• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

需要有创机械通气的肝硬化患者预后的预测因素:来自巴基斯坦一家非移植三级护理医院的经验

Predictors of Outcome of Cirrhotic Patients Requiring Invasive Mechanical Ventilation: Experience From a Non-Transplant Tertiary Care Hospital in Pakistan.

作者信息

Kamran Muhammad, Khalid Abdullah B, Siddiqui H A Basit, Aftab Azib, Azmat Rabeea

机构信息

Gastroenterology, Fazaia Ruth Pfau Medical College, Karachi, PAK.

National Institute of Liver and Gastrointestinal Diseases, Dow International Medical College, Karachi, PAK.

出版信息

Cureus. 2022 Jan 23;14(1):e21517. doi: 10.7759/cureus.21517. eCollection 2022 Jan.

DOI:10.7759/cureus.21517
PMID:35223293
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8862690/
Abstract

Background Patients with known liver cirrhosis, irrespective of the etiology, have poor outcomes when put on invasive mechanical ventilation in an intensive care unit (ICU) setting. The clinical situation becomes even more complicated when such patients are managed in a non-transplant center. Various factors are associated with poor outcomes, and hence, various scoring systems are available to help determine the prognosis in patients with liver cirrhosis. These scoring systems are broadly classified into two categories, namely, ICU-specific scoring systems and liver disease-specific scoring systems. There is a dearth of data from Pakistan regarding which score better determines the prognosis of patients with liver cirrhosis admitted to the ICU. In this study, we aimed to determine the outcome of cirrhotic patients requiring invasive mechanical ventilation in a non-transplant tertiary care hospital in Pakistan using ICU-specific and liver disease-specific scoring systems. Methodology A retrospective study design was applied to a record of 88 cirrhotic patients admitted to the medical ICU of a tertiary care teaching hospital in Karachi, Pakistan, from January 2016 to November 2016. Patients with acute hepatitis were excluded. Data on patients' characteristics, the reason for intubation, hepatic encephalopathy, the need for vasopressor support, and the duration of ICU and hospital stay were collected. Moreover, the first-day Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II, Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA), Child-Turcotte-Pugh (CTP), and Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) scores were calculated, with mortality being the primary outcome measure. Results The most common etiology was hepatitis C (52.3%, 46/88). The most common reason for intubation was airway protection (57.9%, 51/88). Overall mortality was 71.6% (63/88). On univariate analysis, CTP score >10, MELD score >18, hepatic encephalopathy, bilirubin, prothrombin time, presence of tense ascites, and APACHE II were significantly associated with mortality. On multivariate analysis, CTP score >10 (odd ratio = 21; 95% confidence interval (CI): 4-104; p < 0.001) was an independent predictor of mortality. Area under curve was 0.89 (95% CI = 0.82-0.96) for CTP, 0.86 (95% CI = 0.77-0.95) for MELD, 0.81 (95% CI = 0.69-0.92) for APACHE II, and 0.81 (95% CI = 0.71-0.91) for SOFA in predicting mortality. Conclusions CTP and MELD scores are better predictors of short-term mortality in patients with liver cirrhosis requiring invasive mechanical ventilation compared to APACHE II and SOFA scores. CTP score >10 was an independent predictor of mortality.

摘要

背景

已知患有肝硬化的患者,无论病因如何,在重症监护病房(ICU)接受有创机械通气时预后较差。当此类患者在非移植中心接受治疗时,临床情况会变得更加复杂。多种因素与不良预后相关,因此,有多种评分系统可用于帮助确定肝硬化患者的预后。这些评分系统大致分为两类,即特定于ICU的评分系统和特定于肝病的评分系统。在巴基斯坦,关于哪种评分能更好地确定入住ICU的肝硬化患者的预后的数据匮乏。在本研究中,我们旨在使用特定于ICU和特定于肝病的评分系统,确定巴基斯坦一家非移植三级护理医院中需要有创机械通气的肝硬化患者的预后。

