St-Germain M-W, Veillette M, Létourneau V, Martínez A D Larios, Godbout S, Boulianne M, Duchaine C
Département de biochimie, de microbiologie et de bio-informatique, Faculté des sciences et de génie, Université Laval, Québec, Canada.
Centre de recherche de l'Institut universitaire de cardiologie et de pneumologie de Québec, Québec, Canada.
Poult Sci. 2025 Apr 29;104(8):105217. doi: 10.1016/j.psj.2025.105217.
Canada's transition toward alternative housing systems for laying hens may have an impact on bioaerosol content and concentrations in those environments. This project aimed to characterize the airborne bacterial diversity in six conventional hen houses, six enriched colonies and six aviaries. The bacterial diversity found in bioaerosols was also compared to the diversity found in feces or litter samples from each corresponding housing type to investigate similarities between possible bioaerosol sources and bioaerosols.
Specific richness (S) and CHAO1 indexes were higher in air samples from conventional hen houses and enriched colonies, compared to their corresponding fecal or litter samples, which was not the case for aviaries samples. No significant differences were found between the Shannon and inverse Simpson (InvSimpson) indexes of air samples, compared to their corresponding fecal or litter samples. Firmicutes were the dominant phyla in all samples, followed by Actinobacteria. Dominant genera were Lactobacillus, unclassified Lanchnospiraceae, unclassified Actinomycetales, unclassified Clostridales and unclassified Ruminococcaceae. OTUs (Operational Taxonomic Units) were associated with hen microbiota and gut microbiota, and soil. Homogeneity of molecular variance analyses (HOMOVA) revealed significant differences between air samples from aviaries, compared to air samples from conventional and enriched cage houses. Significant differences were found between air and fecal or litter samples from conventional hen houses and enriched colonies, but not among aviary samples.
Findings highlight the effects of housing types on airborne bacterial diversity, and similarities in bacterial diversity between air and fecal or litter samples from three types of husbandry. Most dominant OTUs were shared across all samples, but were different in proportions, which may account for the differences in alpha and beta diversities. The overlap in bacterial diversities between air and litter samples collected in aviaries brings out the contribution of litter to ambient bioaerosols.
加拿大向蛋鸡替代饲养系统的转变可能会对这些环境中的生物气溶胶含量和浓度产生影响。本项目旨在描述六个传统鸡舍、六个富集鸡群和六个鸟舍中的空气传播细菌多样性。还将生物气溶胶中的细菌多样性与每种相应饲养类型的粪便或垫料样本中的多样性进行比较,以研究可能的生物气溶胶来源与生物气溶胶之间的相似性。
与相应的粪便或垫料样本相比,传统鸡舍和富集鸡群空气样本中的特定丰富度(S)和CHAO1指数更高,鸟舍样本则不然。与相应的粪便或垫料样本相比,空气样本的香农指数和反辛普森(InvSimpson)指数没有显著差异。厚壁菌门是所有样本中的优势菌门,其次是放线菌门。优势属为乳酸杆菌属、未分类的毛螺菌科、未分类的放线菌目、未分类的梭菌目和未分类的瘤胃球菌科。操作分类单元(OTU)与母鸡微生物群和肠道微生物群以及土壤有关。分子方差同质性分析(HOMOVA)显示,与传统鸡舍和富集鸡笼舍的空气样本相比,鸟舍空气样本之间存在显著差异。传统鸡舍和富集鸡群的空气与粪便或垫料样本之间存在显著差异,但鸟舍样本之间没有。
研究结果突出了饲养类型对空气传播细菌多样性的影响,以及三种饲养方式的空气与粪便或垫料样本之间细菌多样性的相似性。大多数优势OTU在所有样本中都有,但比例不同,这可能解释了α和β多样性的差异。鸟舍中收集的空气和垫料样本之间细菌多样性的重叠揭示了垫料对环境生物气溶胶的贡献。