Carta Arcangelo F, Lichtblau Mona, Berlier Charlotte, Saxer Stéphanie, Schneider Simon R, Schwarz Esther I, Furian Michael, Bloch Konrad E, Ulrich Silvia
Department of Pulmonology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Front Med (Lausanne). 2022 Feb 11;9:791423. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2022.791423. eCollection 2022.
Pure oxygen breathing (hyperoxia) may improve hemodynamics in patients with pulmonary hypertension (PH) and allows to calculate right-to-left shunt fraction (Qs/Qt), whereas breathing normobaric hypoxia may accelerate hypoxic pulmonary vasoconstriction (HPV). This study investigates how hyperoxia and hypoxia affect mean pulmonary artery pressure (mPAP) and pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) in patients with PH and whether Qs/Qt influences the changes of mPAP and PVR.
Adults with pulmonary arterial or chronic thromboembolic PH (PAH/CTEPH) underwent repetitive hemodynamic and blood gas measurements during right heart catheterization (RHC) under normoxia [fractions of inspiratory oxygen (FiO) 0.21], hypoxia (FiO 0.15), and hyperoxia (FiO 1.0) for at least 10 min.
We included 149 patients (79/70 PAH/CTEPH, 59% women, mean ± SD 60 ± 17 years). Multivariable regressions (mean change, ) showed that hypoxia did not affect mPAP and cardiac index, but increased PVR [0.4 (0.1-0.7) WU, = 0.021] due to decreased pulmonary artery wedge pressure [-0.54 (-0.92 to -0.162), = 0.005]. Hyperoxia significantly decreased mPAP [-4.4 (-5.5 to -3.3) mmHg, < 0.001] and PVR [-0.4 (-0.7 to -0.1) WU, = 0.006] compared with normoxia. The Qs/Qt (14 ± 6%) was >10 in 75% of subjects but changes of mPAP and PVR under hyperoxia and hypoxia were independent of Qs/Qt.
Acute exposure to hypoxia did not relevantly alter pulmonary hemodynamics indicating a blunted HPV-response in PH. In contrast, hyperoxia remarkably reduced mPAP and PVR, indicating a preserved vasodilator response to oxygen and possibly supporting the oxygen therapy in patients with PH. A high proportion of patients with PH showed increased Qs/Qt, which, however, was not associated with changes in pulmonary hemodynamics in response to changes in FiO.
纯氧呼吸(高氧)可能改善肺动脉高压(PH)患者的血流动力学,并可用于计算右向左分流分数(Qs/Qt),而常压性缺氧呼吸可能会加速缺氧性肺血管收缩(HPV)。本研究探讨高氧和缺氧如何影响PH患者的平均肺动脉压(mPAP)和肺血管阻力(PVR),以及Qs/Qt是否会影响mPAP和PVR的变化。
患有肺动脉高压或慢性血栓栓塞性肺动脉高压(PAH/CTEPH)的成年人在常氧[吸入氧分数(FiO)0.21]、缺氧(FiO 0.15)和高氧(FiO 1.0)条件下进行右心导管检查(RHC)时,进行重复的血流动力学和血气测量,持续至少10分钟。
我们纳入了149例患者(79/70例PAH/CTEPH,59%为女性,平均±标准差60±17岁)。多变量回归(平均变化,)显示,缺氧不影响mPAP和心脏指数,但由于肺动脉楔压降低[-0.54(-0.92至-0.162),P = 0.005],导致PVR升高[0.4(0.1-0.7)WU,P = 0.021]。与常氧相比,高氧显著降低了mPAP[-4.4(-5.5至-3.3)mmHg,P < 0.001]和PVR[-0.4(-0.7至-0.1)WU,P = 0.006]。75%的受试者的Qs/Qt(14±6%)>10,但高氧和缺氧条件下mPAP和PVR的变化与Qs/Qt无关。
急性缺氧暴露对肺血流动力学无显著影响,表明PH患者的HPV反应减弱。相反,高氧显著降低了mPAP和PVR,表明对氧的血管舒张反应保留,可能支持PH患者的氧疗。高比例的PH患者显示Qs/Qt升高,然而,这与FiO变化引起的肺血流动力学变化无关。