Institute of Earth Resources, Faculty of Mining, Ecology, Process Control and Geotechnologies, Technical University of Košice, Košice, Slovakia.
Department of Marketing and International Trade, Faculty of Management and Business, University of Prešov, Prešov, Slovakia.
Front Public Health. 2022 Feb 10;10:757065. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.757065. eCollection 2022.
In the Slovak Republic, a mass testing of the entire population was performed. Estimates show that this testing cost more than 400 million EUR and thousands of euros were paid for one positively identified case. Thus, it is possible to state a high cost for such a project, which has been criticized by many parties. On the other hand, from a public health point of view, mass testing has helped fight the pandemic. Both the health and economic perspectives are important in assessing the success of a pandemic strategy, but the social perspective is equally important. In fact, the situation is perceived from the position of public leaders who make decisions, but also from the position of the society that bears individual political decisions. It is not appropriate to forget about the society that is most affected by restrictions, testing, health status, but also the burden on the state budget. The objective of the presented research was to examine the perception of testing for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in the Slovak population. Non-parametric difference tests and correspondence analysis were used for statistical processing. The research sample consisted of 806 respondents and data collection took place in February 2021. The main findings include significant differences in perceptions between the first and the last participation in testing in terms of gender, age, testing experience, and time aspect. The last participation in testing showed lower rates of positive aspects related to the internal motivation to test compared to the first participation. In contrast, external stimulation by government regulations related to restrictions in the absence of a negative result was higher in the last participation in testing. There were also differences between the first and the last test in the level of doubts about the accuracy of the test result, while a higher level was found at the last testing participation. It can be concluded that the frequency of testing and its requirements need to be approached very carefully over time, as it is likely that the positive perceptions may deteriorate. The recommendations include clear and timely government communication, trust building and health education.
在斯洛伐克共和国,对全体人口进行了大规模检测。据估计,这项检测耗资超过 4 亿欧元,每确诊一例就要花费数千欧元。因此,可以说这个项目的成本很高,这也受到了许多方面的批评。另一方面,从公共卫生的角度来看,大规模检测有助于抗击大流行。从评估大流行战略的成功角度来看,健康和经济两个方面都很重要,但社会视角同样重要。事实上,情况是从做出决策的公共卫生领导人的立场,以及从承担个人政治决策的社会的立场来看待的。忽略受限制、检测、健康状况以及国家预算负担影响最大的社会是不合适的。本研究的目的是检验斯洛伐克人口对 2019 年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)检测的看法。采用非参数差异检验和对应分析进行统计处理。研究样本由 806 名受访者组成,数据收集于 2021 年 2 月进行。主要发现包括:在性别、年龄、检测经验和时间方面,第一次和最后一次参加检测的人对检测的看法存在显著差异。与第一次参加检测相比,最后一次参加检测的人在与内在动机相关的积极方面的比例较低。相反,最后一次参加检测的人对外界刺激的反应更高,即政府对没有阴性结果的限制相关的规定。在对检测结果准确性的怀疑程度方面,第一次和最后一次检测也存在差异,最后一次检测的怀疑程度更高。可以得出结论,随着时间的推移,需要非常谨慎地对待检测的频率及其要求,因为积极的看法可能会恶化。建议包括政府进行清晰、及时的沟通,建立信任和健康教育。