• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

罗氏电化学发光免疫分析法检测新型冠状病毒抗原在东南亚地区的评估与验证

Evaluation and Validation of the Roche Elecsys SARS-CoV-2 Antigen Electro-Chemiluminescent Immunoassay in a Southeast Asian Region.

作者信息

Lau Chin Shern, Phua Soon Kieng, Hoo See Ping, Jiang Boran, Aw Tar-Choon

机构信息

Department of Laboratory Medicine, Changi General Hospital, Singapore 529889, Singapore.

Department of Microbiology, Changi General Hospital, Singapore 529889, Singapore.

出版信息

Vaccines (Basel). 2022 Jan 27;10(2):198. doi: 10.3390/vaccines10020198.

DOI:10.3390/vaccines10020198
PMID:35214657
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8875833/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

SARS-CoV-2 antigen tests can complement and substitute for RT-PCR tests. Centralized laboratory automated SARS-CoV-2 antigen tests that can be scaled to process a large number COVID-19 cases simultaneously are now available. We have evaluated the new Roche Elecsys SARS-CoV-2 antigen electro-chemiluminescent immunoassay.

METHODS

The Roche SARS-CoV-2 antigen assay is a double-antibody sandwich electro-chemiluminescent immunoassay, which reports a cut-off index (COI) (COI ≥ 1.0 considered positive). We assessed assay precision and linearity, and confirmed the reactivity limit. We determined the assay sensitivity and specificity with a verification group (289 controls and 61 RT-PCR positive COVID-19 cases). Assay performance was also validated against the consecutive samples we received (7657 controls and 17 cases) for SARS-CoV-2 antigen testing from June to October 2021.

RESULT

The assay had a within-run precision CV of 3.0% at COI 0.68, and a CV of 1.5% at COI 3.49. Between-run precision was 3.0% at COI 0.68 and 1.8% at COI 3.49. The assay was linear from COI 0.65 to 7.84. All 35 C ± 20% test results performed over 7 days were positive/negative, respectively. In the verification group, overall sensitivity was 42.6% (26/61 positive, 95% CI 30.0-55.9), and specificity was 99.7% (1/289 positive, 95% CI 98.1-100). The agreement between the SARS-CoV-2 antigen and the RT-PCR cycle threshold (Ct) count was good (r = 0.90). In cases with Ct counts ≤ 30, the antigen assay sensitivity improved to 94.7% (18/19 positive, 95% CI 74.0-99.9). In our validation group, antigen sensitivity was 62.5% (5/8 antigen positive, 95% CI 24.5-91.5) within the first week of disease onset, but no cases were reactive after the first week of disease onset.

CONCLUSION

The Elecsys SARS-CoV-2 antigen assay has good performance within manufacturer specifications. The sensitivity of the Roche antigen assay was greatest when used in patients with lower RT-PCR Ct values (≤30) and within the first week of disease onset.

摘要

引言

严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2(SARS-CoV-2)抗原检测可作为逆转录聚合酶链反应(RT-PCR)检测的补充和替代方法。目前已有可扩展以同时处理大量2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)病例的集中实验室自动化SARS-CoV-2抗原检测方法。我们对新型罗氏电化学发光免疫分析法Elecsys SARS-CoV-2抗原检测进行了评估。

方法

罗氏SARS-CoV-2抗原检测是一种双抗体夹心电化学发光免疫分析法,报告截断指数(COI)(COI≥1.0视为阳性)。我们评估了检测的精密度和线性,并确定了反应性限度。我们使用一个验证组(289例对照和61例RT-PCR阳性的COVID-19病例)确定了检测的敏感性和特异性。还针对我们在2021年6月至10月期间收到的用于SARS-CoV-2抗原检测的连续样本(7657例对照和17例病例)验证了检测性能。

结果

该检测在COI为0.68时批内精密度变异系数(CV)为3.0%,在COI为3.49时CV为1.5%。批间精密度在COI为0.68时为3.0%,在COI为3.49时为1.8%。该检测在COI为0.65至7.84之间呈线性。在7天内进行的所有35次C±20%检测结果分别为阳性/阴性。在验证组中,总体敏感性为42.6%(61例阳性中的26例,95%置信区间30.0 - 55.9),特异性为99.7%(289例阳性中的1例,95%置信区间98.1 - 100)。SARS-CoV-2抗原与RT-PCR循环阈值(Ct)计数之间的一致性良好(r = 0.90)。在Ct计数≤30的病例中,抗原检测敏感性提高到94.7%(19例阳性中的18例,95%置信区间74.0 - 99.9)。在我们的验证组中,发病第一周内抗原敏感性为62.5%(8例抗原阳性中的5例,95%置信区间24.5 - 91.5),但发病第一周后无病例呈反应性。

