Suppr超能文献

采用定量培养和冲洗技术的咳出痰液细菌学与经气管吸出物的比较

Bacteriology of expectorated sputum with quantitative culture and wash technique compared to transtracheal aspirates.

作者信息

Bartlett J G, Finegold S M

出版信息

Am Rev Respir Dis. 1978 Jun;117(6):1019-27. doi: 10.1164/arrd.1978.117.6.1019.

Abstract

Techniques to improve the reliability of expectorated sputum culture were evaluated in 46 patients using a wash technique, quantitative culture, and a combination of washing and quantification. The wash procedure consisted of a jet of tap water over the specimen contained in a tea strainer. The true lower respiratory tract flora was determined by percutaneous transtracheal aspirates, which served as the basis for evaluating the methods of processing expectorated specimens. Either washing alone or quantification alone decreased the number of specimens with organisms that were not present in companion transtracheal aspirates; however, results that were sufficiently improved to be clearly advantageous for clinical interpretation were achieved only when washing and quantification were combined. Washed sputum specimens yielded oropharyngeal "contaminants" in concentrations exceeding 10(6) bacteria per ml in 12 of 46 specimens (26 per cent). Using this technique, only one specimen contained a misleading potential pathogen, and only one specimen failed to yield a potential pathogen that was recovered with the transtracheal aspirate. The wash procedure decreased the mean concentrations of contaminants approximately 100-fold for all specimens and 1,000-fold for purulent specimens.

摘要

在46例患者中,采用冲洗技术、定量培养以及冲洗与定量相结合的方法,对提高咳出痰培养可靠性的技术进行了评估。冲洗步骤包括用一股自来水冲洗置于滤茶器中的标本。经皮经气管抽吸物确定了真正的下呼吸道菌群,以此作为评估咳出标本处理方法的依据。单独冲洗或单独定量都减少了伴有经气管抽吸物中不存在的微生物的标本数量;然而,只有当冲洗和定量相结合时,结果才得到充分改善,对临床解释具有明显优势。在46份标本中的12份(26%)中,冲洗后的痰标本产生的口咽“污染物”浓度超过每毫升10⁶个细菌。使用该技术,只有一份标本含有可能产生误导的潜在病原体,只有一份标本未能培养出经气管抽吸物中发现的潜在病原体。冲洗步骤使所有标本中污染物的平均浓度降低了约100倍,脓性标本降低了1000倍。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验