• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

《强制护理法》:对住院或门诊非自愿治疗的早期观察与期望

The Compulsory Care Act: Early Observations and Expectations of In- or Outpatient Involuntary Treatment.

作者信息

Gemsa Stephan, Noorthoorn Eric O, Lepping Peter, de Haan Hein A, Wierdsma Andre I, Hutschemaekers Giel J M

机构信息

Ggnet Mental Health Institute, Child Psychiatry Service, Warnsveld, Netherlands.

Betsi Cadwaladr University Health Board, Wrexham, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Front Psychiatry. 2022 Feb 8;12:770934. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.770934. eCollection 2021.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyt.2021.770934
PMID:35222103
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8864544/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

On January 1, 2020, the Dutch Compulsory Care Act (WvGGZ) replaced the Special Admissions Act (BOPZ). While the old law only allowed compulsory treatment in hospitals, the new law allows it both inside and outside the hospital. Moreover, the new law prioritizes the patient's own opinion on coercive measures. By following patients' own choices, the Compulsory Care Act is hoped to lead to fewer admission days and less inpatient compulsory treatment in involuntarily admitted patients.

METHODS

We studied the seclusion and enforced-medication events before and after January 1, 2020, using coercive measures monitoring data in a Mental Health Trust. Trends in hours of seclusion and the number of enforced-medication events per month from 2012 to 2019 were compared with 2020. We used generalized linear models to perform time series analysis. Logistic regression analyses and generalized linear models were performed to investigate whether patient compilation determined some of the observed changes in seclusion use or enforced-medication events.

RESULTS

The mean number of hours of seclusion between 2012 and 2019 was 27,124 per year, decreasing from 48,542 in 2012 to 21,133 in 2019 to 3,844 h in 2020. The mean incidence of enforced-medication events between 2012 and 2019 was 167, increasing from 90 in 2012 to 361 in 2019 and then fell to 294 in 2020. In 2020, we observed 3,844 h of seclusion and 294 enforced-medication events. Near to no outpatient coercion was reported, even though it was warranted. The time series analysis showed a significant effect of the year 2020 on seclusion hours (β = -1.867; Exp(β) = 0.155, Wald = 27.22, p = 0.001), but not on enforced-medication events [β = 0.48; Exp(β) = 1.616, Wald = 2.33, = 0.13].

DISCUSSION

There was a reduction in the number of seclusion hours after the introduction of the Compulsory Care Act. The number of enforced-medication events also increased from a very low baseline, but from 2017 onwards. To see whether these findings are consistent over time, they need to be replicated in the near future.

CONCLUSION

We observed a significant increase in enforced-medication use and a decrease in seclusion hours. The year 2020 predicted seclusion hours, but not enforced-medication events.

摘要

背景

2020年1月1日,荷兰《强制护理法》(WvGGZ)取代了《特殊收治法》(BOPZ)。旧法仅允许在医院进行强制治疗,而新法允许在医院内外进行强制治疗。此外,新法优先考虑患者对强制措施的个人意见。通过遵循患者自己的选择,希望《强制护理法》能减少非自愿收治患者的住院天数和住院强制治疗次数。

方法

我们利用一家心理健康信托机构的强制措施监测数据,研究了2020年1月1日前后的隔离和强制用药事件。将2012年至2019年每月的隔离时长趋势和强制用药事件数量与2020年进行比较。我们使用广义线性模型进行时间序列分析。进行逻辑回归分析和广义线性模型分析,以调查患者配合情况是否决定了观察到的隔离使用或强制用药事件的某些变化。

结果

2012年至2019年期间,每年的平均隔离时长为27124小时,从2012年的48542小时降至2019年的21133小时,再到2020年的3844小时。2012年至2019年期间,强制用药事件的平均发生率为167起,从2012年的90起增至2019年的361起,然后在2020年降至294起。2020年,我们观察到3844小时的隔离和294起强制用药事件。几乎没有报告门诊强制情况,尽管有必要进行门诊强制。时间序列分析显示,2020年对隔离时长有显著影响(β = -1.867;Exp(β) = 0.155,Wald = 27.22,p = 0.001),但对强制用药事件没有显著影响[β = 0.48;Exp(β) = 1.616,Wald = 2.33,p = 0.13]。

讨论

《强制护理法》实施后,隔离时长有所减少。强制用药事件数量也从非常低的基线开始增加,但从2017年起开始增加。为了确定这些发现是否随时间一致,需要在不久的将来进行重复验证。

结论

我们观察到强制用药的使用显著增加,隔离时长减少。2020年可预测隔离时长,但不能预测强制用药事件。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e0cc/8864544/f4563515a8fe/fpsyt-12-770934-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e0cc/8864544/e0d707477168/fpsyt-12-770934-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e0cc/8864544/f4563515a8fe/fpsyt-12-770934-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e0cc/8864544/e0d707477168/fpsyt-12-770934-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e0cc/8864544/f4563515a8fe/fpsyt-12-770934-g0002.jpg

