Satzer David, Esengul Yasar T, Warnke Peter C, Issa Naoum P, Nordli Douglas R
Department of Neurosurgery, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, United States.
Department of Neurology, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, United States.
Front Neurol. 2022 Feb 8;13:782880. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2022.782880. eCollection 2022.
Stereo-electroencephalography (SEEG) uses a three-dimensional configuration of depth electrodes to localize epileptiform activity, but traditional analysis of SEEG is spatially restricted to the point locations of the electrode contacts. Interpolation of brain activity between contacts might allow for three-dimensional representation of epileptiform activity and avoid pitfalls of SEEG interpretation.
The goal of this study was to validate SEEG-based interictal source localization and assess the ability of this technique to monitor far-field activity in non-implanted brain regions.
Interictal epileptiform discharges were identified on SEEG in 26 patients who underwent resection, ablation, or disconnection of the suspected epileptogenic zone. Dipoles without (free) and with (scan) gray matter restriction, and current density (sLORETA and SWARM methods), were calculated using a finite element head model. Source localization results were compared to the conventional irritative zone (IZ) and the surgical treatment volumes (TV) of seizure-free vs. non-seizure-free patients.
The median distance from dipole solutions to the nearest contact in the conventional IZ was 7 mm (interquartile range 4-15 mm for free dipoles and 4-14 mm for scan dipoles). The IZ modeled with SWARM predicted contacts within the conventional IZ with 83% (75-100%) sensitivity and 94% (88-100%) specificity. The proportion of current within the TV was greater in seizure-free patients ( = 0.04) and predicted surgical outcome with 45% sensitivity and 93% specificity. Dipole solutions and sLORETA results did not correlate with seizure outcome. Addition of scalp EEG led to more superficial modeled sources ( = 0.03) and negated the ability to predict seizure outcome ( = 0.23). Removal of near-field data from contacts within the TV resulted in smearing of the current distribution ( = 0.007) and precluded prediction of seizure freedom ( = 0.20).
Source localization accurately represented interictal discharges from SEEG. The proportion of current within the TV distinguished between seizure-free and non-seizure-free patients when near-field recordings were obtained from the surgical target. The high prevalence of deep sources in this cohort likely obscured any benefit of concurrent scalp EEG. SEEG-based interictal source localization is useful in illustrating and corroborating the epileptogenic zone. Additional techniques are needed to localize far-field epileptiform activity from non-implanted brain regions.
立体定向脑电图(SEEG)使用深度电极的三维配置来定位癫痫样活动,但传统的SEEG分析在空间上仅限于电极触点的点位置。触点间脑活动的插值可能允许癫痫样活动的三维表示,并避免SEEG解释中的陷阱。
本研究的目的是验证基于SEEG的发作间期源定位,并评估该技术监测非植入脑区远场活动的能力。
在26例接受疑似致痫区切除、消融或离断手术的患者的SEEG上识别发作间期癫痫样放电。使用有限元头部模型计算无(自由)和有(扫描)灰质限制的偶极子以及电流密度(sLORETA和SWARM方法)。将源定位结果与无癫痫发作和有癫痫发作患者的传统刺激区(IZ)和手术治疗体积(TV)进行比较。
从传统IZ中偶极子解到最近触点的中位距离为7mm(自由偶极子的四分位间距为4 - 15mm,扫描偶极子为4 - 14mm)。用SWARM建模的IZ预测传统IZ内的触点,灵敏度为83%(75 - 100%),特异性为94%(88 - 100%)。无癫痫发作患者TV内的电流比例更高(P = 0.04),预测手术结果的灵敏度为45%,特异性为93%。偶极子解和sLORETA结果与癫痫发作结果无关。添加头皮脑电图导致建模源更浅(P = 0.03),并消除了预测癫痫发作结果的能力(P = 0.23)。从TV内的触点去除近场数据导致电流分布模糊(P = 0.007),并排除了癫痫发作自由度的预测(P = 0.20)。
源定位准确地表示了SEEG的发作间期放电。当从手术靶点获取近场记录时,TV内的电流比例区分了无癫痫发作和有癫痫发作的患者。该队列中深部源的高患病率可能掩盖了同步头皮脑电图的任何益处。基于SEEG的发作间期源定位有助于说明和证实致痫区。需要额外的技术来定位非植入脑区的远场癫痫样活动。