Estrella Josue B, Carmichael Heather, Myers Quintin W O, Lee Sterling, Velopulos Catherine G
School of Medicine, University of Colorado, Colorado, USA.
School of Medicine, University of Colorado, Colorado, USA; Department of Surgery, University of Colorado, Colorado, USA.
J Surg Res. 2021 Oct;266:405-412. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2021.04.031. Epub 2021 Jun 3.
Delays in obtaining care may lead to perforated appendicitis, increasing risk of morbidity and mortality. We previously explored the role of social determinants in patients undergoing cholecystectomy, finding that emergent presentation is associated with neighborhood Social Vulnerability Index (SVI). We hypothesize that social vulnerability is associated with increased incidence of perforated appendicitis.
We retrospectively identified patients presenting to our urban, academic hospital with acute appendicitis during a 9-month timeframe (11/2019 - 7/2020). Patients were classified as perforated or non-perforated. Patient SVI was determined using geocoding at the census tract level. Because rates of perforation were higher in older patients, we performed a subset analysis of patients ≥ 40 years.
190 patients were included. Patients with perforated appendicitis (n = 48, 25%) were older and were more likely to present to a clinic versus the emergency department (P = 0.009). Perforated patients had longer delay before seeking care (56% versus 6% with > 72 hours of symptoms, P < 0.001). However, there were no differences between groups in terms of sex, race/ethnicity, insurance type, language barrier, having a primary care physician, or any of the SVI subscales. Of patients ≥ 40 years, a higher proportion were perforated (28/80, 35%) despite similar rates of delayed care. In this cohort, higher overall SVI as well as the socioeconomic status and household composition/disability subscales were associated with perforation.
Contrary to our hypothesis, while perforation was associated with delayed care in this population, we did not find overall that social vulnerability or individual social determinants accounted for this delay.
获得治疗的延迟可能导致阑尾穿孔,增加发病和死亡风险。我们之前探讨了社会决定因素在接受胆囊切除术患者中的作用,发现急诊就诊与社区社会脆弱性指数(SVI)相关。我们假设社会脆弱性与阑尾穿孔发病率增加有关。
我们回顾性确定了在9个月时间内(2019年11月至2020年7月)到我们城市的学术医院就诊的急性阑尾炎患者。患者被分为穿孔性或非穿孔性。使用人口普查区层面的地理编码确定患者的SVI。由于老年患者的穿孔率较高,我们对40岁及以上的患者进行了亚组分析。
纳入了190例患者。穿孔性阑尾炎患者(n = 48,25%)年龄较大,与急诊科相比更有可能在诊所就诊(P = 0.009)。穿孔患者在寻求治疗前的延迟时间更长(症状出现超过72小时的患者中,穿孔患者占56%,而非穿孔患者占6%,P < 0.001)。然而,两组在性别、种族/民族、保险类型、语言障碍、是否有初级保健医生或任何SVI子量表方面没有差异。在40岁及以上的患者中,尽管延迟治疗率相似,但穿孔的比例更高(28/80,35%)。在该队列中,较高的总体SVI以及社会经济地位和家庭构成/残疾子量表与穿孔有关。
与我们的假设相反,虽然在该人群中穿孔与延迟治疗有关,但我们总体上没有发现社会脆弱性或个体社会决定因素导致了这种延迟。