Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Gilead Sciences, Foster City, CA, USA.
J Hepatol. 2022 Aug;77(2):332-343. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2022.02.016. Epub 2022 Feb 24.
BACKGROUND & AIMS: Chronic HBV is clinically categorized into 4 phases by a combination of serum HBV DNA levels, HBeAg status and alanine aminotransferase (ALT): immunotolerant (IT), immune-active (IA), inactive carrier (IC) and HBeAg-negative hepatitis (ENEG). Immune and virological measurements in the blood have proven useful but are insufficient to explain the interrelation between the immune system and the virus since immune dynamics differ in the blood and liver. Furthermore, the inflammatory response in the liver and parenchymal cells cannot be fully captured in blood.
Immunological composition and transcriptional profiles of core needle liver-biopsies in chronic HBV phases were compared to those of healthy controls by multiplex immunofluorescence and RNA-sequencing (n = 37 and 78, respectively) analyses.
Irrespective of the phase-specific serological profiles, increased immune-gene expression and frequency was observed in chronic HBV compared to healthy livers. Greater transcriptomic deregulation was seen in IA and ENEG (172 vs. 243 DEGs) than in IT and IC (13 vs. 35 DEGs) livers. Interferon-stimulated genes, immune-activation and exhaustion genes (ICOS, CTLA4, PDCD1) together with chemokine genes (CXCL10, CXCL9) were significantly induced in IA and ENEG livers. Moreover, distinct immune profiles associated with ALT elevation and a more accentuated immune-exhaustion profile (CTLA4, TOX, SLAMF6, FOXP3) were observed in ENEG, which set it apart from the IA phase (LGALS9, PDCD1). Interestingly, all HBV phases showed downregulation of metabolic pathways vs. healthy livers (fatty and bile acid metabolism). Finally, increased leukocyte infiltrate correlated with serum ALT, but not with HBV DNA or viral proteins.
Our comprehensive multi-parametric analysis of human livers revealed distinct inflammatory profiles and pronounced differences in intrahepatic gene profiles across all chronic HBV phases in comparison to healthy liver.
Immunological studies on chronic HBV remain largely restricted to assessment of peripheral responses due to the limited access to the site of infection, the liver. In this study, we comprehensively analyzed livers from a well-defined cohort of patients with chronic HBV and uninfected controls with state-of-the-art techniques, and evaluated the differences in gene expression profiles and inflammation characteristics across distinct disease phases in patients with chronic HBV.
慢性乙型肝炎(HBV)的临床分期是基于血清 HBV DNA 水平、HBeAg 状态和丙氨酸氨基转移酶(ALT)的综合评估,包括免疫耐受期(IT)、免疫激活期(IA)、非活动携带期(IC)和 HBeAg 阴性肝炎期(ENEG)。血液中的免疫和病毒学检测已被证明有用,但不足以解释免疫系统和病毒之间的相互关系,因为免疫动力学在血液和肝脏中存在差异。此外,肝脏和实质细胞中的炎症反应在血液中无法完全捕捉。
通过多重免疫荧光和 RNA 测序(分别为 n=37 和 n=78)分析,比较慢性 HBV 各期患者和健康对照者的核心针肝活检的免疫组成和转录谱。
与健康肝脏相比,无论血清学特征如何,慢性 HBV 患者的免疫基因表达和频率均增加。IA 和 ENEG 期(172 个与 243 个差异表达基因)的转录组失调程度明显大于 IT 和 IC 期(13 个与 35 个差异表达基因)。IA 和 ENEG 期的干扰素刺激基因、免疫激活和耗竭基因(ICOS、CTLA4、PDCD1)以及趋化因子基因(CXCL10、CXCL9)显著上调。此外,在 ENEG 期观察到与 ALT 升高相关的独特免疫谱和更明显的免疫耗竭谱(CTLA4、TOX、SLAMF6、FOXP3),这使其与 IA 期(LGALS9、PDCD1)区分开来。有趣的是,与健康肝脏相比,所有 HBV 期的代谢途径均下调(脂肪和胆汁酸代谢)。最后,白细胞浸润增加与血清 ALT 相关,但与 HBV DNA 或病毒蛋白无关。
我们对人类肝脏的综合多参数分析显示,与健康肝脏相比,所有慢性 HBV 期的炎症谱和肝内基因谱均存在明显差异。
由于无法获取感染部位肝脏的样本,因此本研究仅限于对慢性乙型肝炎患者的肝脏进行研究,无法推广到所有慢性乙型肝炎患者。