Suppr超能文献

改良老年营养风险指数与握力对癌症患者生存的影响:一项多中心队列研究

Association of Modified Geriatric Nutrition Risk Index and Handgrip Strength With Survival in Cancer: A Multi-Centre Cohort Study.

作者信息

Xie Hailun, Ruan Guotian, Zhang Heyang, Zhang Qi, Ge Yizhong, Song Mengmeng, Zhang Xi, Lin Shiqi, Liu Xiaoyue, Liu Yuying, Zhang Xiaowei, Li Xiangrui, Zhang Kangping, Yang Ming, Tang Meng, Li Zengning, Shi Hanping

机构信息

Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Beijing Shijitan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.

Department of Clinical Nutrition, Beijing Shijitan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.

出版信息

Front Nutr. 2022 Apr 1;9:850138. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2022.850138. eCollection 2022.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to explore the value of combining the modified geriatric nutrition risk index (mGNRI) and handgrip strength (HGS) in the prognosis assessment of cancer.

METHODS

This multicenter, prospective cohort study, enrolled 5,607 cancer patients from 27 medical centers across 17 provinces in China between June 2012 and December 2019. The primary outcome was overall survival. Secondary outcomes included the Karnofsky Performance Scale (KPS) score, Patient-Generated Subjective Global Assessment (PG-SGA) score, cachexia, and admission 90-day outcome. A composite prognostic score (mGNRI-HGS score) was developed based on the mGNRI and HGS. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to draw the survival curve, and log-rank analysis was used to estimate the survival rate. The Cox proportional hazards model was used to investigate the associations of the mGNRI, HGS or mGNRI-HGS score with risk of mortality among the cancer patients, adjusted for potential confounders.

RESULTS

A low mGNRI (HR = 0.99, 95%CI = 0.98-0.99, < 0.001) and low HGS (HR = 0.99, 95%CI = 0.98-0.99, = 0.001) were associated with an increased risk of mortality. A severe mGNRI-HGS score was independently associated with reduced survival. Compared with patients with normal scores, the risk of mortality among the patients with moderate and severe mGNRI-HGS scores was 28.8 and 13.3% higher, respectively. Even within the same pathological stage, it presented significant gradient prognostic stratification. Additionally, a low mGNRI-HGS score was also independently associated with a higher risk of low KPS ( < 0.001), high PGSGA ( < 0.001), cachexia ( < 0.001), and adverse admission 90-day outcome ( < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The mGNRI and HGS may be useful predictors of long-term prognosis in cancer patients. The combination of the two methods provides effective prognostic stratification for cancer patients and could predict physical frailty, malnutrition, and cachexia.

摘要

背景

本研究旨在探讨改良老年营养风险指数(mGNRI)与握力(HGS)相结合在癌症预后评估中的价值。

方法

本多中心前瞻性队列研究于2012年6月至2019年12月期间,纳入了来自中国17个省份27个医疗中心的5607例癌症患者。主要结局为总生存期。次要结局包括卡氏功能状态量表(KPS)评分、患者主观整体评定法(PG-SGA)评分、恶病质及入院90天结局。基于mGNRI和HGS制定了一个综合预后评分(mGNRI-HGS评分)。采用Kaplan-Meier法绘制生存曲线,并使用对数秩检验分析估计生存率。采用Cox比例风险模型,在对潜在混杂因素进行校正后,研究mGNRI、HGS或mGNRI-HGS评分与癌症患者死亡风险之间的关联。

结果

低mGNRI(HR = 0.99,95%CI = 0.98 - 0.99,P < 0.001)和低HGS(HR = 0.99,95%CI = 0.98 - 0.99,P = 0.001)与死亡风险增加相关。严重的mGNRI-HGS评分与生存期缩短独立相关。与评分正常的患者相比,中度和重度mGNRI-HGS评分患者的死亡风险分别高28.8%和13.3%。即使在相同的病理分期内,也呈现出显著的梯度预后分层。此外,低mGNRI-HGS评分还与低KPS(P < 0.001)、高PGSGA(P < 0.001)、恶病质(P < 0.001)及不良入院90天结局(P < 0.001)的高风险独立相关。

结论

mGNRI和HGS可能是癌症患者长期预后的有用预测指标。这两种方法的结合为癌症患者提供了有效的预后分层,并可预测身体虚弱、营养不良和恶病质。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/606c/9012584/ef93b0011d8d/fnut-09-850138-g0002.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验