Kamran Muhammad, Khalid Abdullah B, Siddiqui H A Basit, Aftab Azib, Azmat Rabeea
Gastroenterology, Fazaia Ruth Pfau Medical College, Karachi, PAK.
National Institute of Liver and Gastrointestinal Diseases, Dow International Medical College, Karachi, PAK.
Cureus. 2022 Jan 23;14(1):e21517. doi: 10.7759/cureus.21517. eCollection 2022 Jan.
Background Patients with known liver cirrhosis, irrespective of the etiology, have poor outcomes when put on invasive mechanical ventilation in an intensive care unit (ICU) setting. The clinical situation becomes even more complicated when such patients are managed in a non-transplant center. Various factors are associated with poor outcomes, and hence, various scoring systems are available to help determine the prognosis in patients with liver cirrhosis. These scoring systems are broadly classified into two categories, namely, ICU-specific scoring systems and liver disease-specific scoring systems. There is a dearth of data from Pakistan regarding which score better determines the prognosis of patients with liver cirrhosis admitted to the ICU. In this study, we aimed to determine the outcome of cirrhotic patients requiring invasive mechanical ventilation in a non-transplant tertiary care hospital in Pakistan using ICU-specific and liver disease-specific scoring systems. Methodology A retrospective study design was applied to a record of 88 cirrhotic patients admitted to the medical ICU of a tertiary care teaching hospital in Karachi, Pakistan, from January 2016 to November 2016. Patients with acute hepatitis were excluded. Data on patients' characteristics, the reason for intubation, hepatic encephalopathy, the need for vasopressor support, and the duration of ICU and hospital stay were collected. Moreover, the first-day Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II, Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA), Child-Turcotte-Pugh (CTP), and Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) scores were calculated, with mortality being the primary outcome measure. Results The most common etiology was hepatitis C (52.3%, 46/88). The most common reason for intubation was airway protection (57.9%, 51/88). Overall mortality was 71.6% (63/88). On univariate analysis, CTP score >10, MELD score >18, hepatic encephalopathy, bilirubin, prothrombin time, presence of tense ascites, and APACHE II were significantly associated with mortality. On multivariate analysis, CTP score >10 (odd ratio = 21; 95% confidence interval (CI): 4-104; p < 0.001) was an independent predictor of mortality. Area under curve was 0.89 (95% CI = 0.82-0.96) for CTP, 0.86 (95% CI = 0.77-0.95) for MELD, 0.81 (95% CI = 0.69-0.92) for APACHE II, and 0.81 (95% CI = 0.71-0.91) for SOFA in predicting mortality. Conclusions CTP and MELD scores are better predictors of short-term mortality in patients with liver cirrhosis requiring invasive mechanical ventilation compared to APACHE II and SOFA scores. CTP score >10 was an independent predictor of mortality.
已知患有肝硬化的患者,无论病因如何,在重症监护病房(ICU)接受有创机械通气时预后较差。当此类患者在非移植中心接受治疗时,临床情况会变得更加复杂。多种因素与不良预后相关,因此,有多种评分系统可用于帮助确定肝硬化患者的预后。这些评分系统大致分为两类,即特定于ICU的评分系统和特定于肝病的评分系统。在巴基斯坦,关于哪种评分能更好地确定入住ICU的肝硬化患者的预后的数据匮乏。在本研究中,我们旨在使用特定于ICU和特定于肝病的评分系统,确定巴基斯坦一家非移植三级护理医院中需要有创机械通气的肝硬化患者的预后。
采用回顾性研究设计,对2016年1月至2016年11月在巴基斯坦卡拉奇一家三级护理教学医院的内科ICU住院的88例肝硬化患者的记录进行分析。排除急性肝炎患者。收集患者的特征、插管原因、肝性脑病、血管升压药支持需求以及ICU住院时间和住院时间的数据。此外,计算第一天的急性生理与慢性健康评估(APACHE)II、序贯器官衰竭评估(SOFA)、Child-Turcotte-Pugh(CTP)和终末期肝病模型(MELD)评分,以死亡率作为主要结局指标。
最常见的病因是丙型肝炎(52.3%,46/88)。最常见的插管原因是气道保护(57.9%,51/88)。总体死亡率为71.6%(63/88)。单因素分析显示,CTP评分>10、MELD评分>18、肝性脑病、胆红素、凝血酶原时间、存在大量腹水和APACHE II与死亡率显著相关。多因素分析显示,CTP评分>10(比值比=21;95%置信区间(CI):4-104;p<0.001)是死亡率的独立预测因素。CTP预测死亡率的曲线下面积为0.89(95%CI=0.82-0.96),MELD为0.86(95%CI=0.77-0.95),APACHE II为0.81(95%CI=0.69-0.92),SOFA为0.81(95%CI=0.71-0.91)。
与APACHE II和SOFA评分相比,CTP和MELD评分是需要有创机械通气的肝硬化患者短期死亡率的更好预测指标。CTP评分>10是死亡率的独立预测因素。