School of Nursing, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada (Ms Silva and Drs Woo, Galica, Wilson, and Luctkar-Flude); School of Nursing, Federal University of Santa Catarina, Santa Catarina, Brazil (Dr Padilha and Ms Petry); and Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada (Dr Silva E Silva).
ANS Adv Nurs Sci. 2022;45(3):197-208. doi: 10.1097/ANS.0000000000000418. Epub 2022 Feb 24.
Despite the availability of guidelines about the different types of review literature, the identification of the best approach is not always clear for nursing researchers. Therefore, in this article, we provide a comprehensive guide to be used by health care and nursing scholars while choosing among 4 popular types of reviews (narrative, integrative, scoping, and systematic review), including a descriptive discussion, critical analysis, and decision map tree. Although some review methodologies are more rigorous, it would be inaccurate to say that one is preferable over the others. Instead, each methodology is adequate for a certain type of investigation, nursing methodology research, and research paradigm.
尽管有关于不同类型的综述文献的指南,但护理研究人员并不总是清楚哪种方法最好。因此,在本文中,我们为医疗保健和护理学者提供了一个全面的指南,以帮助他们在选择 4 种流行的综述类型(叙述性综述、综合综述、范围综述和系统综述)时使用,包括描述性讨论、批判性分析和决策树。虽然一些综述方法更为严格,但说一种方法优于另一种方法是不准确的。相反,每种方法都适用于特定类型的调查、护理方法学研究和研究范式。