• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

急性心肌梗死患者1型心肾综合征的危险因素及结局变量

Risk Factors and Outcome Variables of Cardiorenal Syndrome Type 1 in Acute Myocardial Infarction Patients.

作者信息

She Chang-Shou, Deng Yue-Lin, Huang Guo-Qing, Cheng Chao, Zhang Fang-Jie

机构信息

Department of Emergency Medicine, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, People's Republic of China.

Department of Clinical Laboratory, Lixian People's Hospital, Changde, Hunan, People's Republic of China.

出版信息

Int J Gen Med. 2022 Feb 15;15:1565-1573. doi: 10.2147/IJGM.S350361. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.2147/IJGM.S350361
PMID:35210828
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8857974/
Abstract

PURPOSE

This study's goal was to explore risk factors affecting short-term prognosis of cardiorenal syndrome type 1 (CRS1) in acute myocardial infarction (AMI) patients.

METHODS

In this retrospective analysis of CRS1 in AMI patients hospitalized from January 2011 to December 2014, the patients were classified into deceased or survivor groups. Clinical data, including demographics, laboratory results, and 28-day outcomes, were collected.

RESULTS

The incidence rate of CRS1 in AMI patients was 15.2% (274 in 1801). Ultimately, 88 patients were enrolled and 25 (28.4%) were classified into the deceased group, while 63 were classified into the survivor group. There were statistically significant differences between the groups for hypertension, mechanical ventilation, KIDGO stage, NT-proBNP, Hb, ALB, PCI, decreased LVEF, 7th-day SCr value, and the highest SCr value recorded within 7 days (all < 0.05). Multivariate logistic regression showed that the following factors were significantly related to whether a patient died: requiring mechanical ventilation, increased NT-proBNP levels and 7th-day SCr values, and decreased LVEFs. The APACHE II, SOFA, and SASP II scores on the 7th day were significantly higher in the deceased group (all < 0.05). The accuracy of APACHE II, SOFA, and SASP II scores on the 7th day for predicting death were 84.1%, 78.4% and 79.5%, respectively. The AUC of 7th-day APACHE II, SOFA, and SASP II scores was 0.844, 0.803, and 0.827, respectively, with no statistically significant differences between the three scores ( > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

The mortality rate of CRS1 in AMI patients was 28.4% (25 in 88) within 28 days. Mechanical ventilation, increased NT-proBNP levels, the 7th-day SCr value, and decreased LVEF were related to death in AMI patients with CRS1. APACHE II, SOFA, and SAPS II scores on the 7th day were satisfactorily accurate in predicting death within 28 days.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在探讨影响急性心肌梗死(AMI)患者1型心肾综合征(CRS1)短期预后的危险因素。

方法

对2011年1月至2014年12月住院的AMI患者中的CRS1进行回顾性分析,将患者分为死亡组和存活组。收集临床资料,包括人口统计学、实验室检查结果及28天预后情况。

结果

AMI患者中CRS1的发生率为15.2%(1801例中有274例)。最终纳入88例患者,其中25例(28.4%)被归入死亡组,63例被归入存活组。两组在高血压、机械通气、KIDGO分期、NT-proBNP、血红蛋白、白蛋白、PCI、左心室射血分数降低、第7天血清肌酐值以及7天内记录的最高血清肌酐值方面存在统计学显著差异(均P<0.05)。多因素logistic回归显示,以下因素与患者是否死亡显著相关:需要机械通气、NT-proBNP水平升高、第7天血清肌酐值升高以及左心室射血分数降低。死亡组第7天的急性生理与慢性健康状况评分系统II(APACHE II)、序贯器官衰竭评估(SOFA)和简化急性生理学评分II(SAPS II)评分均显著更高(均P<0.05)。第7天APACHE II、SOFA和SAPS II评分预测死亡的准确率分别为84.1%、78.4%和79.5%。第7天APACHE II、SOFA和SAPS II评分的曲线下面积(AUC)分别为0.844、0.803和0.827,三者之间无统计学显著差异(P>0.05)。

结论

AMI患者中CRS1在28天内的死亡率为28.4%(88例中有25例)。机械通气、NT-proBNP水平升高、第7天血清肌酐值以及左心室射血分数降低与CRS1的AMI患者死亡相关。第7天的APACHE II、SOFA和SAPS II评分在预测28天内死亡方面具有令人满意的准确性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b6f5/8857974/df539e343fbc/IJGM-15-1565-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b6f5/8857974/df539e343fbc/IJGM-15-1565-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b6f5/8857974/df539e343fbc/IJGM-15-1565-g0001.jpg

