Suppr超能文献

使用真实世界数据评估PD-(L)1抑制剂单药或联合铂类双药化疗在一线(1L)PD-L1高表达非鳞状非小细胞肺癌(Nsq-NSCLC)中的疗效。

Effectiveness of PD-(L)1 inhibitors alone or in combination with platinum-doublet chemotherapy in first-line (1L) non-squamous non-small-cell lung cancer (Nsq-NSCLC) with PD-L1-high expression using real-world data.

作者信息

Pérol M, Felip E, Dafni U, Polito L, Pal N, Tsourti Z, Ton T G N, Merritt D, Morris S, Stahel R, Peters S

机构信息

Medical Oncology, Centre Leon Berard, Lyon, France.

Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology, Barcelona, Spain.

出版信息

Ann Oncol. 2022 May;33(5):511-521. doi: 10.1016/j.annonc.2022.02.008. Epub 2022 Feb 23.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Anti-programmed cell death protein (death-ligand) 1 [PD-(L)1] therapy alone [cancer immunotherapy (CIT)-mono] or combined with platinum-based chemotherapy (CIT-chemo) is used as the first-line treatment for patients with metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Our study compared clinical outcomes with CIT-mono versus CIT-chemo in the specific clinical scenario of non-squamous (Nsq)-NSCLC with a high PD-L1 expression of ≥50% [tumor proportion score (TPS) or tumor cells (TC)].

METHODS

This was a retrospective cohort study using a real-world de-identified database. Patients with metastatic Nsq-NSCLC with high PD-L1 expression initiating first-line CIT-mono or CIT-chemo between 24 October 2016 and 28 February 2019 were followed up until 28 February 2020. We compared overall survival (OS) and real-world progression-free survival (rwPFS) using the Kaplan-Meier methodology. Hazard ratios (HRs) were adjusted (aHR) for differences in baseline key prognostic characteristics using the inverse probability of treatment weighting methodology.

RESULTS

Patients with PD-L1-high Nsq-NSCLC treated with CIT-mono (n = 351) were older and less often presented with de novo stage IV disease than patients treated with CIT-chemo (n = 169). With a median follow-up of 19.9 months for CIT-chemo versus 23.5 months for CIT-mono, median OS and rwPFS did not differ between the two groups [median OS: CIT-chemo, 21.0 months versus CIT-mono, 22.1 months, aHR = 1.03, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.77-1.39, P = 0.83; median rwPFS: CIT-chemo, 10.8 months versus CIT-mono, 11.5 months, aHR = 1.04, 95% CI 0.78-1.37, P = 0.81]. CIT-chemo showed significant and meaningful improvement in OS and rwPFS versus CIT-mono only in the never-smoker subgroup, albeit among a small sample of patients (n = 50; OS HR = 0.25, 95% CI 0.07-0.83, interaction P = 0.02; rwPFS HR = 0.40, 95% CI 0.17-0.95, interaction P = 0.04).

CONCLUSION

Except in the subgroup of never-smoker patients, sparing the chemotherapy in first-line CIT treatment does not appear to impact survival outcomes in Nsq-NSCLC patients with high PD-L1 expression.

摘要

背景

抗程序性细胞死亡蛋白(死亡配体)1[PD-(L)1]单药治疗[癌症免疫治疗(CIT)-单药]或联合铂类化疗(CIT-化疗)被用作转移性非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)患者的一线治疗。我们的研究在非鳞状(Nsq)-NSCLC且程序性死亡配体1(PD-L1)高表达(肿瘤比例评分(TPS)或肿瘤细胞(TC)≥50%)的特定临床情况下,比较了CIT-单药与CIT-化疗的临床结局。

方法

这是一项使用真实世界匿名数据库的回顾性队列研究。对2016年10月24日至2019年2月28日期间开始一线CIT-单药或CIT-化疗的高PD-L1表达的转移性Nsq-NSCLC患者进行随访,直至2020年2月28日。我们使用Kaplan-Meier方法比较总生存期(OS)和真实世界无进展生存期(rwPFS)。使用治疗权重逆概率方法对基线关键预后特征的差异调整风险比(HRs)以获得调整后风险比(aHR)。

结果

接受CIT-单药治疗的PD-L1高表达Nsq-NSCLC患者(n = 351)比接受CIT-化疗的患者(n = 169)年龄更大,初诊IV期疾病的情况更少。CIT-化疗的中位随访时间为19.9个月,CIT-单药为23.5个月,两组的中位OS和rwPFS无差异[中位OS:CIT-化疗为21.0个月,CIT-单药为22.1个月,aHR = 1.03,95%置信区间(CI)0.77 - 1.39,P = 0.83;中位rwPFS:CIT-化疗为10.8个月,CIT-单药为11.5个月,aHR = 1.04,95% CI 0.78 - 1.37,P = 0.81]。仅在从不吸烟亚组中,CIT-化疗与CIT-单药相比,OS和rwPFS有显著且有意义的改善,尽管该亚组患者样本量较小(n = 50;OS HR = 0.25,95% CI 0.07 - 0.83,交互作用P = 0.02;rwPFS HR = 0.40,95% CI 0.17 - 0.95,交互作用P = 0.04)。

结论

除从不吸烟患者亚组外,一线CIT治疗中不进行化疗似乎不会影响高PD-L1表达的Nsq-NSCLC患者的生存结局。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验