Suppr超能文献

使用微型电极测量进行最大电压引导消融治疗典型心房扑动:一项随机对照试验。

Ablation of typical atrial flutter using mini electrode measurements for maximum voltage-guided ablation: A randomized, controlled trial.

作者信息

Rowe Matthew K, Claughton Andrew, Davis Jason, Yee Lauren, Kaye Gerald C, Dauber Kieran, Hill John, Gould Paul A

机构信息

Department of Cardiology Princess Alexandra Hospital Brisbane Queensland Australia.

The University of Queensland Brisbane Queensland Australia.

出版信息

J Arrhythm. 2021 Dec 9;38(1):106-114. doi: 10.1002/joa3.12665. eCollection 2022 Feb.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Novel ablation catheters with mini electrode (ME) sensing have become available but their utility is unclear. We investigated whether ablation of the cavotricuspid isthmus (CTI) for atrial flutter (AFL) would be improved using ME signals.

METHODS

Sixty-one patients (76% male, 63 ± 10 years) with CTI-dependent AFL underwent ablation using a maximum voltage-guided approach, randomized to either standard 8 mm non-irrigated catheter with bipolar signals or IntellaTip MiFi catheter using ME signals alone.

RESULTS

Acute bidirectional block was achieved in 97%. Mean follow-up was 16.7 ± 10 months. The median number of ablation lesions was 13 in both groups (range 3-62 vs. 1-43,  = .85). No significant differences were observed in AFL recurrences (17% vs. 11%,  = .7), median procedure durations (97 min [interquartile range (IQR), 71-121] vs. 87 min [IQR, 72-107],  = .55) or fluoroscopy times (31 min [IQR, 21-52] vs. 38 min [IQR, 25-70],  = .56). Amplitudes of ME signals were on average 160% greater than blinded bipolar signals. In 23.7% of lesions where bipolar signals were difficult to interpret, 13.6% showed a clear ME signal.

CONCLUSIONS

There was no difference in the effectiveness of CTI ablation guided by ME signals, compared with using bipolar signals from a standard 8 mm ablation catheter. While ME signal amplitudes were larger and sometimes present when the bipolar signal was unclear, this did not improve procedural characteristics or outcomes. The results suggest future research should focus on lesion integrity rather than signal sensing.

摘要

背景

带有微型电极(ME)传感功能的新型消融导管已可使用,但其效用尚不清楚。我们研究了使用ME信号进行三尖瓣峡部(CTI)消融治疗心房扑动(AFL)是否会有所改善。

方法

61例依赖CTI的AFL患者(76%为男性,63±10岁)接受了最大电压引导下的消融治疗,随机分为使用双极信号的标准8mm非灌注导管组或仅使用ME信号的IntellaTip MiFi导管组。

结果

97%实现了急性双向阻滞。平均随访时间为16.7±10个月。两组的消融灶中位数均为13个(范围3 - 62个对1 - 43个,P = 0.85)。在AFL复发率(17%对11%,P = 0.7)、手术持续时间中位数(97分钟[四分位间距(IQR),71 - 121]对87分钟[IQR,72 - 107],P = 0.55)或透视时间(31分钟[IQR,21 - 52]对38分钟[IQR,25 - 70],P = 0.56)方面未观察到显著差异。ME信号的幅度平均比盲法双极信号大160%。在23.7%双极信号难以解读的病灶中,13.6%显示出清晰的ME信号。

结论

与使用标准8mm消融导管的双极信号相比,ME信号引导下的CTI消融效果无差异。虽然ME信号幅度更大,且在双极信号不清晰时有时会出现,但这并未改善手术特征或结果。结果表明,未来的研究应关注病灶完整性而非信号传感。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a8d5/8851573/d04245fa28d8/JOA3-38-106-g006.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验