• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

机器人手术治疗贲门失弛缓症:手术技术、初步经验及文献综述

Robotic Surgery for the Treatment of Achalasia Cardia: Surgical Technique, Initial Experiences and Literature Review.

作者信息

Uzunoglu Mustafa, Altintoprak Fatih, Yalkin Omer, Özdemir Kayhan

机构信息

General Surgery, Bursa City Hospital, Bursa, TUR.

General Surgery, Sakarya University, Serdivan, TUR.

出版信息

Cureus. 2022 Jan 23;14(1):e21510. doi: 10.7759/cureus.21510. eCollection 2022 Jan.

DOI:10.7759/cureus.21510
PMID:35223286
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8863560/
Abstract

Background The outcomes of surgical interventions for achalasia treatment improved with the advent of minimally invasive surgery and the introduction of robotic surgery. This article describes the technical details of robotic achalasia surgery, shares our initial experiences, and discusses why robotic surgery will become the first choice for the surgical treatment of achalasia. Methods The records of patients with a diagnosis of achalasia who underwent robotic surgery were evaluated retrospectively. The patients' data were examined in terms of demographic parameters, duration of complaints, treatment options applied previously, robotic surgery technique, and postoperative outcomes. Results Of the six patients evaluated, four (66.7%) were males and two (33.3%) were females. Their mean age was 32 years (20-51 years), and the mean symptom duration was 4.6 years (2-9 years). All of the patients underwent robotic Heller cardiomyotomy surgery. After the myotomy procedure, five of the six patients (83.3%) underwent partial anterior fundoplication (Dor) as an antireflux procedure. The cruroraphy procedure was performed in one patient (16.7%) due to accompanying hiatal hernia, whereas the procedures were completed in five patients (83.3%) without performing posterior dissection of the oesophagus. In the postoperative follow-up period, no surgical problem was encountered, while reflux symptoms developed in one patient (16.7%) and were controlled by medical therapy. Conclusions The success of surgical treatment of achalasia is incontrovertible. Due to the various advantages of robotic surgery, it is now frequently used in narrow-area surgeries, such as achalasia surgery.

摘要

背景 随着微创手术的出现和机器人手术的引入,贲门失弛缓症手术治疗的效果得到了改善。本文描述了机器人贲门失弛缓症手术的技术细节,分享了我们的初步经验,并讨论了机器人手术为何将成为贲门失弛缓症手术治疗的首选。方法 对诊断为贲门失弛缓症并接受机器人手术的患者记录进行回顾性评估。从人口统计学参数、症状持续时间、先前应用的治疗选择、机器人手术技术和术后结果等方面检查患者数据。结果 在评估的6例患者中,4例(66.7%)为男性,2例(33.3%)为女性。他们的平均年龄为32岁(20 - 51岁),平均症状持续时间为4.6年(2 - 9年)。所有患者均接受了机器人Heller贲门肌切开术。肌切开术后,6例患者中有5例(83.3%)接受了部分前胃底折叠术(Dor)作为抗反流手术。1例患者(16.7%)因伴有食管裂孔疝而进行了膈脚缝合术,而5例患者(83.3%)未进行食管后游离即完成了手术。在术后随访期间,未遇到手术问题,1例患者(16.7%)出现反流症状,经药物治疗得到控制。结论 贲门失弛缓症手术治疗的成功是无可争议的。由于机器人手术具有多种优势,它现在经常用于狭窄区域的手术,如贲门失弛缓症手术。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/80db/8863560/fc1400d50d6b/cureus-0014-00000021510-i08.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/80db/8863560/fb4165f8f604/cureus-0014-00000021510-i01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/80db/8863560/13d882123fc7/cureus-0014-00000021510-i02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/80db/8863560/497b71c24d84/cureus-0014-00000021510-i03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/80db/8863560/a1e778214096/cureus-0014-00000021510-i04.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/80db/8863560/6e74a897eb53/cureus-0014-00000021510-i05.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/80db/8863560/f71dde933754/cureus-0014-00000021510-i06.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/80db/8863560/e85f2a750de1/cureus-0014-00000021510-i07.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/80db/8863560/fc1400d50d6b/cureus-0014-00000021510-i08.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/80db/8863560/fb4165f8f604/cureus-0014-00000021510-i01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/80db/8863560/13d882123fc7/cureus-0014-00000021510-i02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/80db/8863560/497b71c24d84/cureus-0014-00000021510-i03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/80db/8863560/a1e778214096/cureus-0014-00000021510-i04.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/80db/8863560/6e74a897eb53/cureus-0014-00000021510-i05.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/80db/8863560/f71dde933754/cureus-0014-00000021510-i06.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/80db/8863560/e85f2a750de1/cureus-0014-00000021510-i07.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/80db/8863560/fc1400d50d6b/cureus-0014-00000021510-i08.jpg

