• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

因子分析、稀疏 PCA 和基于排序差异之和的 Promethee-GAIA 多准则决策支持技术的改进。

Factor analysis, sparse PCA, and Sum of Ranking Differences-based improvements of the Promethee-GAIA multicriteria decision support technique.

机构信息

MTA-PE "Lendület" Complex Systems Monitoring Research Group, University of Pannonia, Veszprém, Hungary.

Department of Quantitative Methods, Faculty of Business and Economics, University of Pannonia, Veszprém, Hungary.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2022 Feb 25;17(2):e0264277. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0264277. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0264277
PMID:35213620
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8880814/
Abstract

The Promethee-GAIA method is a multicriteria decision support technique that defines the aggregated ranks of multiple criteria and visualizes them based on Principal Component Analysis (PCA). In the case of numerous criteria, the PCA biplot-based visualization do not perceive how a criterion influences the decision problem. The central question is how the Promethee-GAIA-based decision-making process can be improved to gain more interpretable results that reveal more characteristic inner relationships between the criteria. To improve the Promethee-GAIA method, we suggest three techniques that eliminate redundant criteria as well as clearly outline, which criterion belongs to which factor and explore the similarities between criteria. These methods are the following: A) Principal factoring with rotation and communality analysis (P-PFA), B) the integration of Sparse PCA into the Promethee II method (P-sPCA), and C) the Sum of Ranking Differences method (P-SRD). The suggested methods are presented through an I4.0+ dataset that measures the Industry 4.0 readiness of NUTS 2-classified regions. The proposed methods are useful tools for handling multicriteria ranking problems, if the number of criteria is numerous.

摘要

Promethee-GAIA 方法是一种多准则决策支持技术,它定义了多个准则的综合等级,并基于主成分分析(PCA)对其进行可视化。在存在大量准则的情况下,基于 PCA 双标图的可视化方法无法感知准则如何影响决策问题。核心问题是如何改进基于 Promethee-GAIA 的决策过程,以获得更具可解释性的结果,揭示准则之间更具特征的内在关系。为了改进 Promethee-GAIA 方法,我们提出了三种技术,这些技术可以消除冗余的准则,并清楚地说明哪个准则属于哪个因子,并探索准则之间的相似性。这些方法如下:A)具有旋转和共性分析的主成分分析(P-PFA),B)稀疏 PCA 与 Promethee II 方法的集成(P-sPCA),C)排序差异总和方法(P-SRD)。所提出的方法通过一个 I4.0+数据集呈现,该数据集衡量了 NUTS 2 分类区域的工业 4.0 准备情况。如果准则数量众多,这些方法是处理多准则排名问题的有用工具。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bbf0/8880814/7726e989895e/pone.0264277.g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bbf0/8880814/64006f73693b/pone.0264277.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bbf0/8880814/6a458ebec938/pone.0264277.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bbf0/8880814/710e079b8ecb/pone.0264277.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bbf0/8880814/5c6d2e267ee6/pone.0264277.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bbf0/8880814/746b835fc813/pone.0264277.g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bbf0/8880814/f0f8f3ce3a5b/pone.0264277.g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bbf0/8880814/295d9144ad25/pone.0264277.g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bbf0/8880814/2eb3deed3b67/pone.0264277.g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bbf0/8880814/4308f0e5c137/pone.0264277.g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bbf0/8880814/7726e989895e/pone.0264277.g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bbf0/8880814/64006f73693b/pone.0264277.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bbf0/8880814/6a458ebec938/pone.0264277.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bbf0/8880814/710e079b8ecb/pone.0264277.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bbf0/8880814/5c6d2e267ee6/pone.0264277.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bbf0/8880814/746b835fc813/pone.0264277.g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bbf0/8880814/f0f8f3ce3a5b/pone.0264277.g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bbf0/8880814/295d9144ad25/pone.0264277.g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bbf0/8880814/2eb3deed3b67/pone.0264277.g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bbf0/8880814/4308f0e5c137/pone.0264277.g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bbf0/8880814/7726e989895e/pone.0264277.g010.jpg