方法

采用回顾性研究设计,对2016年1月至2016年11月在巴基斯坦卡拉奇一家三级护理教学医院的内科ICU住院的88例肝硬化患者的记录进行分析。排除急性肝炎患者。收集患者的特征、插管原因、肝性脑病、血管升压药支持需求以及ICU住院时间和住院时间的数据。此外,计算第一天的急性生理与慢性健康评估(APACHE)II、序贯器官衰竭评估(SOFA)、Child-Turcotte-Pugh(CTP)和终末期肝病模型(MELD)评分,以死亡率作为主要结局指标。

结果

最常见的病因是丙型肝炎(52.3%,46/88)。最常见的插管原因是气道保护(57.9%,51/88)。总体死亡率为71.6%(63/88)。单因素分析显示,CTP评分>10、MELD评分>18、肝性脑病、胆红素、凝血酶原时间、存在大量腹水和APACHE II与死亡率显著相关。多因素分析显示,CTP评分>10(比值比=21;95%置信区间(CI):4-104;p<0.001)是死亡率的独立预测因素。CTP预测死亡率的曲线下面积为0.89(95%CI=0.82-0.96),MELD为0.86(95%CI=0.77-0.95),APACHE II为0.81(95%CI=0.69-0.92),SOFA为0.81(95%CI=0.71-0.91)。

结论

与APACHE II和SOFA评分相比,CTP和MELD评分是需要有创机械通气的肝硬化患者短期死亡率的更好预测指标。CTP评分>10是死亡率的独立预测因素。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5905/8862690/981ec3a11cbc/cureus-0014-00000021517-i02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5905/8862690/518c532a336d/cureus-0014-00000021517-i01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5905/8862690/981ec3a11cbc/cureus-0014-00000021517-i02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5905/8862690/518c532a336d/cureus-0014-00000021517-i01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5905/8862690/981ec3a11cbc/cureus-0014-00000021517-i02.jpg

相似文献

1
Predictors of Outcome of Cirrhotic Patients Requiring Invasive Mechanical Ventilation: Experience From a Non-Transplant Tertiary Care Hospital in Pakistan.需要有创机械通气的肝硬化患者预后的预测因素:来自巴基斯坦一家非移植三级护理医院的经验
Cureus. 2022 Jan 23;14(1):e21517. doi: 10.7759/cureus.21517. eCollection 2022 Jan.
2
Prognostication of critically ill patients with acute-on-chronic liver failure using the Chronic Liver Failure-Sequential Organ Failure Assessment: A Canadian retrospective study.使用慢性肝衰竭-序贯器官衰竭评估对急性慢性肝衰竭重症患者进行预后评估:一项加拿大回顾性研究。
J Crit Care. 2016 Dec;36:234-239. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2016.08.003. Epub 2016 Aug 10.
3
APACHE II score is superior to SOFA, CTP and MELD in predicting the short-term mortality in patients with acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF).APACHE II 评分优于 SOFA、CTP 和 MELD,可预测慢加急性肝衰竭(ACLF)患者的短期死亡率。
J Dig Dis. 2013 Sep;14(9):484-90. doi: 10.1111/1751-2980.12074.
4
Comparison of prognostic systems in cirrhotic patients with hepatic encephalopathy.肝硬化合并肝性脑病患者预后系统的比较
Turk J Med Sci. 2018 Jun 14;48(3):543-547. doi: 10.3906/sag-1709-32.
5
Comparison of the predictive value of scoring systems on the prognosis of cirrhotic patients with suspected infection.评分系统对疑似感染肝硬化患者预后预测价值的比较
Medicine (Baltimore). 2018 Jul;97(28):e11421. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000011421.
6
Profile and outcome of patients with liver cirrhosis requiring mechanical ventilation.肝硬化患者机械通气的特征和预后。
J Intensive Care Med. 2012 Nov-Dec;27(6):373-8. doi: 10.1177/0885066611400277. Epub 2011 Mar 24.
7
Establishment of MELD-lactate clearance scoring system in predicting death risk of critically ill cirrhotic patients.MELD-乳酸清除评分系统的建立在预测危重症肝硬化患者死亡风险中的应用。
BMC Gastroenterol. 2022 Jun 3;22(1):280. doi: 10.1186/s12876-022-02351-5.
8
Prognostic markers in cirrhotic patients requiring intensive care: a comparative prospective study.需要重症监护的肝硬化患者的预后标志物:一项比较性前瞻性研究。
Ann Hepatol. 2012 Jul-Aug;11(4):513-8.
9
Model for End-Stage Liver Disease score predicts mortality in critically ill cirrhotic patients.终末期肝病模型评分可预测重症肝硬化患者的死亡率。
J Crit Care. 2014 Oct;29(5):881.e7-13. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2014.05.013. Epub 2014 May 28.
10
Predicting Mortality Across a Broad Spectrum of Liver Disease-An Assessment of Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD), Child-Turcotte-Pugh (CTP), and Creatinine-Modified CTP Scores.预测广泛肝病患者的死亡率——对终末期肝病模型(MELD)、Child-Turcotte-Pugh(CTP)评分以及肌酐修正CTP评分的评估
J Clin Exp Hepatol. 2011 Dec;1(3):161-8. doi: 10.1016/S0973-6883(11)60233-8. Epub 2012 Jan 2.