相似文献

1
Robotic Surgery for the Treatment of Achalasia Cardia: Surgical Technique, Initial Experiences and Literature Review.机器人手术治疗贲门失弛缓症:手术技术、初步经验及文献综述
Cureus. 2022 Jan 23;14(1):e21510. doi: 10.7759/cureus.21510. eCollection 2022 Jan.
2
Robotic Heller-Dor for Idiopathic Achalasia: the Pisa experience.机器人 Heller-Dor 手术治疗特发性贲门失弛缓症:比萨经验。
Updates Surg. 2021 Dec;73(6):2247-2252. doi: 10.1007/s13304-021-01092-6. Epub 2021 May 24.
3
Heller myotomy via minimal-access surgery. An evaluation of antireflux procedures.通过微创手术进行赫勒肌切开术。抗反流手术的评估。
Arch Surg. 1996 Jun;131(6):593-7; discussion 597-8. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.1996.01430180019003.
4
Robotic-assisted Heller Myotomy Is a Safe Operation.机器人辅助 Heller 肌切开术是一种安全的手术。
Isr Med Assoc J. 2021 Oct;23(10):631-634.
5
Quality of life comparing dor and toupet after heller myotomy for achalasia.贲门失弛缓症行Heller肌切开术后Dor术式与Toupet术式的生活质量比较
JSLS. 2014 Jul-Sep;18(3). doi: 10.4293/JSLS.2014.00191.
6
Clinical and pathophysiological outcomes of the robotic-assisted Heller-Dor myotomy for achalasia: a single-center experience.机器人辅助 Heller-Dor 肌切开术治疗贲门失弛缓症的临床和病理生理学结果:单中心经验。
J Robot Surg. 2020 Apr;14(2):331-335. doi: 10.1007/s11701-019-00988-1. Epub 2019 Jun 22.
7
[Long-term results for Heller-myotomy with anterior semifundoplication in achalasia].[贲门失弛缓症行赫勒肌切开术加前半胃底折叠术的长期疗效]
Zentralbl Chir. 2004 Oct;129(5):374-80. doi: 10.1055/s-2004-820373.
8
Robotic versus laparoscopic approach to treat symptomatic achalasia: systematic review with meta-analysis.机器人与腹腔镜治疗症状性贲门失弛缓症的比较:系统评价与荟萃分析。
Dis Esophagus. 2019 Dec 13;32(10):1-8. doi: 10.1093/dote/doz062.
9
Robotic Heller myotomy: a safe operation with higher postoperative quality-of-life indices.机器人辅助Heller肌切开术:一种术后生活质量指标更高的安全手术。
Surgery. 2007 Oct;142(4):613-8; discussion 618-20. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2007.08.003.
10
The choice of optimal antireflux procedure after laparoscopic cardiomyotomy: two decades of clinical experience in one center.腹腔镜贲门肌切开术后最佳抗反流手术的选择:一个中心的二十年临床经验
Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne. 2017 Sep;12(3):238-244. doi: 10.5114/wiitm.2017.68547. Epub 2017 Jun 27.

