Suppr超能文献

帕博利珠单抗单药与联合化疗在PD-L1表达≥50%的转移性肺腺癌患者中的真实世界比较。

Real-world comparison of pembrolizumab alone and combined with chemotherapy in metastatic lung adenocarcinoma patients with PD-L1 expression ≥50.

作者信息

Hektoen H H, Tsuruda K M, Brustugun O T, Neumann K, Andreassen B K

机构信息

Department of Research, Cancer Registry of Norway, Norwegian Institute of Public Health Oslo, Norway; Department of Cancer Genetics, Institute for Cancer Research, Norwegian Radium Hospital, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway. Electronic address: https://twitter.com/HektoenHH.

Department of Research, Cancer Registry of Norway, Norwegian Institute of Public Health Oslo, Norway.

出版信息

ESMO Open. 2025 Apr 29;10(5):105073. doi: 10.1016/j.esmoop.2025.105073.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The frontline treatment of metastatic lung adenocarcinoma with high Programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression (≥50%) includes immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) either as monotherapy or combined with chemotherapy. The added benefit of chemotherapy in this context lacks direct comparison in head-to-head trials. We aimed to compare these two ICI treatment modalities both overall and within relevant patient subgroups in a real-world setting.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective, nationwide study included 410 individuals diagnosed in Norway during 2017 to 2021 with stage IV non-small-cell lung adenocarcinoma, PD-L1 expression ≥50%, and treated first line with the ICI pembrolizumab, either as monotherapy (n = 317) or in combination with platinum-based chemotherapy (n = 93). We analyzed early (6-month) and overall (3-year) risk of death after treatment initiation using Cox regression, adjusted for and stratified by sex, age, stage, PD-L1 expression, performance status, and education.

RESULTS

Patients treated with combination therapy had a higher median overall survival compared with monotherapy (22.6 months versus 14.2 months), and reduced risk of overall death, although not statistically significant after adjustment [hazard ratio (HR) 0.74, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.54-1.00]. However, the risk of early death was significantly lower in patients receiving combination therapy, even after adjustment (HR 0.41, 95% CI 0.23-0.76). Across most subgroups, patients receiving combination therapy had comparable or superior survival outcomes relative to those receiving monotherapy. Particularly noteworthy were the observed benefits from combination therapy over monotherapy among females, individuals with stage IVB disease, and those with PD-L1 expression exceeding 75%.

CONCLUSION

Our real-world study demonstrates that combination therapy with ICI and chemotherapy provides superior early survival benefits over monotherapy in PD-L1-high patients. Additionally, certain subgroups showed enhanced overall survival. These findings challenge current treatment practices and underscore the need for further validation to optimize patient selection for monotherapy versus combination therapy, in particular to reassess the role of PD-L1 in treatment decisions.

摘要

目的

程序性死亡配体1(PD-L1)高表达(≥50%)的转移性肺腺癌一线治疗包括免疫检查点抑制剂(ICI)单药治疗或与化疗联合使用。在这种情况下化疗的额外益处缺乏在直接比较的头对头试验中的数据。我们旨在在真实世界环境中比较这两种ICI治疗方式在总体人群以及相关患者亚组中的疗效。

材料与方法

这项全国性回顾性研究纳入了2017年至2021年期间在挪威诊断为IV期非小细胞肺腺癌、PD-L1表达≥50%且一线接受ICI帕博利珠单抗治疗的410例患者,其中单药治疗(n = 317)或联合铂类化疗(n = 93)。我们使用Cox回归分析治疗开始后的早期(6个月)和总体(3年)死亡风险,并根据性别、年龄、分期、PD-L1表达、体能状态和教育程度进行调整和分层。

结果

与单药治疗相比,接受联合治疗的患者中位总生存期更长(22.6个月对14.2个月),总体死亡风险降低,尽管调整后无统计学意义[风险比(HR)0.74,9%置信区间(CI)0.54 - 1.00]。然而,接受联合治疗的患者早期死亡风险显著更低,即使调整后也是如此(HR 0.(9%CI 0.23 - 0.76)。在大多数亚组中,接受联合治疗的患者相对于接受单药治疗的患者具有相当或更好的生存结果。特别值得注意的是,在女性、IVB期疾病患者以及PD-L1表达超过75%的患者中,联合治疗相对于单药治疗观察到了益处。

结论

我们的真实世界研究表明,在PD-L1高表达患者中,ICI与化疗联合治疗比单药治疗具有更好早期生存益处。此外,某些亚组显示总生存期延长。这些发现挑战了当前的治疗实践,并强调需要进一步验证以优化单药治疗与联合治疗的患者选择,特别是重新评估PD-L1在治疗决策中的作用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cd13/12088754/abc0a4824e83/gr1.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验