结论

Elecsys SARS-CoV-2抗原检测在制造商规定的规格范围内具有良好性能。罗氏抗原检测在用于RT-PCR Ct值较低(≤30)且发病第一周内的患者时敏感性最高。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d173/8875833/e2e081a55bf4/vaccines-10-00198-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d173/8875833/3176d86938e4/vaccines-10-00198-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d173/8875833/360c1255988c/vaccines-10-00198-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d173/8875833/e2e081a55bf4/vaccines-10-00198-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d173/8875833/3176d86938e4/vaccines-10-00198-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d173/8875833/360c1255988c/vaccines-10-00198-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d173/8875833/e2e081a55bf4/vaccines-10-00198-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Evaluation and Validation of the Roche Elecsys SARS-CoV-2 Antigen Electro-Chemiluminescent Immunoassay in a Southeast Asian Region.罗氏电化学发光免疫分析法检测新型冠状病毒抗原在东南亚地区的评估与验证
Vaccines (Basel). 2022 Jan 27;10(2):198. doi: 10.3390/vaccines10020198.
2
Diagnostic performance of the Elecsys SARS-CoV-2 antigen assay in the clinical routine of a tertiary care hospital: Preliminary results from a single-center evaluation.Elecsys SARS-CoV-2 抗原检测在三级医院临床常规中的诊断性能:一项单中心评估的初步结果。
J Clin Lab Anal. 2021 Aug;35(8):e23906. doi: 10.1002/jcla.23906. Epub 2021 Jul 12.
3
Clinical performance of the Roche Elecsys SARS-CoV-2 antigen fully automated electrochemiluminescence immunoassay.罗氏Elecsys SARS-CoV-2抗原全自动电化学发光免疫分析的临床性能
Pract Lab Med. 2022 Mar;29:e00265. doi: 10.1016/j.plabm.2022.e00265. Epub 2022 Jan 15.
4
Evaluation of an Electrochemiluminescent SARS-CoV-2 Antibody Assay.一种电化学发光SARS-CoV-2抗体检测方法的评估
J Appl Lab Med. 2020 Nov 1;5(6):1313-1323. doi: 10.1093/jalm/jfaa134.
5
Comparison of SARS-CoV-2 antigen electrochemiluminescence immunoassay to RT-PCR assay for laboratory diagnosis of COVID-19 in Peshawar.白沙瓦地区 COVID-19 实验室诊断中 SARS-CoV-2 抗原电化学发光免疫分析与 RT-PCR 检测的比较。
Diagnosis (Berl). 2021 Aug 30;9(3):364-368. doi: 10.1515/dx-2021-0078. eCollection 2022 Aug 1.
6
Performance evaluation of Elecsys SARS-CoV-2 Antigen immunoassay for diagnostic of COVID-19.Elecsys SARS-CoV-2 Antigen 免疫检测试剂盒用于诊断 COVID-19 的性能评估。
J Med Virol. 2022 Mar;94(3):1001-1008. doi: 10.1002/jmv.27412. Epub 2021 Oct 29.
7
Evaluation of the Elecsys SARS-CoV-2 antigen assay for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 in nasopharyngeal swabs.评估 Elecsys SARS-CoV-2 抗原检测试剂盒用于检测鼻咽拭子中 SARS-CoV-2 的应用。
J Clin Virol. 2021 Nov;144:104991. doi: 10.1016/j.jcv.2021.104991. Epub 2021 Oct 1.
8
COI vs Ct: comparing automated antigen tests cut-off index (COI) to PCR cycle threshold (Ct).COI 与 Ct:比较自动抗原检测 cut-off 指数(COI)与 PCR 循环阈值(Ct)。
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2023 Jan;105(1):115805. doi: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2022.115805. Epub 2022 Aug 31.
9
[Evaluation of a Visually-Read Rapid Antigen Test Kit (SGA V-Chek) for Detection of SARS-CoV-2 Virus].[用于检测严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2(SARS-CoV-2)病毒的视觉读取快速抗原检测试剂盒(SGA V-Chek)的评估]
Mikrobiyol Bul. 2021 Jul;55(3):461-464. doi: 10.5578/mb.20219815.
10
Analytical and Clinical Evaluation of the Automated Elecsys Anti-SARS-CoV-2 Antibody Assay on the Roche cobas e602 Analyzer.罗氏 cobas e602 分析仪上全自动 Elecsys Anti-SARS-CoV-2 抗体检测的分析和临床评估。
Am J Clin Pathol. 2020 Oct 13;154(5):620-626. doi: 10.1093/ajcp/aqaa155.

