Division of Cardiovascular Surgery Peter Munk Cardiac Centre University Health NetworkUniversity of Toronto Toronto ON Canada.
Division of Cardiac Surgery Schulich Heart Centre Department of Surgery Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre University of Toronto Toronto ON Canada.
J Am Heart Assoc. 2022 Mar;11(5):e022770. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.121.022770. Epub 2022 Feb 28.
Background The degree of hospital-level variation in the ratio of percutaneous coronary interventions to coronary artery bypass grafting procedures (PCI:CABG) and the association of the PCI:CABG ratio with clinical outcome are unknown. Methods and Results In a multicenter population-based study conducted in Ontario, Canada, we identified 44 288 patients from 19 institutions who had nonemergent diagnostic angiograms indicating severe multivessel coronary artery disease (2013-2017) and underwent a coronary revascularization procedure within 90 days. Hospitals were divided into tertiles according to their adjusted PCI:CABG ratio into low (0.70-0.85, n=17 487), medium (1.01-1.17, n=15 275), and high (1.18-1.29, n=11 526) ratio institutions. Compared with low PCI:CABG ratio hospitals, hazard ratios (HRs) for major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events were higher at medium (HR, 1.19; 95% CI, 1.14-1.25) and high ratio (HR, 1.21; 95% CI, 1.15-1.27) hospitals during a median 3.3 (interquartile range 2.1-4.6) years follow-up. When interventional cardiologists performed the diagnostic angiogram, the odds of the patient receiving PCI was higher (odds ratio, 1.37; 95% CI, 1.23-1.52) than when it was performed by noninterventional cardiologists, after accounting for patient characteristics. Having the diagnostic angiogram at an institution without cardiac surgical capabilities was independently associated with a higher risk of major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (HR, 1.07; 95% CI, 1.02-1.11), death (HR, 1.09; 95% CI, 1.02-1.18), and myocardial infarction (HR, 1.10; 95% CI, 1.03-1.17). Conclusions Patients undergoing diagnostic angiography in hospitals with higher PCI:CABG ratio had higher rates of adverse outcomes, including major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events, myocardial infarction, and repeat revascularization. Presence of on-site cardiac surgery was associated with better survival and lower major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events.
经皮冠状动脉介入治疗与冠状动脉旁路移植术(PCI:CABG)之比的医院级别差异程度以及该比值与临床结局的关系尚不清楚。
在加拿大安大略省进行的一项多中心基于人群的研究中,我们从 19 家机构中确定了 44288 名患有非紧急诊断性血管造影提示严重多血管冠状动脉疾病(2013-2017 年)且在 90 天内进行冠状动脉血运重建的患者。根据调整后的 PCI:CABG 比值,将医院分为低比值(0.70-0.85,n=17487)、中比值(1.01-1.17,n=15275)和高比值(1.18-1.29,n=11526)组。与低 PCI:CABG 比值的医院相比,中比值(HR,1.19;95%CI,1.14-1.25)和高比值(HR,1.21;95%CI,1.15-1.27)医院的主要不良心脏和脑血管事件的危险比(HR)在中位数为 3.3 年(四分位距 2.1-4.6)的随访期间更高。当介入心脏病专家进行诊断性血管造影时,与非介入心脏病专家进行诊断性血管造影相比,患者接受 PCI 的可能性更高(优势比,1.37;95%CI,1.23-1.52),同时考虑到患者特征。在没有心脏外科能力的机构进行诊断性血管造影与主要不良心脏和脑血管事件(HR,1.07;95%CI,1.02-1.11)、死亡(HR,1.09;95%CI,1.02-1.18)和心肌梗死(HR,1.10;95%CI,1.03-1.17)的风险增加独立相关。
在 PCI:CABG 比值较高的医院进行诊断性血管造影的患者不良结局发生率较高,包括主要不良心脏和脑血管事件、心肌梗死和再次血运重建。现场心脏手术的存在与更好的生存和更低的主要不良心脏和脑血管事件相关。