Li Hui-Xian, Hu Xiaomeng
CAS Key Laboratory of Behavioral Science, Institute of Psychology, Beijing, China.
Department of Psychology, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.
Front Psychol. 2022 Feb 10;13:760489. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.760489. eCollection 2022.
Our current work examined the interface between thinking style and emotional experience at both the behavioral and neuropsychological levels. Thirty-nine Chinese participants completed the triad task, and we calculated the rate of individually selected relationship pairings to overall selections to represent their holistic thinking tendencies. In addition, participants in the top one-third of the ratio score were classified into the high holistic thinking group, while those in the bottom one-third of the ratio score were classified into the low holistic thinking group. We used the sensitivity to punishment and sensitivity to reward questionnaire (SPSRQ) to examine how people elicit positive and negative affective behaviors. Additionally, we examined the volume of the amygdala and nucleus accumbens and their functional connectivity in the resting-state. We found that high holistic thinkers were much less sensitive to rewards than low holistic thinkers. In other words, individuals with high holistic thinking are less likely to pursue behaviors that have positive emotional outcomes. Furthermore, their bilateral nucleus accumbens and right amygdala volumes were smaller than those of low holistic thinkers. Hierarchical regression analysis showed that holistic thinking tendency can negatively predict the volume of the left nucleus accumbens and right amygdala. Finally, resting-state functional connectivity results showed increased functional connectivity FC between left nucleus accumbens and bilateral amygdala in high holistic thinkers. These findings provide emotion-related manifestations of thinking styles at the behavioral and neural levels.
我们目前的研究在行为和神经心理学层面考察了思维方式与情感体验之间的关联。39名中国参与者完成了三元组任务,我们计算个体选择的关系配对占总体选择的比例,以代表他们的整体思维倾向。此外,比例得分处于前三分一的参与者被归为高整体思维组,而比例得分处于后三分一的参与者被归为低整体思维组。我们使用惩罚敏感性和奖励敏感性问卷(SPSRQ)来考察人们如何引发积极和消极的情感行为。此外,我们还检测了杏仁核和伏隔核的体积以及它们在静息状态下的功能连接。我们发现,高整体思维者对奖励的敏感度远低于低整体思维者。换句话说,具有高整体思维的个体不太可能去追求具有积极情感结果的行为。此外,他们双侧伏隔核和右侧杏仁核的体积比低整体思维者小。层次回归分析表明,整体思维倾向能够负向预测左侧伏隔核和右侧杏仁核的体积。最后,静息状态功能连接结果显示,高整体思维者左侧伏隔核与双侧杏仁核之间的功能连接(FC)增强。这些发现揭示了思维方式在行为和神经层面与情感相关的表现。