相似文献

1
The Compulsory Care Act: Early Observations and Expectations of In- or Outpatient Involuntary Treatment.《强制护理法》:对住院或门诊非自愿治疗的早期观察与期望
Front Psychiatry. 2022 Feb 8;12:770934. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.770934. eCollection 2021.
2
Seclusion and enforced medication in dealing with aggression: A prospective dynamic cohort study.隔离与强制用药应对攻击行为:一项前瞻性动态队列研究。
Eur Psychiatry. 2017 Jan;39:86-92. doi: 10.1016/j.eurpsy.2016.08.002. Epub 2016 Dec 16.
3
The use of coercive interventions in mental health care in Germany and the Netherlands. A comparison of the developments in two neighboring countries.德国和荷兰精神卫生保健中强制性干预的使用。两个邻国发展的比较。
Front Public Health. 2014 Sep 24;2:141. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2014.00141. eCollection 2014.
4
Freedom Restrictive Coercive Measures in Forensic Psychiatry.法医精神病学中的自由限制与强制手段
Front Psychiatry. 2020 Mar 5;11:146. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2020.00146. eCollection 2020.
5
[Involuntary medication as the intervention of choice: can this be regarded as 'substitution' or as a preventive measure? a prospective cohort study].[将非自愿用药作为首选干预措施:这可被视为“替代”还是预防措施?一项前瞻性队列研究]
Tijdschr Psychiatr. 2014;56(10):640-8.
6
Long-Term Impact of a Tailored Seclusion Reduction Program: Evidence for Change?个体化隔离减少计划的长期影响:有变化的证据吗?
Psychiatr Q. 2018 Sep;89(3):733-746. doi: 10.1007/s11126-018-9571-x.
7
Involuntary Medication, Seclusion, and Restraint in German Psychiatric Hospitals after the Adoption of Legislation in 2013.2013年立法通过后德国精神病医院的非自愿用药、隔离和约束措施
Front Psychiatry. 2015 Oct 28;6:153. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2015.00153. eCollection 2015.
8
A cross-sectional prospective study of seclusion, restraint and involuntary medication in acute psychiatric wards: patient, staff and ward characteristics.横断面前瞻性研究:精神科急性病房的隔离、约束和非自愿药物治疗:患者、工作人员和病房特点。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2010 Apr 6;10:89. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-10-89.
9
Effect of coercive measures on treatment outcome in involuntarily admitted patients in Amsterdam.强制措施对阿姆斯特丹非自愿入院患者治疗结果的影响。
Front Psychiatry. 2023 Sep 22;14:1240129. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1240129. eCollection 2023.
10
Reduction of seclusion on a hospital-wide level: successful implementation of a less restrictive policy.在全院范围内减少隔离措施:成功实施一项限制较少的政策。
J Psychiatr Res. 2014 Jul;54:94-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2014.03.020. Epub 2014 Apr 1.

本文引用的文献

1
Impact of the first COVID-19 outbreak on mental health service utilisation at a Dutch mental health centre: retrospective observational study.荷兰一家心理健康中心首次新冠疫情爆发对心理健康服务利用情况的影响:回顾性观察研究
BJPsych Open. 2021 Nov 17;7(6):e213. doi: 10.1192/bjo.2021.1049.
2
Coercive interventions under the new Dutch mental health law: Towards a CRPD-compliant law?荷兰新心理健康法下的强制性干预措施:能否成为一部符合《残疾人权利公约》的法律?
Int J Law Psychiatry. 2021 May-Jun;76:101685. doi: 10.1016/j.ijlp.2021.101685. Epub 2021 Mar 15.
3
Does high and intensive care reduce coercion? Association of HIC model fidelity to seclusion use in the Netherlands.
高密集监护能否减少强制?荷兰 HIC 模型忠实度对隔离使用的影响。
BMC Psychiatry. 2020 Sep 29;20(1):469. doi: 10.1186/s12888-020-02855-y.
4
Three Pathways of Seclusion Reduction Programs to Sustainability: Ten Years Follow Up in Psychiatry.减少隔离计划的三种途径可持续性:精神病学十年随访。
Psychiatr Q. 2020 Sep;91(3):819-834. doi: 10.1007/s11126-020-09738-1.
5
Influence of nursing staff attitudes and characteristics on the use of coercive measures in acute mental health services-A systematic review.护理人员态度和特征对急性精神卫生服务中强制手段使用的影响——一项系统综述
J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2020 Aug;27(4):446-459. doi: 10.1111/jpm.12586. Epub 2020 Jan 14.
6
High and Intensive Care in Psychiatry: Validating the HIC Monitor as a Tool for Assessing the Quality of Psychiatric Intensive Care Units.精神科的高度和强化护理:验证 HIC 监测器作为评估精神科强化护理单元质量的工具。
Adm Policy Ment Health. 2019 Jan;46(1):34-43. doi: 10.1007/s10488-018-0890-x.
7
Long-Term Impact of a Tailored Seclusion Reduction Program: Evidence for Change?个体化隔离减少计划的长期影响:有变化的证据吗?
Psychiatr Q. 2018 Sep;89(3):733-746. doi: 10.1007/s11126-018-9571-x.
8
Seclusion and enforced medication in dealing with aggression: A prospective dynamic cohort study.隔离与强制用药应对攻击行为:一项前瞻性动态队列研究。
Eur Psychiatry. 2017 Jan;39:86-92. doi: 10.1016/j.eurpsy.2016.08.002. Epub 2016 Dec 16.
9
'It's unbelievably humiliating'-Patients' expressions of negative effects of coercion in mental health care.“这简直令人难以置信地丢脸”——患者对精神卫生保健中强制手段负面影响的表述。
Int J Law Psychiatry. 2016 Sep-Dec;49(Pt A):147-153. doi: 10.1016/j.ijlp.2016.08.009. Epub 2016 Oct 7.
10
Logistic Regression: Relating Patient Characteristics to Outcomes.逻辑回归:将患者特征与预后相关联。
JAMA. 2016 Aug 2;316(5):533-4. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.7653.