• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒 2 定量抗原检测的时间进程评估:对缓解 COVID-19 患者隔离的潜在贡献。

Time-course evaluation of the quantitative antigen test for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2: The potential contribution to alleviating isolation of COVID-19 patients.

机构信息

Disease Control and Prevention Center, National Center for Global Health and Medicine, 1-21-1 Toyama, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, 162-8655, Japan; Emerging and Reemerging Infectious Diseases, National Center for Global Health and Medicine, Graduate School of Medicine, Tohoku University, 2-1 Seiryo-cho, Aoba-ku, Sendai City, Miyagi 980-8575, Japan.

Disease Control and Prevention Center, National Center for Global Health and Medicine, 1-21-1 Toyama, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, 162-8655, Japan.

出版信息

J Infect Chemother. 2021 Nov;27(11):1669-1673. doi: 10.1016/j.jiac.2021.08.015. Epub 2021 Aug 14.

DOI:10.1016/j.jiac.2021.08.015
PMID:34454833
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8363432/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The automated quantitative antigen test (QAT), which detects severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), is suitable for mass screening. However, its diagnostic capability differentiated by time from onset and potential contribution to infectivity assessment have not been fully investigated.

METHODS

A retrospective, observational study using nasopharyngeal swab specimens from coronavirus disease (COVID-19) inpatients was conducted using Lumipulse SARS-CoV-2 antigen test. Diagnostic accuracy was examined for the early (up to 10 days after onset) and late (over 10 days after onset) stages. Time-course QAT changes and reverse-transcription quantitative polymerase chain reaction tests results were displayed as locally estimated scatterplot smoothing curve, and receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) analysis was used to determine the appropriate cutoff value for differentiating the early and late stages.

RESULTS

We obtained 100 specimens from 68 COVID-19 patients, including 51 early-stage and 49 late-stage specimens. QAT sensitivity and specificity were 0.82 (0.72-0.90) and 0.95 (0.75-0.99) for all periods, 0.93 (0.82-0.98) and 1.00 (0.39-1.00) for the early stage, and 0.66 (0.48-0.82) and 0.93 (0.69-0.99) for the late stage, respectively. The ROC analysis indicated an ideal cutoff value of 6.93 pg/mL for distinguishing early-from late-stage specimens. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value for predicting the late stage were 0.76 (0.61-0.87), 0.76 (0.63-0.87), 0.76 (0.61-0.87), and 0.76 (0.63-0.87).

CONCLUSIONS

QAT has favorable diagnostic accuracy in the early COVID-19 stages. In addition, an appropriate cutoff point can potentially facilitate rapid identification of noncontagious patients.

摘要

简介

用于检测严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒 2(SARS-CoV-2)的自动化定量抗原检测(QAT)适用于大规模筛查。然而,其在发病时间上的诊断能力以及对传染性评估的潜在贡献尚未得到充分研究。

方法

使用 Lumipulse SARS-CoV-2 抗原检测对来自冠状病毒病(COVID-19)住院患者的鼻咽拭子标本进行回顾性、观察性研究。检测了早期(发病后 10 天内)和晚期(发病后 10 天以上)的诊断准确性。QAT 变化的时间过程和逆转录定量聚合酶链反应检测结果显示为局部估计散点平滑曲线,并使用接收者操作特征曲线(ROC)分析来确定区分早期和晚期的适当截断值。

结果

我们从 68 例 COVID-19 患者中获得了 100 份标本,其中 51 份为早期标本,49 份为晚期标本。QAT 的敏感性和特异性在所有时间段均为 0.82(0.72-0.90)和 0.95(0.75-0.99),早期阶段为 0.93(0.82-0.98)和 1.00(0.39-1.00),晚期阶段为 0.66(0.48-0.82)和 0.93(0.69-0.99)。ROC 分析表明,区分早期和晚期标本的理想截断值为 6.93 pg/mL。预测晚期的敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值和阴性预测值分别为 0.76(0.61-0.87)、0.76(0.63-0.87)、0.76(0.61-0.87)和 0.76(0.63-0.87)。

结论

QAT 在 COVID-19 的早期阶段具有良好的诊断准确性。此外,适当的截断值可能有助于快速识别非传染性患者。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/544b/8363432/e59b838c9c38/gr2_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/544b/8363432/4f4923f0e68b/gr1_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/544b/8363432/e59b838c9c38/gr2_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/544b/8363432/4f4923f0e68b/gr1_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/544b/8363432/e59b838c9c38/gr2_lrg.jpg

