Department of Radiology, Emam Reza Hospital, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran.
Department of Radiology, SUNY Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, NY, USA.
Skeletal Radiol. 2022 Sep;51(9):1777-1785. doi: 10.1007/s00256-022-04016-6. Epub 2022 Feb 25.
To evaluate the diagnostic performance of susceptibility-weighted imaging (SWI) in identifying acute intraarticular hemorrhages and differentiating blood from other types of joint effusions.
Thirty-two patients (21 men, 11 women; mean age 38.7 ± 16.5 SD) clinically suspected of having joint effusion were prospectively included. All the patients underwent both conventional MRI and SWI. Two radiologists independently reviewed the conventional MRI images and scored the likelihood of intraarticular hemorrhage using a 5-level scoring system. Immediately thereafter, SWI images of each patient were also provided for the radiologists, and the scoring was repeated evaluating the conventional MRI and SWI images together. The patients underwent joint aspiration or surgical operation as the reference standard. The area under the curve (AUC) of conventional MRI and conventional MRI + SWI methods were calculated and compared. The weighted kappa analysis was used to evaluate the interobserver agreement.
Traumatic knee injury comprised the majority of study sample. Eighteen out of 32 of the patients were proven to have intraarticular hemorrhage. Using the conventional MRI, reader 1 and 2 achieved AUCs of 0.67 (p = 0.09) and 0.53 (p = 0.76), respectively. Following the addition of SWI, reader 1 and 2 achieved AUCs of 0.96 (p = 0.0001) and 0.95 (p = 0.0001), respectively, and interobserver agreement improved from Κ = 0.61 to Κ = 0.93. Accordingly, difference between the AUCs was 0.28 (p = 0.003) and 0.42 (p = 0.0001) for reader 1 and 2, respectively.
If confirmed by future studies, SWI enables the reliable and accurate diagnosis of acute intraarticular hemorrhages.
评估磁敏感加权成像(SWI)在识别急性关节内出血和区分血液与其他类型关节积液方面的诊断性能。
前瞻性纳入 32 例(21 名男性,11 名女性;平均年龄 38.7±16.5 岁)临床疑似关节积液的患者。所有患者均行常规 MRI 和 SWI 检查。两位放射科医生独立对常规 MRI 图像进行评估,并使用 5 级评分系统对关节内出血的可能性进行评分。此后,立即为每位患者提供 SWI 图像,两位放射科医生再次对常规 MRI 和 SWI 图像进行评分。以关节抽吸或手术作为参考标准。计算常规 MRI 和常规 MRI+SWI 方法的曲线下面积(AUC)并进行比较。采用加权 Kappa 分析评估观察者间的一致性。
研究样本中大多数为创伤性膝关节损伤。32 例患者中有 18 例证实存在关节内出血。使用常规 MRI,阅片 1 号和 2 号的 AUC 分别为 0.67(p=0.09)和 0.53(p=0.76)。加入 SWI 后,阅片 1 号和 2 号的 AUC 分别为 0.96(p=0.0001)和 0.95(p=0.0001),观察者间的一致性从 Κ=0.61 提高到 Κ=0.93。因此,阅片 1 号和 2 号的 AUC 差异分别为 0.28(p=0.003)和 0.42(p=0.0001)。
如果未来的研究能够证实,SWI 可用于可靠和准确地诊断急性关节内出血。