Department of Built Environment, School of Engineering, Aalto University, PO Box 15200, FI-00076 Aalto, Finland; Department of Environmental Technologies, INMAR-Marine Research Institute, Faculty of Marine and Environmental Sciences, University of Cádiz, Poligono Rio San Pedro s/n, Puerto Real, 11510 Cádiz, Spain.
Department of Built Environment, School of Engineering, Aalto University, PO Box 15200, FI-00076 Aalto, Finland; Department of Environmental Technologies, INMAR-Marine Research Institute, Faculty of Marine and Environmental Sciences, University of Cádiz, Poligono Rio San Pedro s/n, Puerto Real, 11510 Cádiz, Spain; Department of Chemical and Metallurgical Engineering, School of Chemical Engineering, Aalto University, Kemistintie 1, P.O. Box 16100, Espoo, FI-00076, Aalto, Finland.
Sci Total Environ. 2022 Jun 25;827:154086. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.154086. Epub 2022 Feb 23.
Solar disinfection (SODIS) is an inexpensive drinking water treatment method applied in tropical and sub-tropical low-income countries. However, it has been unclear whether it functions adequately also in colder climates. To investigate this issue, SODIS experiments were performed in the humid continental climate of Finland by exposing faecally contaminated drinking water to natural solar radiation at different water temperatures (8-23 °C) and UV intensities (12-19 W/m) in polyethylene (PE) bags. To establish an adequate benchmark, SODIS experiments with the same experimental design were additionally conducted in the Mediterranean climate of Spain in typical conditions of SODIS application (39 °C and 42 W/m). Out of all experiments, the highest coliform and enterococci inactivation efficiencies in terms of lowest required doses for 4-log disinfection (25 Wh/m and 60 Wh/m, respectively) were obtained in humid continental climate at the lowest studied mean water temperature (8-11 °C). Despite the low mean UV irradiance (19 Wh/m), 4-log disinfection of coliforms and enterococci were also reached fast in these conditions (1 h 27 min and 3 h 18 min, respectively). Overall, the doses required for disinfection increased as the water temperatures and UV intensities of the experiments rose. Disinfection of 4-logs (> 99.99%) of both bacteria was reached in all SODIS experiments within 6 h, suggesting SODIS could be a sufficient household water treatment method also in colder climates, unlike previously thought. The effects of different water temperatures on bacterial inactivation were also tested in the absence of sunlight. Together the obtained results indicate that while water temperatures below or close to the optima of coliforms and enterococci (~10 °C) alone do not cause inactivation, these temperatures may enhance SODIS performance. This phenomenon is attributed to slower bacterial metabolism and hence slower photorepair induced by the low water temperature.
太阳能消毒(SODIS)是一种廉价的饮用水处理方法,适用于热带和亚热带低收入国家。然而,在较寒冷的气候条件下,其是否能充分发挥作用尚不清楚。为了研究这个问题,在芬兰的湿润大陆性气候下进行了 SODIS 实验,将粪便污染的饮用水暴露在不同水温(8-23°C)和紫外线强度(12-19 W/m)下的聚乙烯(PE)袋中,利用自然太阳辐射进行处理。为了建立一个充分的基准,在西班牙的地中海气候下,在 SODIS 应用的典型条件下(约 39°C 和 42 W/m),进行了相同实验设计的 SODIS 实验。在所有实验中,在最低研究平均水温(8-11°C)下,在湿润大陆性气候下获得了最高的大肠菌群和肠球菌灭活效率(分别为最低 4 对数消毒所需剂量 25 Wh/m 和 60 Wh/m)。尽管平均紫外线辐照度较低(约 19 Wh/m),但在这些条件下,大肠菌群和肠球菌的 4 对数消毒也能快速实现(分别为 1 小时 27 分钟和 3 小时 18 分钟)。总体而言,随着实验水温的升高和紫外线强度的增加,消毒所需的剂量也会增加。在所有 SODIS 实验中,6 小时内都达到了 4 对数(>99.99%)以上的消毒效果,这表明 SODIS 不仅在热带和亚热带地区,而且在寒冷气候条件下也可能是一种足够的家庭水处理方法,这与之前的观点不同。实验还测试了不同水温对细菌灭活的影响,而无需阳光照射。获得的结果表明,虽然单独低于或接近大肠菌群和肠球菌的最佳温度(约 10°C)的水温不会导致失活,但这些温度可能会增强 SODIS 的性能。这种现象归因于低温引起的细菌代谢减缓,以及由此导致的光修复减缓。