Cardenas Caroline, McGillen Patrick, Otalvaro-Acosta Laura, Golz Reece A, Nguyen Minh-Thuy, Drake Frederick Thurston, Clark Sunday, Sanchez Sabrina E
Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts.
Los Angeles County and University of Southern California Medical Center, Department of Surgery, Los Angeles, California.
J Surg Res. 2022 Jul;275:35-42. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2022.01.018. Epub 2022 Feb 23.
Multiple factors signifying higher social vulnerability, including lower socioeconomic status and minority race, have been associated with presentation with complicated appendicitis (CA). In this study, we compared the Social Vulnerability Index (SVI) of our population by appendicitis severity (uncomplicated appendicitis [UA] versus CA). We hypothesized that SVI would be similar between patients with UA and CA presenting to our institution, a safety-net hospital in a state with high healthcare insurance coverage.
We included all patients at our hospital aged 18 y and older who underwent appendectomy for acute appendicitis between 2012 and 2016. SVI values were determined based on the 2010 census data using ArcMap software. We used nonparametric univariate statistics to compare the SVI of patients with CA versus UA and multivariable regression to model the likelihood of operative CA.
A total of 997 patients met inclusion criteria, of which 177 had CA. The median composite SVI score for patients with CA was lower than for patients with UA (80% versus 83%, P = 0.004). UA was associated with higher socioeconomic (83% versus 80%, P = 0.007), household/disability (68% versus 55%, P = 0.037), and minority/language SVI scores (91% versus 89%, P = 0.037). On multivariable analysis controlling for age, sex, ethnicity, insurance status, relevant comorbidities, and chronicity of symptoms, there was an inverse association between SVI and the likelihood of CA (odds ratio 0.59, 95% confidence interval 0.4-0.87, P = 0.008).
In the setting of high healthcare insurance and a medical center experienced in caring for vulnerable populations, patients presenting with UA have a higher composite SVI, and thus greater social vulnerability, than patients presenting with CA.
多种表明社会脆弱性较高的因素,包括较低的社会经济地位和少数族裔,都与复杂性阑尾炎(CA)的表现相关。在本研究中,我们按阑尾炎严重程度(非复杂性阑尾炎[UA]与CA)比较了我们研究人群的社会脆弱性指数(SVI)。我们假设,在我们机构(一所位于医疗保险覆盖率高的州的安全网医院)就诊的UA患者和CA患者之间,SVI会相似。
我们纳入了2012年至2016年间在我院接受急性阑尾炎阑尾切除术的所有18岁及以上患者。SVI值根据2010年人口普查数据使用ArcMap软件确定。我们使用非参数单变量统计来比较CA患者与UA患者的SVI,并使用多变量回归来模拟手术治疗CA的可能性。
共有997名患者符合纳入标准,其中177例为CA。CA患者的综合SVI中位数得分低于UA患者(80%对83%,P = 0.004)。UA与较高的社会经济(83%对80%,P = 0.007)、家庭/残疾(68%对55%,P = 0.037)以及少数族裔/语言SVI得分(91%对89%,P = 0.037)相关。在对年龄、性别、种族、保险状况、相关合并症和症状持续时间进行多变量分析时,SVI与CA的可能性之间存在负相关(比值比0.59,95%置信区间0.4 - 0.87,P = 0.008)。
在医疗保险覆盖率高且有照顾弱势群体经验的医疗中心环境中,与CA患者相比,UA患者的综合SVI更高,因此社会脆弱性更大。