• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

不同级别胶质瘤患者瘤内磁化率信号的定量评估与半定量评估

Quantitative vs. semiquantitative assessment of intratumoral susceptibility signals in patients with different grades of glioma.

作者信息

Bhattacharjee Rupsa, Gupta Rakesh Kumar, Patir Rana, Vaishya Sandeep, Ahlawat Suneeta, Singh Anup

机构信息

Center for Biomedical Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Delhi, Delhi, India.

Philips Health System, Philips India Limited, Gurugram, India.

出版信息

J Magn Reson Imaging. 2020 Jan;51(1):225-233. doi: 10.1002/jmri.26786. Epub 2019 May 14.

DOI:10.1002/jmri.26786
PMID:31087724
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Susceptibility weighted imaging (SWI) provides vascular information and plays an important role in improving the diagnostic accuracy of preoperative glioma grading. Intratumoral susceptibility signal intensities (ITSS) obtained from SWI has been used in glioma grading. However, the current method for estimation of ITSS is semiquantitative, manual count-dependent, and includes hemorrhage as well as vasculature.

PURPOSE

To develop a quantitative approach that calculates the vasculature volume within tumors by filtering out the hemorrhage from ITSS using R * values and connected component analysis-based segmentation algorithm; to evaluate the accuracy of the proposed ITSS vasculature volume (IVV) for differentiating various grades of glioma; and compare it with reported semiquantitative ITSS approach.

STUDY TYPE

Retrospective.

SUBJECTS

Histopathologically confirmed 41 grade IV, 19 grade III, and 15 grade II glioma patients.Field Strength/Sequence: SWI (four echoes: 5.6, 11.8, 18, 24.2 msec) along with conventional MRI sequences (T -weighted, T -weighted, 3D-fluid-attenuated inversion recovery [FLAIR], and diffusion-weighted imaging [DWI]) at 3.0T.

ASSESSMENT

R * relaxation maps were calculated from multiecho SWI. The R * cutoff value for hemorrhage ITSS was determined. A segmentation algorithm was designed, based on this R * hemorrhage combined with connected component shape analysis, to quantify the IVV from all slices containing tumor by filtering out hemorrhages. Semiquantitative ITSS scoring as well as total ITSS volume (TIV) including hemorrhages were also calculated.

STATISTICAL TESTS

One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Tukey-Kramer post-hoc tests were performed to see the difference among the three grades of the tumor (II, III, and IV) in terms of semiquantitative ITSS scoring, TIV, and IVV. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was used to evaluate the performance of the three methods individually in discriminating between grades of glioma.

RESULTS

One-way ANOVA showed that only the proposed IVV significantly differentiated different grades of gliomas having visible ITSS. ROC analysis showed that IVV provided the highest AUC for the discrimination of grade II vs. III (0.93), grade III vs. IV (0.98), and grade II vs. IV glioma (0.94). IVV also provided the highest sensitivity and specificity for differentiating grade II vs. III (87.44, 98.41), grade III vs. IV (97.15, 94.12), and grade II vs. IV (98.72, 92.31).

DATA CONCLUSION

The proposed quantitative method segregates hemorrhage from tumor vasculature. It scores above the existing semiquantitative method in terms of ITSS estimation and grading accuracy.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

4 Technical Efficacy: Stage 2 J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2020;51:225-233.

摘要

背景

磁敏感加权成像(SWI)可提供血管信息,在提高术前胶质瘤分级诊断准确性方面发挥着重要作用。从SWI获得的肿瘤内磁敏感信号强度(ITSS)已用于胶质瘤分级。然而,目前估计ITSS的方法是半定量的,依赖手工计数,且包括出血和血管。

目的

开发一种定量方法,通过使用R*值和基于连通分量分析的分割算法从ITSS中滤除出血来计算肿瘤内的血管体积;评估所提出的ITSS血管体积(IVV)区分不同级别胶质瘤的准确性;并将其与报道的半定量ITSS方法进行比较。

研究类型

回顾性研究。

研究对象

41例经组织病理学证实的IV级、19例III级和15例II级胶质瘤患者。场强/序列:3.0T下的SWI(四个回波:5.6、11.8、18、24.2毫秒)以及传统MRI序列(T加权、T加权、三维液体衰减反转恢复序列[FLAIR]和扩散加权成像[DWI])。

评估

从多回波SWI计算R弛豫图。确定出血ITSS的R截止值。基于此R*出血并结合连通分量形状分析设计了一种分割算法,通过滤除出血来量化所有含肿瘤切片的IVV。还计算了半定量ITSS评分以及包括出血的总ITSS体积(TIV)。

统计检验

进行单因素方差分析(ANOVA)和Tukey-Kramer事后检验,以观察肿瘤的三个级别(II、III和IV)在半定量ITSS评分、TIV和IVV方面的差异。使用受试者操作特征(ROC)曲线分析分别评估这三种方法区分胶质瘤级别的性能。

结果

单因素方差分析表明,只有所提出的IVV能显著区分具有可见ITSS的不同级别胶质瘤。ROC分析表明,IVV在区分II级与III级(0.93)、III级与IV级(0.98)以及II级与IV级胶质瘤(0.94)方面提供了最高的曲线下面积(AUC)。IVV在区分II级与III级(87.44,98.41)、III级与IV级(97.15,94.12)以及II级与IV级(98.72,92.31)方面也提供了最高的敏感性和特异性。

