• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

对性罪犯的态度对专业人员和学生风险判断的影响。

The Effect of Attitudes Towards Individuals with Sexual Convictions on Professional and Student Risk Judgments.

机构信息

6122Nottingham Trent University (UK), Nottingham, UK.

Nottinghamshire Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust, Nottingham, UK.

出版信息

Sex Abuse. 2022 Dec;34(8):948-972. doi: 10.1177/10790632211070799. Epub 2022 Feb 28.

DOI:10.1177/10790632211070799
PMID:35220820
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9643808/
Abstract

Attitudes towards individuals with sexual convictions is an area with growing research interest, but the effects of such attitudes on professional judgments is largely unexplored. What is known from the existing literature is that attitudes guide the interpretation of sexual crime related information, which cascade into potential biased or heuristically driven judgments. In this study we recruited samples of both students ( = 341) and forensic professionals ( = 186) to explore whether attitudes towards individuals with sexual convictions predicted risk judgments of hypothetical sexual offense scenarios, and whether this relationship is moderated by professional status or perpetrator characteristics. Forensic professionals expressed more positive attitudes overall, but the significant effect of attitudes on risk judgments was consistent between participant groups and was not moderated by perpetrator age or sex. We suggest that relying on attitudes as a basis for risk judgments opens the door to incorrect (and potentially dangerous) decision-making and discuss our data in terms of their potential clinical implications. An open-access preprint of this work is available at https://psyarxiv.com/rjt5h/.

摘要

对具有性犯罪倾向的个体的态度是一个研究兴趣日益增长的领域,但这种态度对专业判断的影响在很大程度上尚未得到探索。现有文献中已知的是,态度指导着对与性犯罪相关信息的解释,这种解释会逐渐导致潜在的有偏差或启发式驱动的判断。在这项研究中,我们招募了学生样本(n=341)和法医专业人员样本(n=186),以探讨对具有性犯罪倾向的个体的态度是否可以预测假设的性犯罪场景的风险判断,以及这种关系是否受到专业地位或犯罪者特征的调节。法医专业人员总体上表现出更积极的态度,但态度对风险判断的显著影响在参与者群体之间是一致的,并且不受犯罪者年龄或性别的调节。我们认为,将态度作为风险判断的基础可能会导致错误(且潜在危险)的决策,并根据其潜在的临床意义讨论我们的数据。这项工作的预印本可在 https://psyarxiv.com/rjt5h/ 上获取。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4752/9643808/06f979e8bdc1/10.1177_10790632211070799-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4752/9643808/06f979e8bdc1/10.1177_10790632211070799-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4752/9643808/06f979e8bdc1/10.1177_10790632211070799-fig1.jpg

相似文献

1
The Effect of Attitudes Towards Individuals with Sexual Convictions on Professional and Student Risk Judgments.对性罪犯的态度对专业人员和学生风险判断的影响。
Sex Abuse. 2022 Dec;34(8):948-972. doi: 10.1177/10790632211070799. Epub 2022 Feb 28.
2
Unveiling the Elephant in the Room: How do Psychologists Perceive Individuals Convicted of Sexual Offenses?
Sex Abuse. 2025 Jun;37(4):476-498. doi: 10.1177/10790632241268457. Epub 2024 Jul 24.
3
Implicit Theories and Offender Representativeness in Judgments About Sexual Crime.性犯罪判决中的内隐理论与犯罪者代表性
Sex Abuse. 2018 Apr;30(3):276-295. doi: 10.1177/1079063216658019. Epub 2016 Jul 1.
4
Beauty and the Eye of the Beholder: Gender and Attractiveness Affect Judgments in Teacher Sex Offense Cases.美与旁观者之眼:性别与吸引力对教师性犯罪案件判决的影响
Sex Abuse. 2017 Jun;29(4):375-395. doi: 10.1177/1079063215597646. Epub 2015 Aug 3.
5
Bounded Blame: The Effects of Victim-Perpetrator Relationship and Victimization History on Judgments of Sexual Violence.有界责任:受害者-加害者关系和受害史对性暴力判断的影响。
J Interpers Violence. 2021 Aug;36(15-16):NP8800-NP8823. doi: 10.1177/0886260519846863. Epub 2019 May 3.
6
Who Is the Rotten Apple? Mock Jurors' Views of Teacher-Student Sexual Contact.谁是害群之马?模拟陪审员对师生性接触的看法。
J Interpers Violence. 2018 May;33(9):1449-1471. doi: 10.1177/0886260515618214. Epub 2015 Nov 29.
7
The Effects of Victim and Perpetrator Characteristics on Ratings of Guilt in a Sexual Assault Case.受害者和加害者特征对性侵犯案件中罪责评定的影响。
Violence Against Women. 2020 May;26(6-7):614-635. doi: 10.1177/1077801219840439. Epub 2019 Apr 4.
8
Tipping the Scales: Effects of Gender, Rape Myth Acceptance, and Anti-Fat Attitudes on Judgments of Sexual Coercion Scenarios.颠覆传统观念:性别、强奸谬论接受程度和反肥胖态度对性胁迫情景判断的影响。
J Interpers Violence. 2021 Oct;36(19-20):NP10178-NP10204. doi: 10.1177/0886260519872978. Epub 2019 Aug 31.
9
Unsafe sex: decision-making biases and heuristics.不安全的性行为:决策偏差与启发法
AIDS Educ Prev. 1993 Winter;5(4):294-301.
10
Effects of gender, rape-supportive attitudes, and explicit instruction on perceptions of women's momentary sexual interest.性别、支持强奸的态度以及明确指示对女性瞬间性兴趣认知的影响。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2017 Jun;24(3):979-986. doi: 10.3758/s13423-016-1176-5.

