Xie Hailun, Ruan Guotian, Zhang Qi, Ge Yizhong, Song Mengmeng, Zhang Xi, Liu Xiaoyue, Lin Shiqi, Zhang Xiaowei, Li Xiangrui, Zhang Kangping, Yang Ming, Tang Meng, Cong Minghua, Shi Hanping
Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery/Department of Clinical Nutrition, Beijing Shijitan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100038, People's Republic of China.
Beijing International Science and Technology Cooperation Base for Cancer Metabolism and Nutrition, Beijing, 100038, People's Republic of China.
J Inflamm Res. 2022 Feb 15;15:1005-1015. doi: 10.2147/JIR.S352250. eCollection 2022.
The nutritional risk index (NRI) and handgrip strength (HGS) are useful indicators of nutritional and physical status, respectively, both of them can predict the prognosis of many cancers; however, the predictive accuracy of a single indicator is unsatisfactory. Whether the combination of NRI and HGS could enhance the stratification of the prognosis of patients with cancer cachexia.
The study population was randomly divided into training and validation cohorts. We combined NRI and HGS and constructed the NRI-HGS score. Restricted cubic splines were used to assess the associations between NRI, HGS, and all-cause mortality. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to calculate the survival probability of the patients. The Cox proportional hazards risk model was used to analyze survival and prognostic factors.
Low NRI and low HGS were independent predictors of poor prognosis in patients with cancer cachexia. The NRI-HGS score showed a better prognostic stratification than either NRI or HGS. The co-occurrence of low NRI and low HGS was associated with an approximately 1.8-fold increased risk of mortality. The NRI-HGS score could effectively distinguish patients with a poor prognosis at different pathological stages. Furthermore, we constructed a novel prognostic nomogram based on NRI and HGS. The concordance index and calibration plot confirmed that the nomogram had good prognostic accuracy. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of the nomogram reached >0.8, which was much higher than that of the traditional tumor-node-metastasis staging system. The nomogram provided better prognostic stratification for patients with cancer cachexia.
Low NRI and low HGS are independent prognostic indicators in cancer cachexia. The combination of NRI and HGS improve prognostic stratification for patients with cancer cachexia. Our study suggests combining nutritional and physical status in future cachexia research.
营养风险指数(NRI)和握力(HGS)分别是营养状况和身体状况的有用指标,二者均可预测多种癌症的预后;然而,单一指标的预测准确性并不理想。NRI与HGS的联合能否增强癌症恶病质患者预后的分层。
将研究人群随机分为训练队列和验证队列。我们将NRI与HGS相结合,构建了NRI-HGS评分。采用限制性立方样条评估NRI、HGS与全因死亡率之间的关联。采用Kaplan-Meier法计算患者的生存概率。采用Cox比例风险模型分析生存及预后因素。
低NRI和低HGS是癌症恶病质患者预后不良的独立预测因素。NRI-HGS评分显示出比NRI或HGS更好的预后分层。低NRI与低HGS同时出现与死亡风险增加约1.8倍相关。NRI-HGS评分可有效区分不同病理阶段预后不良的患者。此外,我们基于NRI和HGS构建了一种新型预后列线图。一致性指数和校准图证实该列线图具有良好的预后准确性。列线图的受试者工作特征曲线下面积>0.8,远高于传统的肿瘤-淋巴结-转移分期系统。该列线图为癌症恶病质患者提供了更好的预后分层。
低NRI和低HGS是癌症恶病质的独立预后指标。NRI与HGS的联合改善了癌症恶病质患者的预后分层。我们的研究建议在未来的恶病质研究中结合营养状况和身体状况。