引用本文的文献

1
Nonlinear association between AST/ALT ratio and 28-day all-cause mortality following ICU admission in critically ill cirrhotic patients: a retrospective cohort study.危重症肝硬化患者入住重症监护病房后谷草转氨酶/谷丙转氨酶比值与28天全因死亡率之间的非线性关联:一项回顾性队列研究
BMC Gastroenterol. 2025 May 13;25(1):367. doi: 10.1186/s12876-025-03966-0.

本文引用的文献

1
Outcome of liver cirrhosis patients requiring prolonged mechanical ventilation.需要长时间机械通气的肝硬化患者的结局。
Sci Rep. 2020 Mar 18;10(1):4980. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-61601-2.
2
A Comprehensive Review of Outcome Predictors in Low MELD Patients.低 MELD 患者预后预测因素的全面综述。
Transplantation. 2020 Feb;104(2):242-250. doi: 10.1097/TP.0000000000002956.
3
Factors affecting the outcome of hospitalization among liver cirrhosis patients.影响肝硬化患者住院结局的因素。
Pak J Med Sci. 2019 Sep-Oct;35(5):1382-1386. doi: 10.12669/pjms.35.5.884.
4
Predictors of Mortality in the Critically Ill Cirrhotic Patient: Is the Model for End-Stage Liver Disease Enough?重症肝硬化患者死亡的预测因素:终末期肝病模型是否足够?
J Am Coll Surg. 2017 Mar;224(3):276-282. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2016.11.005. Epub 2016 Nov 22.
5
Significant Morbidity and Mortality Among Hospitalized End-Stage Liver Disease Patients in Medicare.医疗保险中住院的终末期肝病患者的严重发病率和死亡率
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2016 Sep;52(3):412-419.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2016.03.013. Epub 2016 Jun 3.
6
Outcome of patients with cirrhosis requiring mechanical ventilation in ICU.ICU 中需要机械通气的肝硬化患者的转归。
J Hepatol. 2014 Mar;60(3):570-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2013.11.012. Epub 2013 Nov 23.
7
Frequency of poor quality of life and predictors of health related quality of life in cirrhosis at a tertiary care hospital Pakistan.巴基斯坦一家三级护理医院肝硬化患者生活质量低下的发生率及健康相关生活质量的预测因素
BMC Res Notes. 2012 Aug 20;5:446. doi: 10.1186/1756-0500-5-446.
8
In-hospital mortality among a cohort of cirrhotic patients admitted to a tertiary hospital.在一家三级医院住院的肝硬化患者队列中的住院死亡率。
Saudi J Gastroenterol. 2011 Nov-Dec;17(6):387-90. doi: 10.4103/1319-3767.87179.
9
Outcome predictors and new score of critically ill cirrhotic patients with acute renal failure.急性肾衰竭的重症肝硬化患者的预后预测因素及新评分
Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2008 Jun;23(6):1961-9. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfm914. Epub 2008 Jan 10.
10
Prognostic models in cirrhotics admitted to intensive care units better predict outcome when assessed at 48 h after admission.对于入住重症监护病房的肝硬化患者,预后模型在入院后48小时进行评估时能更好地预测结局。
J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2008 Aug;23(8 Pt 1):1223-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1746.2007.05269.x. Epub 2007 Dec 13.