相似文献

1
Risk Factors and Outcome Variables of Cardiorenal Syndrome Type 1 in Acute Myocardial Infarction Patients.急性心肌梗死患者1型心肾综合征的危险因素及结局变量
Int J Gen Med. 2022 Feb 15;15:1565-1573. doi: 10.2147/IJGM.S350361. eCollection 2022.
2
[Establishment and validation of a new predictive equation with multiple risk factors for the development of cardiorenal syndrome type 1 in patients with acute myocardial infarction].[急性心肌梗死患者发生1型心肾综合征多危险因素新预测方程的建立与验证]
Zhonghua Xin Xue Guan Bing Za Zhi. 2021 Aug 24;49(8):802-808. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112148-20201118-00916.
3
[Combined prognostic value of serum lactic acid, procalcitonin and severity score for short-term prognosis of septic shock patients].[血清乳酸、降钙素原及严重程度评分对脓毒症休克患者短期预后的联合预测价值]
Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2021 Mar;33(3):281-285. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn121430-20201113-00715.
4
Predictive value of outcome scores in patients suffering from cardiogenic shock complicating AMI: APACHE II, APACHE III, Elebute-Stoner, SOFA, and SAPS II.急性心肌梗死并发心源性休克患者结局评分的预测价值:急性生理与慢性健康状况评分系统II(APACHE II)、急性生理与慢性健康状况评分系统III(APACHE III)、埃勒布特-斯通纳评分(Elebute-Stoner)、序贯器官衰竭评估(SOFA)及简化急性生理学评分II(SAPS II)
Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed. 2013 Nov;108(8):666-74. doi: 10.1007/s00063-013-0234-2. Epub 2013 Apr 6.
5
[Lactic acid, lactate clearance and procalcitonin in assessing the severity and predicting prognosis in sepsis].[乳酸、乳酸清除率及降钙素原在评估脓毒症严重程度及预测预后中的作用]
Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2020 Apr;32(4):449-453. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn121430-20200129-00086.
6
The Value of Soluble ST2 in Predicting Cardiorenal Syndrome Type 1 in Acute Myocardial Infarction Patients.可溶性 ST2 在预测急性心肌梗死患者 1 型心肾综合征中的价值。
Heart Surg Forum. 2023 Oct 25;26(5):E584-E591. doi: 10.59958/hsf.6669.
7
[Predictive value of four different scoring systems for septic patient's outcome: a retrospective analysis with 311 patients].[四种不同评分系统对脓毒症患者预后的预测价值:311例患者的回顾性分析]
Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2017 Feb;29(2):133-138. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.2095-4352.2017.02.008.
8
[Predictive value of early phrase echocardiography and cardiac biological markers in patients with severe sepsis: a five-year single-center retrospective study].[早期超声心动图及心脏生物标志物对严重脓毒症患者的预测价值:一项为期五年的单中心回顾性研究]
Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2018 Apr;30(4):332-336. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.2095-4352.2018.04.009.
9
[Dynamic measurement of volume of atelectasis area in the evaluation of the prognosis of patients with moderate-to-severe acute respiratory distress syndrome].[动态测量肺不张面积在中重度急性呼吸窘迫综合征患者预后评估中的应用]
Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2020 Sep;32(9):1056-1060. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn121430-20191219-00056.
10
[A 180-day mortality predictive score based on frailty syndrome in elderly patients with sepsis: a Logistic regression analysis model].基于脓毒症老年患者衰弱综合征的180天死亡率预测评分:Logistic回归分析模型
Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2021 Mar;33(3):257-262. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn121430-20201027-00688.

引用本文的文献

1
Predictor and prognostic modeling in cardiorenal syndrome type 2: a retrospective study of multicenter.2型心肾综合征的预测指标与预后模型:一项多中心回顾性研究
Biomark Med. 2025 Jun;19(12):491-499. doi: 10.1080/17520363.2025.2520738. Epub 2025 Jun 16.

本文引用的文献

1
Cardiorenal Syndrome: New Pathways and Novel Biomarkers.心肾综合征:新途径和新生物标志物。
Biomolecules. 2021 Oct 26;11(11):1581. doi: 10.3390/biom11111581.
2
Evidence based review of management of cardiorenal syndrome type 1.1型心肾综合征管理的循证综述
World J Methodol. 2021 Jul 20;11(4):187-198. doi: 10.5662/wjm.v11.i4.187.
3
Outcomes after Acute Peritoneal Dialysis for Critical Cardiorenal Syndrome Type 1.急性腹膜透析治疗 1 型心肾综合征的结局。
Cardiorenal Med. 2021;11(4):184-192. doi: 10.1159/000517362. Epub 2021 Jul 27.
4
Prognostic factors in patients treated with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation and continuous renal replacement therapy.体外膜肺氧合和持续肾脏替代治疗患者的预后因素。
Perfusion. 2022 Sep;37(6):570-574. doi: 10.1177/02676591211011039. Epub 2021 Apr 19.
5
Mortality prediction by SOFA score in ICU-patients after cardiac surgery; comparison with traditional prognostic-models.心脏手术后重症监护病房患者中序贯器官衰竭评估(SOFA)评分对死亡率的预测;与传统预后模型的比较
BMC Anesthesiol. 2020 Mar 13;20(1):65. doi: 10.1186/s12871-020-00975-2.
6
Investigate predictive capacity of in-hospital mortality of four severity score systems on critically ill patients with acute kidney injury.研究四种严重程度评分系统对急性肾损伤危重症患者院内死亡率的预测能力。
J Investig Med. 2019 Dec;67(8):1103-1109. doi: 10.1136/jim-2019-001003. Epub 2019 Oct 1.
7
Nomogram Model to Predict Cardiorenal Syndrome Type 1 in Patients with Acute Heart Failure.预测急性心力衰竭患者1型心肾综合征的列线图模型
Kidney Blood Press Res. 2018;43(6):1832-1841. doi: 10.1159/000495815. Epub 2018 Dec 7.
8
Combination of Amino-Terminal Pro- BNP , Estimated GFR , and High-Sensitivity CRP for Predicting Cardiorenal Syndrome Type 1 in Acute Myocardial Infarction Patients.氨基末端脑钠肽前体、估算肾小球滤过率和高敏 C 反应蛋白联合预测急性心肌梗死患者 1 型心肾综合征。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2018 Oct 2;7(19):e009162. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.118.009162.
9
Epidemiology of Cardiorenal Syndrome.心肾综合征的流行病学。
Adv Chronic Kidney Dis. 2018 Sep;25(5):391-399. doi: 10.1053/j.ackd.2018.08.009.
10
Epidemiology and Natural History of the Cardiorenal Syndromes in a Cohort with Echocardiography.超声心动图队列中心脏-肾脏综合征的流行病学和自然史。
Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2017 Oct 6;12(10):1624-1633. doi: 10.2215/CJN.04020417. Epub 2017 Aug 11.