Br J Audiol. 1986 May;20(2):157-64. doi: 10.3109/03005368609079010.
This paper presents the main findings of a review of the literature on leisure noise (sociacusis) published elsewhere (MRC Institute of Hearing Research, 1985). From this, it has been possible to draw certain limited conclusions, despite the research's generally poor design, methodology and reporting. Given that the present occupational hearing conservation programme in the U.K. is geared to levels of 90 dB(A), non-occupational noise exposure is unlikely to constitute a major source of noise-induced hearing loss in the U.K. population. The Review contains recommendations for research to fill gaps in the literature. Some of the most important questions remain unanswered or unasked even in the most heavily-researched categories such as amplified music. While sound levels have been fairly well described more attention needs to be paid to the often neglected parameters of leisure noise exposure, i.e. the numbers exposed and the patterns and durations of their exposures. The outstanding need in leisure noise research is for a large, random-sample, whole-population survey in the U.K. of the numbers exposed and the patterns of exposure to leisure noise in general and amplified music in particular.
本文介绍了对其他地方发表的关于休闲噪音(社会听觉)的文献综述的主要发现(医学研究委员会听力研究所,1985年)。尽管该研究的设计、方法和报告总体上存在不足,但从中仍有可能得出某些有限的结论。鉴于英国目前的职业听力保护计划针对的是90分贝(A)的水平,非职业性噪音暴露不太可能成为英国人群中噪音性听力损失的主要来源。该综述包含了填补文献空白的研究建议。即使在研究最为深入的类别(如放大音乐)中,一些最重要的问题仍未得到解答或甚至未被提出。虽然声音水平已得到相当充分的描述,但需要更多关注休闲噪音暴露中常常被忽视的参数,即暴露人数以及他们的暴露模式和持续时间。休闲噪音研究中迫切需要在英国进行一项大规模、随机抽样的全人群调查,以了解一般休闲噪音尤其是放大音乐的暴露人数和暴露模式。