• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

个体化隔离减少计划的长期影响:有变化的证据吗?

Long-Term Impact of a Tailored Seclusion Reduction Program: Evidence for Change?

机构信息

Pro Persona Mental Health Care, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.

Pro Persona Mental Health Care, Wolfheze, the Netherlands.

出版信息

Psychiatr Q. 2018 Sep;89(3):733-746. doi: 10.1007/s11126-018-9571-x.

DOI:10.1007/s11126-018-9571-x
PMID:29527618
Abstract

International comparative studies show that Dutch seclusion rates are relatively high. Therefore, several programs to change this practice were developed and implemented. The purpose of this study was to examine the impact of a seclusion reduction program over a long time frame, from 2004 until 2013. Three phases could be identified; the phase of development and implementation of the program (2004-2007), the project phase (2008-2010) and the consolidation phase (2011-2013). Five inpatient wards of a mental health institute were monitored. Each ward had one or more seclusion rooms. Primary outcome were the number and the duration of seclusion incidents. Involuntary medication was monitored as well to rule out substitution of one coercive measure by another. Case mix correction for patient characteristics was done by a multi-level logistic regression analysis with patient characteristics as predictors and hours seclusion per admission hours as outcome. Seclusion use reduced significantly during the project phase, both in number (-73%) and duration (-80%) and was not substituted by the use of enforced medication. Patient compilation as analyzed by the multi- level regression seemed not to confound the findings. Findings show a slight increase in number and seclusion days over the last year of monitoring. Whether this should be interpreted as a continuous or temporary trend remains unclear and is subject for further investigation.

摘要

国际比较研究表明,荷兰的禁闭率相对较高。因此,开发并实施了几个改变这一做法的项目。本研究的目的是在较长时间内(2004 年至 2013 年)考察减少禁闭项目的影响。可以确定三个阶段;项目的开发和实施阶段(2004-2007 年)、项目阶段(2008-2010 年)和巩固阶段(2011-2013 年)。一家心理健康机构的五间住院病房进行了监测。每个病房都有一个或多个禁闭室。主要结果是禁闭事件的数量和持续时间。为了排除一种强制措施被另一种强制措施取代的情况,还监测了非自愿用药情况。通过多水平逻辑回归分析,以患者特征为预测因子,以每入院小时的禁闭时间为结果,对患者特征进行了病例组合校正。在项目阶段,禁闭的使用数量(减少了 73%)和持续时间(减少了 80%)都显著减少,而且没有被强制用药所取代。通过多水平回归分析的患者编译似乎并没有混淆研究结果。研究结果显示,在监测的最后一年,禁闭的数量和天数略有增加。这是否应该被解释为连续的还是暂时的趋势仍不清楚,需要进一步调查。

相似文献

1
Long-Term Impact of a Tailored Seclusion Reduction Program: Evidence for Change?个体化隔离减少计划的长期影响:有变化的证据吗?
Psychiatr Q. 2018 Sep;89(3):733-746. doi: 10.1007/s11126-018-9571-x.
2
Reduction of seclusion on a hospital-wide level: successful implementation of a less restrictive policy.在全院范围内减少隔离措施:成功实施一项限制较少的政策。
J Psychiatr Res. 2014 Jul;54:94-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2014.03.020. Epub 2014 Apr 1.
3
Differences in seclusion rates between admission wards: does patient compilation explain?不同入院病房的隔离率差异:患者构成能解释吗?
Psychiatr Q. 2013 Mar;84(1):39-52. doi: 10.1007/s11126-012-9225-3.
4
[Seclusion: a medical and political problem].[隔离:一个医学与政治问题]
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2009;153:A962.
5
Methodological issues in monitoring the use of coercive measures.监测强制性措施使用情况的方法学问题。
Int J Law Psychiatry. 2011 Nov-Dec;34(6):429-38. doi: 10.1016/j.ijlp.2011.10.008. Epub 2011 Nov 12.
6
One-year incidence and prevalence of seclusion: Dutch findings in an international perspective.隔离的一年发病率和患病率:荷兰研究结果的国际视角
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2015 Dec;50(12):1857-69. doi: 10.1007/s00127-015-1094-2. Epub 2015 Jul 19.
7
Factors associated with use of psychiatric intensive care and seclusion in adult inpatient mental health services.与成人住院精神卫生服务中心使用精神科强化护理和隔离相关的因素。
Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci. 2018 Feb;27(1):51-61. doi: 10.1017/S2045796016000731. Epub 2016 Oct 20.
8
Seclusion and enforced medication in dealing with aggression: A prospective dynamic cohort study.隔离与强制用药应对攻击行为:一项前瞻性动态队列研究。
Eur Psychiatry. 2017 Jan;39:86-92. doi: 10.1016/j.eurpsy.2016.08.002. Epub 2016 Dec 16.
9
Impact of the physical environment of psychiatric wards on the use of seclusion.精神科病房物理环境对隔离使用的影响。
Br J Psychiatry. 2013 Feb;202:142-9. doi: 10.1192/bjp.bp.112.118422. Epub 2013 Jan 10.
10
[Involuntary medication as the intervention of choice: can this be regarded as 'substitution' or as a preventive measure? a prospective cohort study].[将非自愿用药作为首选干预措施:这可被视为“替代”还是预防措施?一项前瞻性队列研究]
Tijdschr Psychiatr. 2014;56(10):640-8.

