Department of RadiologySection of Vascular and Interventional RadiologyNorthwestern UniversityChicagoIllinoisUSA.
Department of SurgeryDivision of Transplant SurgeryNorthwestern UniversityChicagoIllinoisUSA.
Hepatol Commun. 2022 Jul;6(7):1803-1812. doi: 10.1002/hep4.1914. Epub 2022 Feb 27.
High-grade portal vein thrombosis (PVT) is often considered to be a technically challenging scenario for liver transplantation (LT) and in some centers a relative contraindication. This study compares patients with chronic obliterative PVT who underwent portal vein recanalization-transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (PVR-TIPS) and subsequent LT to those with partial nonocclusive PVT who underwent LT without an intervention. This institutional review board-approved study analyzed 49 patients with cirrhosis with PVT from 2000 to 2020 at our institution. Patients were divided into two groups, those that received PVR-TIPS due to anticipated surgical challenges from chronic obliterative PVT and those who did not because of partial PVT. Demographic data and long-term outcomes were compared. A total of 35 patients received PVR-TIPS while 14 did not, with all receiving LT. Patients with PVR-TIPS had a higher Yerdel score and frequency of cavernoma than those that did not. PVR-TIPS was effective in decreasing portosystemic gradient (16 down to 8 mm HG; p < 0.05). Both groups allowed for end-to-end anastomoses in >90% of cases. However, veno-veno bypass was used significantly more in patients who did not receive PVR-TIPS. Additionally, patients without PVR-TIPS required significantly more intraoperative red blood cells. Overall survival was not different between groups. PVR-TIPS demonstrated efficacy in resolving PVT and allowed for end-to-end portal vein anastomoses. PVR-TIPS is a viable treatment option for chronic obliterative PVT with or without cavernoma that simplifies the surgical aspects of LT.
高等级门静脉血栓形成(PVT)通常被认为是肝移植(LT)的技术难题,在某些中心是相对禁忌证。本研究比较了接受门静脉再通-经颈静脉肝内门体分流术(PVR-TIPS)和随后 LT 的慢性闭塞性 PVT 患者与接受 LT 而未进行干预的部分非闭塞性 PVT 患者。这项经机构审查委员会批准的研究分析了 2000 年至 2020 年在我院因 PVT 导致肝硬化的 49 例患者。患者分为两组,一组因慢性闭塞性 PVT 预计手术挑战而接受 PVR-TIPS,另一组因部分 PVT 而未接受 PVR-TIPS。比较了人口统计学数据和长期结果。共有 35 例患者接受了 PVR-TIPS,14 例患者未接受,所有患者均接受了 LT。接受 PVR-TIPS 的患者 Yerdel 评分和海绵状变发生率高于未接受 PVR-TIPS 的患者。PVR-TIPS 可有效降低门脉系统梯度(从 16 降至 8mmHg;p < 0.05)。两组患者>90%的病例均可行端端吻合。然而,未接受 PVR-TIPS 的患者更常使用静脉-静脉旁路。此外,未接受 PVR-TIPS 的患者术中需要输注更多的红细胞。两组患者的总体生存率无差异。PVR-TIPS 可有效治疗 PVT,并可进行端端门静脉吻合。PVR-TIPS 是治疗伴有或不伴有海绵状变的慢性闭塞性 PVT 的可行治疗选择,可简化 LT 的手术方面。