相似文献

1
Factor analysis, sparse PCA, and Sum of Ranking Differences-based improvements of the Promethee-GAIA multicriteria decision support technique.因子分析、稀疏 PCA 和基于排序差异之和的 Promethee-GAIA 多准则决策支持技术的改进。
PLoS One. 2022 Feb 25;17(2):e0264277. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0264277. eCollection 2022.
2
Sensitivity Analysis by the PROMETHEE-GAIA method: Algorithms evaluation for COVID-19 prediction.基于PROMETHEE-GAIA方法的敏感性分析:COVID-19预测算法评估
Procedia Comput Sci. 2022;199:431-438. doi: 10.1016/j.procs.2022.01.052. Epub 2022 Feb 3.
3
Application of multicriteria decision making methods to air quality in the microenvironments of residential houses in Brisbane, Australia.
Environ Sci Technol. 2004 May 1;38(9):2609-16. doi: 10.1021/es0304695.
4
Multicriteria Decision-Making Methods for Optimal Treatment Selection in Network Meta-Analysis.网络荟萃分析中最优治疗选择的多标准决策方法
Med Decis Making. 2023 Jan;43(1):78-90. doi: 10.1177/0272989X221126678. Epub 2022 Sep 17.
5
Multicriteria decision analysis in ranking of analytical procedures for aldrin determination in water.多准则决策分析用于水中艾氏剂测定分析方法的排序
J Chromatogr A. 2015 Mar 27;1387:116-22. doi: 10.1016/j.chroma.2015.02.009. Epub 2015 Feb 11.
6
Regional development potentials of Industry 4.0: Open data indicators of the Industry 4.0+ model.《工业 4.0 的区域发展潜力:工业 4.0+模型的开放数据指标》。
PLoS One. 2021 Apr 19;16(4):e0250247. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0250247. eCollection 2021.
7
Two-stage weighted PROMETHEE II with results' visualization.
Cent Eur J Oper Res. 2022;30(2):547-571. doi: 10.1007/s10100-021-00788-9. Epub 2021 Oct 27.
8
Multicriteria Decision Making in Supply Chain Management Using FMEA and Hybrid AHP-PROMETHEE Algorithms.使用 FMEA 和混合层次分析法-逼近理想解排序法的供应链管理中的多准则决策
Sensors (Basel). 2023 Apr 17;23(8):4041. doi: 10.3390/s23084041.
9
Implementation of the new easy approach to fuzzy multi-criteria decision aid in the field of management.新的模糊多准则决策辅助简易方法在管理领域的实施。
MethodsX. 2021 Apr 13;8:101344. doi: 10.1016/j.mex.2021.101344. eCollection 2021.
10
Selection of remedial alternatives for mine sites: a multicriteria decision analysis approach.矿山补救方案选择:一种多准则决策分析方法。
J Environ Manage. 2013 Apr 15;119:36-46. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2013.01.024. Epub 2013 Feb 26.

本文引用的文献

1
An integrated approach of PCA and PROMETHEE in spatial assessment of circular economy indicators.主成分分析(PCA)和 PROMETHEE 集成方法在循环经济指标的空间评估中的应用。
Waste Manag. 2021 Jun 1;128:154-166. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2021.04.057. Epub 2021 May 13.
2
Regional development potentials of Industry 4.0: Open data indicators of the Industry 4.0+ model.《工业 4.0 的区域发展潜力:工业 4.0+模型的开放数据指标》。
PLoS One. 2021 Apr 19;16(4):e0250247. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0250247. eCollection 2021.
3
Data describing the regional Industry 4.0 readiness index.
描述区域工业4.0就绪指数的数据。
Data Brief. 2020 Oct 27;33:106464. doi: 10.1016/j.dib.2020.106464. eCollection 2020 Dec.
4
Adaptive Weighted Sparse Principal Component Analysis for Robust Unsupervised Feature Selection.
IEEE Trans Neural Netw Learn Syst. 2020 Jun;31(6):2153-2163. doi: 10.1109/TNNLS.2019.2928755. Epub 2019 Aug 28.
5
Consistency of QSAR models: Correct split of training and test sets, ranking of models and performance parameters.定量构效关系(QSAR)模型的一致性:训练集和测试集的正确划分、模型排名及性能参数
SAR QSAR Environ Res. 2015;26(7-9):683-700. doi: 10.1080/1062936X.2015.1084647. Epub 2015 Oct 5.
6
Sum of ranking differences (SRD) to ensemble multivariate calibration model merits for tuning parameter selection and comparing calibration methods.用于集成多元校准模型的排名差异总和(SRD)在调整参数选择和比较校准方法方面具有优势。
Anal Chim Acta. 2015 Apr 15;869:21-33. doi: 10.1016/j.aca.2014.12.056. Epub 2015 Feb 7.
7
Multilinear sparse principal component analysis.多元稀疏主成分分析。
IEEE Trans Neural Netw Learn Syst. 2014 Oct;25(10):1942-50. doi: 10.1109/TNNLS.2013.2297381.
8
Common factor analysis versus principal component analysis: choice for symptom cluster research.常见因子分析与主成分分析:症状群研究的选择。
Asian Nurs Res (Korean Soc Nurs Sci). 2008 Mar;2(1):17-24. doi: 10.1016/S1976-1317(08)60025-0. Epub 2008 Dec 9.