Dinc B, Aycan I O, Ozdemir S, Dandin O, Hadimioglu N, Mercan T, Yamasan B E, Kisaoglu A
Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Akdeniz University Medical Faculty, Antalya, Turkey.
Department of Biophysics, Akdeniz University Medical Faculty, Antalya, Turkey.
Hippokratia. 2021 Jan-Mar;25(1):22-30.
The purpose of the retrospective study was to identify the impacts of different solutions on the electrocardiogram and cardiovascular changes. Moreover, the differences between these solutions were analyzed by examining their impacts on rat ventricular cardiomyocytes.
Eighty renal transplant patients were evaluated retrospectively. The patients were divided into two groups: Group UW (n =40) used the University of Wisconsin solution, and Group HTK (n =40) used the Histidine-Tryptophan-Ketoglutarate solution. Electrocardiograms of the subjects were obtained three times at different periods; during the pre-perfusion, intraoperative kidney reperfusion, and postperfusion phase at the end of the surgery. Any Electrocardiogram or cardiovascular alterations were noted and analyzed. Adult male Wistar rats were used for experiments. Myocyte contractility, action potentials, and membrane current were recorded in enzymatically isolated ventricular myocytes.
Sinus bradycardia was detected in 19 patients of Group UW, while there was short-term asystole in eight patients. However, no cardiac changes were observed in Group HTK patients. In both Groups, reperfusion and postperfusion corrected QT (QTc) intervals were different from pre-perfusion QTc intervals. Group UW patients' reperfusion and postperfusion QTc's values were higher than those of the Group HTK patients. In rat myocytes, prominent asystole episodes were observed at specific concentrations of the UW solution compared to the HTK solution. The UW solution depolarized the resting membrane potential significantly and decreased the peak value of action potential, whereas the HTK solution did not elicit a significant change in those parameters. Accordingly, the UW solution elicited a significant inward current at -70 mV, while the HTK solution activated only a modest current, which may not change the membrane potential.
Prolongation of QTc intervals was detected with reperfusion in both groups according to electrocardiography analysis. However, the QTc interval was observed to be longer in cases using the UW solution and required intervention intraoperatively. HIPPOKRATIA 2021, 25 (1):22-30.
这项回顾性研究的目的是确定不同溶液对心电图和心血管变化的影响。此外,通过研究这些溶液对大鼠心室心肌细胞的影响来分析它们之间的差异。
对80例肾移植患者进行回顾性评估。患者分为两组:UW组(n = 40)使用威斯康星大学溶液,HTK组(n = 40)使用组氨酸-色氨酸-酮戊二酸溶液。在不同时期对受试者进行三次心电图检查;在灌注前、术中肾脏再灌注以及手术结束时的灌注后阶段。记录并分析任何心电图或心血管改变。使用成年雄性Wistar大鼠进行实验。在酶分离的心室肌细胞中记录心肌收缩力、动作电位和膜电流。
UW组19例患者检测到窦性心动过缓,8例患者出现短期心脏停搏。然而,HTK组患者未观察到心脏变化。两组中,再灌注和灌注后校正QT(QTc)间期均与灌注前QTc间期不同。UW组患者再灌注和灌注后QTc值高于HTK组患者。在大鼠心肌细胞中,与HTK溶液相比,在UW溶液的特定浓度下观察到明显的心脏停搏发作。UW溶液使静息膜电位显著去极化并降低动作电位峰值,而HTK溶液在这些参数上未引起显著变化。因此,UW溶液在-70 mV时引发显著内向电流,而HTK溶液仅激活适度电流,可能不会改变膜电位。
根据心电图分析,两组再灌注时均检测到QTc间期延长。然而,使用UW溶液的病例中QTc间期更长,术中需要干预。希波克拉底2021年,25(1):22 - 30。