引用本文的文献

1
[Coercion in psychiatric hospitalizations in Chile: madness and suffering in the 21st century].[智利精神病住院治疗中的强制手段:21世纪的疯狂与苦难]
Salud Colect. 2023 Jul 27;19:e4349. doi: 10.18294/sc.2023.4349.
2
The Compulsory Care Act: Early Observations and Expectations of In- or Outpatient Involuntary Treatment.《强制护理法》:对住院或门诊非自愿治疗的早期观察与期望
Front Psychiatry. 2022 Feb 8;12:770934. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.770934. eCollection 2021.
3
The Forensic High and Intensive Care Monitor: Measurement Properties of a Model Fidelity Scale for Contact-Based Care in Forensic Psychiatry.

本文引用的文献

1
Factors associated with use of psychiatric intensive care and seclusion in adult inpatient mental health services.与成人住院精神卫生服务中心使用精神科强化护理和隔离相关的因素。
Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci. 2018 Feb;27(1):51-61. doi: 10.1017/S2045796016000731. Epub 2016 Oct 20.
2
Seclusion Reduction in Dutch Mental Health Care: Did Hospitals Meet Goals?荷兰精神卫生保健中隔离措施的减少:医院是否达成目标?
Psychiatr Serv. 2016 Dec 1;67(12):1321-1327. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.201500414. Epub 2016 Jul 1.
3
One-year incidence and prevalence of seclusion: Dutch findings in an international perspective.
法医高级和强化监护仪:基于接触的法医精神病学护理模型保真度量表的测量特性。
Adm Policy Ment Health. 2022 Jul;49(4):587-595. doi: 10.1007/s10488-021-01185-9. Epub 2022 Feb 16.
4
Does high and intensive care reduce coercion? Association of HIC model fidelity to seclusion use in the Netherlands.高密集监护能否减少强制?荷兰 HIC 模型忠实度对隔离使用的影响。
BMC Psychiatry. 2020 Sep 29;20(1):469. doi: 10.1186/s12888-020-02855-y.
5
Preventing and reducing 'coercion' in mental health services: an international scoping review of English-language studies.预防和减少精神卫生服务中的“强制”现象:一项针对英文文献的国际范围综述。
Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2020 Jul;142(1):27-39. doi: 10.1111/acps.13152. Epub 2020 Feb 9.
6
Measures to Avoid Coercion in Psychiatry and Their Efficacy.避免精神病学中强制手段的措施及其效果。
Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2019 May 10;116(19):336-343. doi: 10.3238/arztebl.2019.0336.
7
Text Analysis of Electronic Medical Records to Predict Seclusion in Psychiatric Wards: Proof of Concept.用于预测精神科病房隔离情况的电子病历文本分析:概念验证
Front Psychiatry. 2019 Apr 11;10:188. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2019.00188. eCollection 2019.
隔离的一年发病率和患病率:荷兰研究结果的国际视角
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2015 Dec;50(12):1857-69. doi: 10.1007/s00127-015-1094-2. Epub 2015 Jul 19.
4
Seclusion as a necessary vs. an appropriate intervention: a vignette study among mental health nurses.隔离作为一种必要的与适当的干预措施:一项针对精神科护士的案例研究
J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2015 May;22(4):226-33. doi: 10.1111/jpm.12176.
5
Seclusion and the importance of contextual factors: An innovation project revisited.隔离与情境因素的重要性:对一个创新项目的重新审视
Int J Law Psychiatry. 2015 Jul-Aug;41:1-11. doi: 10.1016/j.ijlp.2015.03.001. Epub 2015 Apr 4.
6
Multinational experiences in reducing and preventing the use of restraint and seclusion.减少和预防使用约束与隔离措施的跨国经验。
J Psychosoc Nurs Ment Health Serv. 2014 Nov;52(11):22-9. doi: 10.3928/02793695-20140915-01. Epub 2014 Oct 15.
7
The use of coercive interventions in mental health care in Germany and the Netherlands. A comparison of the developments in two neighboring countries.德国和荷兰精神卫生保健中强制性干预的使用。两个邻国发展的比较。
Front Public Health. 2014 Sep 24;2:141. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2014.00141. eCollection 2014.
8
Multisite study of an evidence-based practice to reduce seclusion and restraint in psychiatric inpatient facilities.一项关于减少精神科住院设施中隔离和约束措施的循证实践的多中心研究。
Psychiatr Serv. 2014 Mar 1;65(3):345-51. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.201300210.
9
Reduction in the use of seclusion by the methodical work approach.通过系统工作方法减少隔离的使用。
Int J Ment Health Nurs. 2014 Apr;23(2):161-70. doi: 10.1111/inm.12037. Epub 2013 Jul 29.
10
Impact of the physical environment of psychiatric wards on the use of seclusion.精神科病房物理环境对隔离使用的影响。
Br J Psychiatry. 2013 Feb;202:142-9. doi: 10.1192/bjp.bp.112.118422. Epub 2013 Jan 10.