Laboratory of Nanobiotechnology, Institute of Biomedical Chemistry, Pogodinskaya St. 10/8, 119121 Moscow, Russia.
Laboratory of Shock Wave Impacts, Joint Institute for High Temperatures of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Izhorskaya St. 13 Bd.2, 125412 Moscow, Russia.
Molecules. 2022 Feb 18;27(4):1386. doi: 10.3390/molecules27041386.
The three-dimensional structure of monomers and homodimers of CYP102A1/WT (wild-type) proteins and their A83F and A83I mutant forms was predicted using the AlphaFold2 (AF2) and AlphaFold Multimer (AFMultimer) programs, which were compared with the rate constants of hydroxylation reactions of these enzyme forms to determine the efficiency of intra- and interprotein electron transport in the CYP102A1 hydroxylase system. The electron transfer rate constants (), which determine the rate of indole hydroxylation by the CYP102A1 system, were calculated based on the distances (R) between donor-acceptor prosthetic groups (PG) FAD→FMN→HEME of these proteins using factor β, which describes an exponential decay from R the speed of electron transport (ET) according to the tunnelling mechanism. It was shown that the structure of monomers in the homodimer, calculated using the AlpfaFold Multimer program, is in good agreement with the experimental structures of globular domains (HEME-, FMN-, and FAD-domains) in CYP102A1/WT obtained by X-ray structural analysis, and the structure of isolated monomers predicted in AF2 does not coincide with the structure of monomers in the homodimer, although a high level of similarity in individual domains remains. The structures of monomers and homodimers of A83F and A83I mutants were also calculated, and their structures were compared with the wild-type protein. Significant differences in the structure of all isolated monomers with respect to the structures of monomers in homodimers were also found for them, and at the same time, insignificant differences were revealed for all homodimers. Comparative analysis for CYP102A1/WT between the calculated intra- and interprotein distances FAD→FMN→HEME and the rate constants of hydroxylation in these proteins showed that the distance between prosthetic groups both in the monomer and in the dimer allows the implementation of electron transfer between PGs, which is consistent with experimental literature data about . For the mutant form of monomer A83I, an increase in the distance between PGs was obtained, which can restrict electron transportation compared to WT; however, for the dimer of this protein, a decrease in the distance between PGs was observed compared to the WT form, which can lead to an increase in the electron transfer rate constant and, accordingly, . For the monomer and homodimer of the A83F mutant, the calculations showed an increase in the distance between the PGs compared to the WT form, which should have led to a decrease in the electron transfer rate, but at the same time, for the homodimer, the approach of the aromatic group F262 with heme can speed up transportation for this form and, accordingly, the rate of hydroxylation.
使用 AlphaFold2 (AF2) 和 AlphaFold Multimer (AFMultimer) 程序预测了 CYP102A1/WT(野生型)蛋白单体和同源二聚体及其 A83F 和 A83I 突变形式的三维结构,并将其与这些酶形式的羟化反应速率常数进行比较,以确定 CYP102A1 羟化酶系统中蛋白质内和蛋白质间电子传递的效率。电子转移速率常数(),决定了 CYP102A1 系统吲哚羟化的速度,是根据这些蛋白质中供体-受体辅基(PG)FAD→FMN→HEME 之间的距离(R),使用因子β计算的β描述了根据隧道机制从 R 到电子传输(ET)速度的指数衰减。结果表明,使用 AlphaFold Multimer 程序计算的同源二聚体中的单体结构与通过 X 射线结构分析获得的 CYP102A1/WT 的球状结构域(HEME-、FMN-和 FAD-结构域)的实验结构吻合较好,而在 AF2 中预测的单体的结构与二聚体中的单体的结构并不吻合,尽管单体的各个结构域之间仍然存在高度的相似性。还计算了 A83F 和 A83I 突变体的单体和同源二聚体的结构,并将其与野生型蛋白进行了比较。还发现,对于它们,单体的所有孤立单体的结构与同源二聚体中的单体的结构也存在显著差异,同时,所有同源二聚体的结构也存在显著差异。对 CYP102A1/WT 进行的比较分析表明,计算得出的蛋白质内和蛋白质间 FAD→FMN→HEME 辅基距离与这些蛋白质的羟化速率常数之间存在显著差异。单体和二聚体中 PG 之间的距离允许 PG 之间的电子转移,这与关于的实验文献数据一致。对于单体 A83I 的突变体,获得了 PG 之间距离的增加,这与 WT 相比可能限制电子传输;然而,对于这种蛋白质的二聚体,与 WT 形式相比,PG 之间的距离观察到减小,这可能导致电子转移速率常数增加,从而导致增加。对于 A83F 突变体的单体和同源二聚体,计算表明与 WT 形式相比,PG 之间的距离增加,这应该导致电子转移速率降低,但同时,对于同源二聚体,芳香族基团 F262 与血红素的接近可以加速这种形式的运输,从而加快羟化速率。