强烈建议从进展曲线中删除不必要的点,并专注于最大曲率周围的区域。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/162d/8874660/4b153a3b154b/molecules-27-01306-g0A1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验