Suppr超能文献

腹腔镜手术与开腹手术:子宫内膜癌的分期手术——马来西亚的早期经验

Laparoscopic versus Laparotomy: Staging Surgery for Endometrial Cancer - Malaysia's Early Experience.

作者信息

Ghazali Wan Ahmad Hazim Wan, Jamil Siti Amira, Sharin Ili Abdullah

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Putrajaya Hospital, Putrajaya, Malaysia.

出版信息

Gynecol Minim Invasive Ther. 2019 Jan-Mar;8(1):25-29. doi: 10.4103/GMIT.GMIT_25_18. Epub 2019 Jan 23.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The objective of the study is to assess the efficacy of laparoscopy compared with laparotomy in extrafascial hysterectomy and lymphadenectomy for endometrial cancer.

DESIGN

This was a retrospective study of small cases over a 5-year period.

SETTING

This study was conducted in Putrajaya Hospital, a district hospital with consultant care level in obstetrics and gynecology.

SAMPLE

Forty women presented with confirmed cases of endometrial cancer based on histopathology result and underwent extrafascial hysterectomy with or without lymphadenectomy between January 2010 and December 2014.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patient outcomes were compared between 26 women who underwent laparoscopic total hysterectomy with or without lymphadenectomy and 14 women who underwent open laparotomy extrafascial hysterectomy with or without lymphadenectomy. Data were collected using electronic medical records.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Postoperative outcomes, operative time, total intraoperative blood loss, number of lymph nodes harvested, and total days of postoperative stay were obtained.

RESULTS

There was a significant reduction in operative blood loss in the laparoscopic group with mean 262.50 ± 47.87 and laparotomy group with mean 381.82 ± 138.33, 95% confidence interval, < 0.05. Postoperative hospital stay was also significantly reduced in the laparoscopic group, where the mean postoperative stay in laparoscopic group was 2.5 ± 2.0 days and laparotomy 5.0 ± 3.6 days. There was no significant difference in mean operative time (the mean operative time: 256 ± 76.40 for laparotomy and 288.75 ± 43.66 for the laparoscopic approach). More number of lymph nodes were harvested laparoscopically (29.75 ± 16.59) than laparotomy (23.0 ± 12.62); however, this was not significant.

CONCLUSIONS

Laparoscopic surgery had significant lesser blood loss and it is comparable to laparotomy in the surgical management of endometrial cancer. Experienced surgeon will be able to perform hysterectomy and lymphadenectomy as equally good to laparotomy with adequate tumor excision and complete staging.

摘要

目的

本研究的目的是评估腹腔镜手术与开腹手术在子宫内膜癌筋膜外子宫切除术及淋巴结清扫术中的疗效。

设计

这是一项对5年内少量病例的回顾性研究。

背景

本研究在布城医院进行,这是一家具有妇产科顾问护理水平的区级医院。

样本

40名经组织病理学结果确诊为子宫内膜癌的女性,于2010年1月至2014年12月期间接受了筋膜外子宫切除术,部分患者同时进行了或未进行淋巴结清扫术。

材料与方法

比较26例行腹腔镜全子宫切除术(部分患者同时进行或未进行淋巴结清扫术)的女性与14例行开腹筋膜外子宫切除术(部分患者同时进行或未进行淋巴结清扫术)的女性的患者结局。数据通过电子病历收集。

主要观察指标

获取术后结局、手术时间、术中总失血量、切除淋巴结数量及术后住院总天数。

结果

腹腔镜组术中平均失血量为262.50±47.87,开腹组为381.82±138.33,95%置信区间,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。腹腔镜组术后住院时间也显著缩短,腹腔镜组术后平均住院时间为2.5±2.0天,开腹组为5.0±3.6天。平均手术时间无显著差异(开腹组平均手术时间为256±76.40,腹腔镜组为288.75±43.66)。腹腔镜手术切除的淋巴结数量(29.75±16.59)多于开腹手术(23.0±12.62);然而,差异无统计学意义。

结论

在子宫内膜癌的手术治疗中,腹腔镜手术的失血量明显较少,且与开腹手术效果相当。经验丰富的外科医生能够在充分切除肿瘤和完成分期的情况下,将子宫切除术和淋巴结清扫术做得与开腹手术同样出色。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

2
Comparison of laparoscopy and laparotomy for endometrial cancer.腹腔镜与开腹手术治疗子宫内膜癌的比较。
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2012 Mar;116(3):185-91. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2011.10.022. Epub 2011 Dec 23.
9
Endometrial cancer.子宫内膜癌
Lancet. 2005;366(9484):491-505. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)67063-8.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验