数据结论

所提出的定量方法将出血与肿瘤血管区分开来。在ITSS估计和分级准确性方面,其得分高于现有的半定量方法。

证据水平

4 技术效能:2级 《磁共振成像杂志》2020年;51:225 - 233。

相似文献

1
Quantitative vs. semiquantitative assessment of intratumoral susceptibility signals in patients with different grades of glioma.不同级别胶质瘤患者瘤内磁化率信号的定量评估与半定量评估
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2020 Jan;51(1):225-233. doi: 10.1002/jmri.26786. Epub 2019 May 14.
2
Differentiation of grade II/III and grade IV glioma by combining "T1 contrast-enhanced brain perfusion imaging" and susceptibility-weighted quantitative imaging.联合“T1增强脑灌注成像”与磁敏感加权定量成像鉴别II/III级与IV级胶质瘤
Neuroradiology. 2018 Jan;60(1):43-50. doi: 10.1007/s00234-017-1942-8. Epub 2017 Oct 31.
3
Glioma grading by microvascular permeability parameters derived from dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI and intratumoral susceptibility signal on susceptibility weighted imaging.通过动态对比增强磁共振成像得出的微血管通透性参数以及磁敏感加权成像上的瘤内磁化率信号对神经胶质瘤进行分级。
Cancer Imaging. 2015 Mar 21;15(1):4. doi: 10.1186/s40644-015-0039-z.
4
Glioma grading using a machine-learning framework based on optimized features obtained from T perfusion MRI and volumes of tumor components.基于 T 灌注 MRI 优化特征和肿瘤成分体积的机器学习框架进行脑胶质瘤分级。
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2019 Oct;50(4):1295-1306. doi: 10.1002/jmri.26704. Epub 2019 Mar 20.
5
Diffusion-weighted MRI combined with susceptibility-weighted MRI: added diagnostic value for four common lateral ventricular tumors.扩散加权磁共振成像与磁敏感加权磁共振成像相结合:对四种常见侧脑室肿瘤的附加诊断价值
Acta Radiol. 2018 Aug;59(8):980-987. doi: 10.1177/0284185117738562. Epub 2017 Oct 24.
6
Susceptibility-Weighted Imaging of Glioma: Update on Current Imaging Status and Future Directions.胶质瘤的 susceptibility加权成像:当前成像现状与未来方向的更新。 (注:susceptibility一般译为“敏感性”“易感性”等,这里结合语境susceptibility-weighted imaging可能是“磁敏感加权成像”,原译文表述可能不太准确,但按照要求未做修改。)
J Neuroimaging. 2016 Jul;26(4):383-90. doi: 10.1111/jon.12360. Epub 2016 May 26.
7
Intergrating conventional MRI, texture analysis of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI, and susceptibility weighted imaging for glioma grading.整合传统磁共振成像、动态对比增强磁共振成像的纹理分析以及磁敏感加权成像用于胶质瘤分级。
Acta Radiol. 2019 Jun;60(6):777-787. doi: 10.1177/0284185118801127. Epub 2018 Sep 23.
8
Semiquantitative assessment of intratumoral susceptibility signals using non-contrast-enhanced high-field high-resolution susceptibility-weighted imaging in patients with gliomas: comparison with MR perfusion imaging.使用非增强高场高分辨率磁敏感加权成像对胶质瘤患者肿瘤内磁敏感信号进行半定量评估:与磁共振灌注成像的比较
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2009 Aug;30(7):1402-8. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A1593. Epub 2009 Apr 15.
9
Textural features of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI derived model-free and model-based parameter maps in glioma grading.基于模型和模型自由的动态对比增强 MRI 纹理特征参数图在胶质瘤分级中的应用。
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2018 Apr;47(4):1099-1111. doi: 10.1002/jmri.25835. Epub 2017 Aug 28.
10
Radiomics strategy for glioma grading using texture features from multiparametric MRI.基于多参数 MRI 纹理特征的脑胶质瘤分级放射组学策略。
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2018 Dec;48(6):1518-1528. doi: 10.1002/jmri.26010. Epub 2018 Mar 23.

引用本文的文献

1
Diagnostic Utility of Intratumoral Susceptibility Signals in Adult Diffuse Gliomas: Tumor Grade Prediction and Correlation with Molecular Markers Within the WHO CNS5 (2021) Classification.成人弥漫性胶质瘤瘤内易感性信号的诊断效用:肿瘤分级预测及与世界卫生组织中枢神经系统肿瘤分类第5版(2021年)中分子标志物的相关性
J Clin Med. 2025 Jun 5;14(11):4004. doi: 10.3390/jcm14114004.
2
Intra-tumoral susceptibility signals in brain gliomas: where do we stand?脑胶质瘤的瘤内药敏信号:我们目前的进展如何?
Front Radiol. 2025 Feb 20;5:1546069. doi: 10.3389/fradi.2025.1546069. eCollection 2025.
3
An update on susceptibility-weighted imaging in brain gliomas.
脑胶质瘤的磁共振磁敏感加权成像研究进展。
Eur Radiol. 2024 Oct;34(10):6763-6775. doi: 10.1007/s00330-024-10703-w. Epub 2024 Apr 6.
4
Advanced MR Techniques for Preoperative Glioma Characterization: Part 2.高级磁共振技术在术前胶质瘤特征描述中的应用:第二部分。
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2023 Jun;57(6):1676-1695. doi: 10.1002/jmri.28663. Epub 2023 Mar 13.
5
Grading of IDH-mutant astrocytoma using diffusion, susceptibility and perfusion-weighted imaging.使用弥散、磁化率和灌注加权成像对 IDH 突变型星形细胞瘤进行分级。
BMC Med Imaging. 2022 May 29;22(1):105. doi: 10.1186/s12880-022-00832-3.