相似文献

1
Time-course evaluation of the quantitative antigen test for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2: The potential contribution to alleviating isolation of COVID-19 patients.严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒 2 定量抗原检测的时间进程评估:对缓解 COVID-19 患者隔离的潜在贡献。
J Infect Chemother. 2021 Nov;27(11):1669-1673. doi: 10.1016/j.jiac.2021.08.015. Epub 2021 Aug 14.
2
Prospective study of 1308 nasopharyngeal swabs from 1033 patients using the LUMIPULSE SARS-CoV-2 antigen test: Comparison with RT-qPCR.1033 例患者 1308 份鼻咽拭子的前瞻性研究:LUMIPULSE SARS-CoV-2 抗原检测与 RT-qPCR 的比较。
Int J Infect Dis. 2021 Apr;105:7-14. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2021.02.005. Epub 2021 Feb 5.
3
Viral load may impact the diagnostic performance of nasal swabs in nucleic acid amplification test and quantitative antigen test for SARS-CoV-2 detection.病毒载量可能会影响鼻拭子在用于检测严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2(SARS-CoV-2)的核酸扩增试验和定量抗原试验中的诊断性能。
J Infect Chemother. 2022 Nov;28(11):1590-1593. doi: 10.1016/j.jiac.2022.07.023. Epub 2022 Aug 8.
4
Clinical validation of quantitative SARS-CoV-2 antigen assays to estimate SARS-CoV-2 viral loads in nasopharyngeal swabs.临床验证定量 SARS-CoV-2 抗原检测法以估计鼻咽拭子中的 SARS-CoV-2 病毒载量。
J Infect Chemother. 2021 Apr;27(4):613-616. doi: 10.1016/j.jiac.2020.11.021. Epub 2020 Dec 3.
5
Comparison of automated SARS-CoV-2 antigen test for COVID-19 infection with quantitative RT-PCR using 313 nasopharyngeal swabs, including from seven serially followed patients.比较 313 例鼻咽拭子(包括 7 例连续随访患者)的自动化 SARS-CoV-2 抗原检测与定量 RT-PCR 对 COVID-19 感染的检测结果。
Int J Infect Dis. 2020 Oct;99:397-402. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2020.08.029. Epub 2020 Aug 12.
6
Evaluation of Lumipulse® G SARS-CoV-2 antigen assay automated test for detecting SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid protein (NP) in nasopharyngeal swabs for community and population screening.Lumipulse® G SARS-CoV-2抗原检测法用于社区和人群筛查中检测鼻咽拭子中SARS-CoV-2核衣壳蛋白(NP)的自动化检测评估。
Int J Infect Dis. 2021 Apr;105:391-396. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2021.02.098. Epub 2021 Feb 26.
7
Comparison of Roche and Lumipulse quantitative SARS-CoV-2 antigen test performance using automated systems for the diagnosis of COVID-19.罗氏和罗氏 Lumipulse 定量 SARS-CoV-2 抗原检测系统用于 COVID-19 诊断的性能比较。
Int J Infect Dis. 2021 Jul;108:263-269. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2021.05.067. Epub 2021 Jun 1.
8
Evaluation of performance of two SARS-CoV-2 Rapid IgM-IgG combined antibody tests on capillary whole blood samples from the fingertip.评价两种 SARS-CoV-2 快速 IgM-IgG 联合抗体检测试剂盒在指尖毛细血管全血样本中的性能。
PLoS One. 2020 Sep 17;15(9):e0237694. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0237694. eCollection 2020.
9
Analysis of a persistent viral shedding patient infected with SARS-CoV-2 by RT-qPCR, FilmArray Respiratory Panel v2.1, and antigen detection.采用 RT-qPCR、FilmArray 呼吸道Panel v2.1 和抗原检测对持续性病毒脱落感染 SARS-CoV-2 的患者进行分析。
J Infect Chemother. 2021 Feb;27(2):406-409. doi: 10.1016/j.jiac.2020.10.026. Epub 2020 Oct 29.
10
Efficacy and validity of automated quantitative chemiluminescent enzyme immunoassay for SARS-CoV-2 antigen test from saliva specimen in the diagnosis of COVID-19.自动化定量化学发光酶免疫分析法检测唾液样本中 SARS-CoV-2 抗原用于 COVID-19 诊断的功效和有效性。
J Infect Chemother. 2021 Jul;27(7):1039-1042. doi: 10.1016/j.jiac.2021.03.021. Epub 2021 Apr 2.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluating the Accuracy of Chest CT in Detecting COVID-19 Through Tracheobronchial Wall Thickness: Insights From Emergency Department Patients in Mid-2023.通过气管支气管壁厚度评估胸部CT检测2023年年中急诊科患者新型冠状病毒肺炎的准确性:见解
Cureus. 2024 Sep 11;16(9):e69161. doi: 10.7759/cureus.69161. eCollection 2024 Sep.
2
Viral load may impact the diagnostic performance of nasal swabs in nucleic acid amplification test and quantitative antigen test for SARS-CoV-2 detection.病毒载量可能会影响鼻拭子在用于检测严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2(SARS-CoV-2)的核酸扩增试验和定量抗原试验中的诊断性能。
J Infect Chemother. 2022 Nov;28(11):1590-1593. doi: 10.1016/j.jiac.2022.07.023. Epub 2022 Aug 8.
3
Temperature-Responsive Liposome-Linked Immunosorbent Assay for the Rapid Detection of SARS-CoV-2 Using Immunoliposomes.
用于使用免疫脂质体快速检测新型冠状病毒的温度响应脂质体连接免疫吸附测定法。
ACS Omega. 2022 Jul 21;7(30):26936-26944. doi: 10.1021/acsomega.2c03597. eCollection 2022 Aug 2.
4
Evaluation and Validation of the Roche Elecsys SARS-CoV-2 Antigen Electro-Chemiluminescent Immunoassay in a Southeast Asian Region.罗氏电化学发光免疫分析法检测新型冠状病毒抗原在东南亚地区的评估与验证
Vaccines (Basel). 2022 Jan 27;10(2):198. doi: 10.3390/vaccines10020198.
5
Comparison between Nasal and Nasopharyngeal Swabs for SARS-CoV-2 Rapid Antigen Detection in an Asymptomatic Population, and Direct Confirmation by RT-PCR from the Residual Buffer.鼻拭子和咽拭子在无症状人群中用于 SARS-CoV-2 快速抗原检测的比较,以及从剩余缓冲液中用 RT-PCR 直接确认。
Microbiol Spectr. 2022 Feb 23;10(1):e0245521. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.02455-21. Epub 2022 Feb 16.