本文引用的文献

1
Factors Impacting upon Attitudes Toward Sex Offenders: The Role of Conservatism and Knowledge.影响对性犯罪者态度的因素:保守主义和知识的作用。
Psychiatr Psychol Law. 2017 Jan 16;24(4):496-515. doi: 10.1080/13218719.2016.1254562. eCollection 2017.
2
Development of a 21-item short form of the Attitudes to Sexual Offenders (ATS) Scale.开发一种 21 项简短版性犯罪者态度量表(ATS)。
Law Hum Behav. 2019 Feb;43(1):117-130. doi: 10.1037/lhb0000308. Epub 2018 Dec 17.
3
Prison Climate and Its Role in Reducing Dynamic Risk Factors During Offender Treatment.
监狱环境及其在罪犯矫治过程中降低动态风险因素方面的作用。
Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol. 2018 Oct;62(14):4609-4621. doi: 10.1177/0306624X18778449. Epub 2018 Jun 8.
4
Sex Offender Risk Assessment: Where Are We and Where Are We Going?性犯罪者风险评估:我们现在在哪里,我们要去哪里?
Curr Psychiatry Rep. 2018 May 19;20(6):46. doi: 10.1007/s11920-018-0909-8.
5
Relationships Between Treatment Delivery, Program Attrition, and Reoffending Outcomes in an Intensive Custodial Sex Offender Program.在密集型监禁性罪犯计划中,治疗提供、项目流失与再犯罪结果之间的关系。
Sex Abuse. 2019 Jun;31(4):477-499. doi: 10.1177/1079063218764886. Epub 2018 Mar 22.
6
You Do What? A Qualitative Investigation Into the Motivation to Volunteer With Circles of Support and Accountability.你做什么?对参与支持与责任圈志愿服务动机的定性调查。
Sex Abuse. 2019 Mar;31(2):237-260. doi: 10.1177/1079063217729157. Epub 2017 Sep 9.
7
Volunteering With Sex Offenders: The Attitudes of Volunteers Toward Sex Offenders, Their Treatment, and Rehabilitation.与性犯罪者一起做志愿者:志愿者对性犯罪者及其治疗与康复的态度。
Sex Abuse. 2018 Sep;30(6):659-675. doi: 10.1177/1079063217691964. Epub 2017 Feb 9.
8
Implicit Theories and Offender Representativeness in Judgments About Sexual Crime.性犯罪判决中的内隐理论与犯罪者代表性
Sex Abuse. 2018 Apr;30(3):276-295. doi: 10.1177/1079063216658019. Epub 2016 Jul 1.
9
Construct Validity of the Violence Risk Scale-Sexual Offender Version Instrument in a Multisite Sample of Treated Sexual Offenders.多地点治疗性犯罪者样本中暴力风险量表-性犯罪者版本工具的建构效度。
Assessment. 2018 Jan;25(1):40-55. doi: 10.1177/1073191116643819. Epub 2016 Apr 15.
10
"I Am a Different Man Now"-Sex Offenders in Circles of Support and Accountability: A Prospective Study.“我已焕然一新”——性犯罪者在支持与问责圈子中的情况:一项前瞻性研究
Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol. 2017 May;61(7):751-772. doi: 10.1177/0306624X15612431. Epub 2015 Oct 28.