Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada.
Crit Care Med. 2013 Mar;41(3):693-705. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3182758734.
Critically ill patients may develop bleeding caused by stress ulceration. Acid suppression is commonly prescribed for patients at risk of stress ulcer bleeding. Whether proton pump inhibitors are more effective than histamine 2 receptor antagonists is unclear.
To determine the efficacy and safety of proton pump inhibitors vs. histamine 2 receptor antagonists for the prevention of upper gastrointestinal bleeding in the ICU.
We searched Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, MEDLINE, EMBASE, ACPJC, CINHAL, online trials registries (clinicaltrials.gov, ISRCTN Register, WHO ICTRP), conference proceedings databases, and reference lists of relevant articles.
Randomized controlled parallel group trials comparing proton pump inhibitors to histamine 2 receptor antagonists for the prevention of upper gastrointestinal bleeding in critically ill patients, published before March 2012.
Two reviewers independently applied eligibility criteria, assessed quality, and extracted data. The primary outcomes were clinically important upper gastrointestinal bleeding and overt upper gastrointestinal bleeding; secondary outcomes were nosocomial pneumonia, ICU mortality, ICU length of stay, and Clostridium difficile infection. Trial authors were contacted for additional or clarifying information.
Fourteen trials enrolling a total of 1,720 patients were included. Proton pump inhibitors were more effective than histamine 2 receptor antagonists at reducing clinically important upper gastrointestinal bleeding (relative risk 0.36; 95% confidence interval 0.19-0.68; p = 0.002; I = 0%) and overt upper gastrointestinal bleeding (relative risk 0.35; 95% confidence interval 0.21-0.59; p < 0.0001; I = 15%). There were no differences between proton pump inhibitors and histamine 2 receptor antagonists in the risk of nosocomial pneumonia (relative risk 1.06; 95% confidence interval 0.73-1.52; p = 0.76; I = 0%), ICU mortality (relative risk 1.01; 95% confidence interval 0.83-1.24; p = 0.91; I = 0%), or ICU length of stay (mean difference -0.54 days; 95% confidence interval -2.20 to 1.13; p = 0.53; I = 39%). No trials reported on C. difficile infection.
In critically ill patients, proton pump inhibitors seem to be more effective than histamine 2 receptor antagonists in preventing clinically important and overt upper gastrointestinal bleeding. The robustness of this conclusion is limited by the trial methodology, differences between lower and higher quality trials, sparse data, and possible publication bias. We observed no differences between drugs in the risk of pneumonia, death, or ICU length of stay.
危重病患者可能会因应激性溃疡而发生出血。为预防应激性溃疡出血,常给患者开具胃酸抑制药物。质子泵抑制剂是否比组胺 2 受体拮抗剂更有效尚不清楚。
确定质子泵抑制剂与组胺 2 受体拮抗剂在预防 ICU 患者上消化道出血方面的疗效和安全性。
我们检索了 Cochrane 对照试验中心注册库、MEDLINE、EMBASE、ACPJC、CINHAL、在线临床试验注册库(clinicaltrials.gov、ISRCTN 注册库、世卫组织传染病临床研究平台)、会议论文集数据库以及相关文章的参考文献列表。
比较质子泵抑制剂与组胺 2 受体拮抗剂预防危重病患者上消化道出血的随机对照平行组试验,研究发表日期需早于 2012 年 3 月。
两名评审员独立应用纳入标准、评估质量并提取数据。主要结局指标为临床上显著的上消化道出血和显性上消化道出血;次要结局指标为医院获得性肺炎、ICU 死亡率、ICU 住院时间和艰难梭菌感染。我们联系了试验作者以获取其他或澄清信息。
共纳入了 14 项试验,总计纳入 1720 名患者。质子泵抑制剂在减少临床上显著的上消化道出血(相对风险 0.36;95%置信区间 0.19-0.68;p = 0.002;I = 0%)和显性上消化道出血(相对风险 0.35;95%置信区间 0.21-0.59;p < 0.0001;I = 15%)方面比组胺 2 受体拮抗剂更有效。质子泵抑制剂与组胺 2 受体拮抗剂在医院获得性肺炎(相对风险 1.06;95%置信区间 0.73-1.52;p = 0.76;I = 0%)、ICU 死亡率(相对风险 1.01;95%置信区间 0.83-1.24;p = 0.91;I = 0%)或 ICU 住院时间(平均差值-0.54 天;95%置信区间-2.20 至 1.13;p = 0.53;I = 39%)方面无差异。没有试验报告艰难梭菌感染。
在危重病患者中,质子泵抑制剂在预防临床上显著和显性上消化道出血方面似乎比组胺 2 受体拮抗剂更有效。这一结论的可靠性受到试验方法学、低质量和高质量试验之间的差异、数据稀疏以及可能存在的发表偏倚的限制。我们未观察到药物在肺炎、死亡或 ICU 住院时间方面的风险存在差异。