Suppr超能文献

尼森胃底折叠术失败后的长期结果。

Long-term outcomes following failure of Nissen fundoplication.

机构信息

Great Ormond Street Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.

UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, London, UK.

出版信息

Pediatr Surg Int. 2022 May;38(5):707-712. doi: 10.1007/s00383-022-05098-y. Epub 2022 Feb 26.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To determine the management and outcomes of patients with gastro-oesophageal reflux (GOR) that requires further intervention following failure of Nissen fundoplication (NF).

METHODS

After institutional audit department approval, a retrospective review of paediatric patients who had further intervention following failure of primary NF between January 2006 and December 2015 for GOR at our centre was performed. Data are presented as median (range).

RESULTS

Of 820 patients who underwent NF, 190 (23%) received further procedures for GOR management at a median of 21 months of age (6-186); 90/190 (47%) had gastro-jejunal feeding (GJ). Of these, 67 (74%) remained on GJ feeds up to a median of 48 months and 23/90 (26%) had a second NF after GJ feeding. 97/190 (51%) had a redo fundoplication without having had a GJ; thus, 120/190 (63%) of patients having a further procedure went on to have a second NF after a median period of 15 months (1-70 months). Three patients (2%) had early emergency wrap revision 4 days after first fundoplication (we classed this as an 'early complication'). Of the seven patients who failed a 3rd NF, 4 continued GJ feeding, 2 of had oesophagogastric dissociation; 2 had 4th NF of which 1 was successful and 1 patient had gastric pacemaker and is successfully feeding orally. Patients who were finally successfully managed with GJ underwent 2 (2-5) tube changes/year. We found patients who had a previous GJ were more likely to have failure of the redo fundoplication than those who had not to have the GJ (16/24 vs. 30/90, p = 0.005).

CONCLUSION

The chance of success decreases with every further attempt at fundoplication. The only factor significantly associated with failure of redo fundoplication was whether the patient previously had a GJ tube. In patients with failed fundoplications, when symptom free on jejunal feedings, further anti-reflux surgical intervention should be avoided. A randomized prospective study is needed for patient selection.

摘要

目的

确定尼森胃底折叠术(NF)失败后需要进一步干预的胃食管反流(GOR)患者的治疗和结果。

方法

在获得机构审计部门批准后,我们对 2006 年 1 月至 2015 年 12 月期间在本中心因 GOR 而接受 NF 治疗失败后进一步干预的儿科患者进行了回顾性研究。数据以中位数(范围)表示。

结果

在 820 例接受 NF 的患者中,190 例(23%)在中位年龄为 21 个月(6-186 岁)时因 GOR 接受了进一步的治疗;90/190(47%)有胃空肠喂养(GJ)。其中,67 例(74%)GJ 喂养中位时间为 48 个月,23/90(26%)在 GJ 喂养后进行了第二次 NF。97/190(51%)进行了翻修胃底折叠术,而没有进行 GJ 喂养;因此,120/190(63%)接受进一步治疗的患者在中位时间为 15 个月(1-70 个月)后再次接受 NF。3 例(2%)在首次胃底折叠术 4 天后紧急行早期包裹修复(我们将其归类为“早期并发症”)。在 7 例 NF 治疗失败的患者中,4 例继续接受 GJ 喂养,2 例发生食管胃分离;2 例行第 4 次 NF,其中 1 例成功,1 例患者行胃起搏器治疗,口服喂养成功。最终通过 GJ 成功管理的患者每年需要更换 2(2-5)根导管。我们发现,与未进行 GJ 治疗的患者相比,先前有 GJ 治疗的患者再次行胃底折叠术的成功率更低(16/24 比 30/90,p=0.005)。

结论

随着胃底折叠术的进一步尝试,成功的机会会降低。唯一与再次胃底折叠术失败显著相关的因素是患者是否曾接受 GJ 管治疗。在胃底折叠术失败的患者中,如果在接受空肠喂养时无症状,应避免进一步的抗反流手术干预。需要进行前瞻性随机研究以选择患者。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验