引用本文的文献

1
Reflections on COVID-19: A Literature Review of SARS-CoV-2 Testing.关于新冠疫情的思考:严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2检测的文献综述
Vaccines (Basel). 2024 Dec 26;13(1):9. doi: 10.3390/vaccines13010009.
2
Clinical accuracy of instrument-based SARS-CoV-2 antigen diagnostic tests: a systematic review and meta-analysis.基于仪器的 SARS-CoV-2 抗原诊断检测的临床准确性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Virol J. 2024 Apr 29;21(1):99. doi: 10.1186/s12985-024-02371-5.
3
Automated antigen assays display a high heterogeneity for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern, including several Omicron sublineages.

本文引用的文献

1
Performance of a high-throughput, automated enzyme immunoassay for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 antigen, including in viral "variants of concern": Implications for clinical use.高通量、自动化酶免疫分析法检测 SARS-CoV-2 抗原的性能,包括对“关注变异株”的检测:对临床应用的影响。
J Clin Virol. 2022 Jan;146:105048. doi: 10.1016/j.jcv.2021.105048. Epub 2021 Nov 29.
2
Clinitest rapid COVID-19 antigen test for the diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection: A multicenter evaluation study.Clinitest 快速 COVID-19 抗原检测试剂盒用于 SARS-CoV-2 感染的诊断:一项多中心评估研究。
J Clin Virol. 2021 Oct;143:104961. doi: 10.1016/j.jcv.2021.104961. Epub 2021 Aug 23.
3
自动化抗原检测在检测 SARS-CoV-2 关注变体方面表现出高度的异质性,包括几种奥密克戎亚谱系。
Med Microbiol Immunol. 2023 Oct;212(5):307-322. doi: 10.1007/s00430-023-00774-9. Epub 2023 Aug 10.
4
SARS-CoV-2 Antigen Testing Intervals: Twice or Thrice a Week?新型冠状病毒抗原检测间隔:一周两次还是三次?
Diagnostics (Basel). 2022 Apr 21;12(5):1039. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics12051039.
Time-course evaluation of the quantitative antigen test for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2: The potential contribution to alleviating isolation of COVID-19 patients.
严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒 2 定量抗原检测的时间进程评估:对缓解 COVID-19 患者隔离的潜在贡献。
J Infect Chemother. 2021 Nov;27(11):1669-1673. doi: 10.1016/j.jiac.2021.08.015. Epub 2021 Aug 14.
4
Performance of Qualitative and Quantitative Antigen Tests for SARS-CoV-2 Using Saliva.使用唾液进行SARS-CoV-2定性和定量抗原检测的性能
Infect Dis Rep. 2021 Aug 24;13(3):742-747. doi: 10.3390/idr13030069.
5
Comparison of four commercial, automated antigen tests to detect SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern.比较四种商业化的自动化抗原检测试剂对检测 SARS-CoV-2 关注变异株的效果。
Med Microbiol Immunol. 2021 Dec;210(5-6):263-275. doi: 10.1007/s00430-021-00719-0. Epub 2021 Aug 20.
6
A Real-World Comparison of SARS-CoV-2 Rapid Antigen Testing versus PCR Testing in Florida.佛罗里达州严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2型快速抗原检测与聚合酶链反应检测的真实世界比较
J Clin Microbiol. 2021 Sep 20;59(10):e0110721. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01107-21. Epub 2021 Aug 4.
7
Evaluation of a fully automated high-throughput SARS-CoV-2 multiplex qPCR assay with built-in screening functionality for del-HV69/70- and N501Y variants such as B.1.1.7.评估一种全自动高通量 SARS-CoV-2 多重 qPCR 检测方法,该方法具有内置的筛查功能,可检测德尔塔变异株 HV69/70 缺失和 N501Y 突变,如 B.1.1.7.
J Clin Virol. 2021 Aug;141:104894. doi: 10.1016/j.jcv.2021.104894. Epub 2021 Jun 12.
8
Evaluation of a laboratory-based high-throughput SARS-CoV-2 antigen assay for non-COVID-19 patient screening at hospital admission.基于实验室的高通量 SARS-CoV-2 抗原检测在入院非 COVID-19 患者筛查中的评估。
Med Microbiol Immunol. 2021 Jun;210(2-3):165-171. doi: 10.1007/s00430-021-00706-5. Epub 2021 Apr 15.
9
Handling and accuracy of four rapid antigen tests for the diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 compared to RT-qPCR.四种快速抗原检测试剂用于 SARS-CoV-2 诊断的性能比较及与 RT-qPCR 的准确性对比。
J Clin Virol. 2021 Apr;137:104782. doi: 10.1016/j.jcv.2021.104782. Epub 2021 Mar 3.
10
Insight into the practical performance of RT-PCR testing for SARS-CoV-2 using serological data: a cohort study.利用血清学数据洞察 SARS-CoV-2 的 RT-PCR 检测实际性能:一项队列研究。
Lancet Microbe. 2021 Feb;2(2):e79-e87. doi: 10.1016/S2666-5247(20)30200-7. Epub 2021 Jan 19.