Suppr超能文献

I组中的内源性CRISPR-Cas系统并不直接靶向肉毒杆菌神经毒素基因簇。

Endogenous CRISPR-Cas Systems in Group I and Do Not Directly Target the Botulinum Neurotoxin Gene Cluster.

作者信息

Wentz Travis G, Tremblay Benjamin J M, Bradshaw Marite, Doxey Andrew C, Sharma Shashi K, Sauer John-Demian, Pellett Sabine

机构信息

Microbiology Doctoral Training Program, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, United States.

Division of Microbiology, Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition, Food and Drug Administration, College Park, MD, United States.

出版信息

Front Microbiol. 2022 Feb 9;12:787726. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2021.787726. eCollection 2021.

Abstract

Most strains of proteolytic group I (G1 ) and some strains of possess genes encoding botulinum neurotoxin (BoNT), a potent neuroparalytic agent. Within G1 , conserved gene clusters of three major toxin serotypes (/A/B/F) can be found on conjugative plasmids and/or within chromosomal pathogenicity islands. CRISPR-Cas systems enable site-specific targeting of previously encountered mobile genetic elements (MGE) such as plasmids and bacteriophage through the creation of a spacer library complementary to protospacers within the MGEs. To examine whether endogenous CRISPR-Cas systems restrict the transfer of gene clusters across strains we conducted a bioinformatic analysis profiling endogenous CRISPR-Cas systems from 241 G1 and strains. Approximately 6,200 CRISPR spacers were identified across the strains and Type I-B, III-A/B/D genes and CRISPR array features were identified in 83% of the strains. Mapping the predicted spacers against the masked strain and RefSeq plasmid dataset identified 56,000 spacer-protospacer matches. While spacers mapped heavily to targets within (+) plasmids, no protospacers were identified within the gene clusters. These results indicate the toxin is not a direct target of CRISPR-Cas but the plasmids predominantly responsible for its mobilization are. Finally, while the presence of a CRISPR-Cas system did not reliably indicate the presence or absence of a gene cluster, comparative genomics across strains indicates they often occupy the same hypervariable loci common to both species, potentially suggesting similar mechanisms are involved in the acquisition and curation of both genomic features.

摘要

大多数蛋白水解性I组(G1)菌株以及某些菌株拥有编码肉毒杆菌神经毒素(BoNT)的基因,BoNT是一种强效神经麻痹剂。在G1组内,可在接合质粒和/或染色体致病岛内发现三种主要毒素血清型(/A/B/F)的保守基因簇。CRISPR-Cas系统通过创建与移动遗传元件(MGE)内原间隔序列互补的间隔序列文库,实现对先前遇到的MGE(如质粒和噬菌体)进行位点特异性靶向。为了研究内源性CRISPR-Cas系统是否会限制基因簇在菌株间的转移,我们进行了一项生物信息学分析,对来自241株G1和菌株的内源性CRISPR-Cas系统进行了分析。在这些菌株中鉴定出了约6200个CRISPR间隔序列,并且在83%的菌株中鉴定出了I-B型、III-A/B/D型基因和CRISPR阵列特征。将预测的间隔序列与经过掩码处理的菌株和RefSeq质粒数据集进行比对,鉴定出了56000个间隔序列-原间隔序列匹配。虽然间隔序列大量比对到(+)质粒内的靶点,但在基因簇内未鉴定出原间隔序列。这些结果表明毒素不是CRISPR-Cas的直接靶点,而主要负责其移动的质粒是。最后,虽然CRISPR-Cas系统的存在并不能可靠地表明基因簇的存在与否,但跨菌株的比较基因组学表明它们通常占据两个物种共有的相同高变位点,这可能表明在这两种基因组特征的获取和管理过程中涉及相似的机制。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/42dd/8865420/93feee1ef0c2/fmicb-12-787726-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验