引用本文的文献

1
Robotic Heller's cardiomyotomy for achalasia: early outcomes for a high-volume UK centre.机器人辅助 Heller 肌切开术治疗贲门失弛缓症:大容量英国中心的早期结果。
Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2024 Apr;106(4):353-358. doi: 10.1308/rcsann.2023.0065. Epub 2023 Oct 16.
2
Establishment of a successful robotic pediatric general surgery practice.建立成功的机器人小儿普通外科实践。
J Robot Surg. 2023 Oct;17(5):2427-2433. doi: 10.1007/s11701-023-01667-y. Epub 2023 Jul 15.

本文引用的文献

1
Perioperative outcomes and cost of robotic-assisted versus laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair.机器人辅助与腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术的围手术期结果和成本。
Surg Endosc. 2020 Aug;34(8):3496-3507. doi: 10.1007/s00464-019-07128-8. Epub 2019 Sep 30.
2
Peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) for achalasia.经口内镜下肌切开术(POEM)治疗贲门失弛缓症。
J Thorac Dis. 2019 Aug;11(Suppl 12):S1618-S1628. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2019.07.84.
3
Robotic and per-oral endoscopic myotomy have fewer technical complications compared to laparoscopic Heller myotomy.
与腹腔镜 Heller 肌切开术相比,机器人辅助和经口内镜肌切开术的技术并发症较少。
Surg Endosc. 2020 Jul;34(7):3191-3196. doi: 10.1007/s00464-019-07093-2. Epub 2019 Sep 3.
4
Systematic Review and Bayesian Network Meta-Analysis Comparing Laparoscopic Heller Myotomy, Pneumatic Dilatation, and Peroral Endoscopic Myotomy for Esophageal Achalasia.比较腹腔镜贲门肌切开术、气囊扩张术和经口内镜下肌切开术治疗贲门失弛缓症的系统评价和贝叶斯网络荟萃分析
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2020 Feb;30(2):147-155. doi: 10.1089/lap.2019.0432. Epub 2019 Jul 31.
5
Robotic versus laparoscopic approach to treat symptomatic achalasia: systematic review with meta-analysis.机器人与腹腔镜治疗症状性贲门失弛缓症的比较:系统评价与荟萃分析。
Dis Esophagus. 2019 Dec 13;32(10):1-8. doi: 10.1093/dote/doz062.
6
Clinical and pathophysiological outcomes of the robotic-assisted Heller-Dor myotomy for achalasia: a single-center experience.机器人辅助 Heller-Dor 肌切开术治疗贲门失弛缓症的临床和病理生理学结果:单中心经验。
J Robot Surg. 2020 Apr;14(2):331-335. doi: 10.1007/s11701-019-00988-1. Epub 2019 Jun 22.
7
Optimal surgical intervention for achalasia: laparoscopic or robotic approach.贲门失弛缓症的最佳手术干预:腹腔镜还是机器人方法。
J Robot Surg. 2019 Jun;13(3):397-400. doi: 10.1007/s11701-018-0865-7. Epub 2018 Sep 14.
8
Laparoscopic Heller myotomy.腹腔镜下贲门肌层切开术。
J Visc Surg. 2018 Feb;155(1):59-64. doi: 10.1016/j.jviscsurg.2018.01.006. Epub 2018 Feb 21.
9
Robotic versus laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy: a French prospective single-center experience and cost-effectiveness analysis.机器人与腹腔镜胰体尾切除术:法国单中心前瞻性经验及成本效益分析。
Surg Endosc. 2018 Aug;32(8):3562-3569. doi: 10.1007/s00464-018-6080-9. Epub 2018 Feb 2.
10
Peroral endoscopic myotomy achieves similar clinical response but incurs lesser charges compared to robotic heller myotomy.经口内镜下肌切开术与机器人辅助赫勒肌切开术相比,临床反应相似,但费用更低。
Saudi J Gastroenterol. 2017 Mar-Apr;23(2):91-96. doi: 10.4103/1319-3767.203360.