Heart Team Without Borders: Taking the Heart Team Beyond the Institution.
作者信息
Senman Balimkiz, Rao Sunil V
机构信息
Duke University Health System Durham NC.
The Duke Clinical Research Institute Durham NC.
出版信息
J Am Heart Assoc. 2022 Mar;11(5):e025080. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.122.025080. Epub 2022 Feb 28.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Heart Team Without Borders: Taking the Heart Team Beyond the Institution.无疆界心脏团队：将心脏团队拓展至机构之外
J Am Heart Assoc. 2022 Mar;11(5):e025080. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.122.025080. Epub 2022 Feb 28.
2
Comparison of Heart Team vs Interventional Cardiologist Recommendations for the Treatment of Patients With Multivessel Coronary Artery Disease.多支冠状动脉疾病患者治疗中心脏团队与介入心脏病专家推荐的比较。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Aug 3;3(8):e2012749. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.12749.
3
Structure and functioning of the Heart Team: primum non nocere.心脏团队的结构与运作：首要的是不伤害。
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2015 Oct;48(4):529-30. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezv264. Epub 2015 Aug 4.
4
The coronary heart team.冠心病治疗团队。
Curr Opin Cardiol. 2017 Sep;32(5):627-632. doi: 10.1097/HCO.0000000000000432.
5
Is There a Difference in Efficacy of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Focal and Diffuse Stable Coronary Artery Disease?经皮冠状动脉介入治疗对局限性和弥漫性稳定型冠状动脉疾病的疗效是否存在差异？
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2021 Aug;14(8):e011013. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.121.011013. Epub 2021 Aug 3.
6
Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Versus Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting in Patients With Left Ventricular Dysfunction: Do We Have the Evidence?左心室功能不全患者经皮冠状动脉介入治疗与冠状动脉旁路移植术：我们有证据吗？
Circulation. 2016 May 31;133(22):2125-7. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.116.022733. Epub 2016 May 5.
7
Impact of Fractional Flow Reserve Derived From Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography on Heart Team Treatment Decision-Making in Patients With Multivessel Coronary Artery Disease: Insights From the SYNTAX III REVOLUTION Trial.基于冠状动脉计算机断层扫描血管造影的血流储备分数对多支冠状动脉疾病患者心脏团队治疗决策的影响：来自 SYNTAX III REVOLUTION 试验的见解。
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2019 Dec;12(12):e007607. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.118.007607. Epub 2019 Dec 13.
8
Treatment Recommendations for Patients With Multivessel Coronary Artery Disease-There Is No "I" in Heart Team, But Is the Heart Team Better Than the I?多支冠状动脉疾病患者的治疗建议——“心脏团队”中没有“我”，但心脏团队比个人更好吗？
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Aug 3;3(8):e2013098. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.13098.
9
Heart Team decision making and long-term outcomes for 1000 consecutive cases of coronary artery disease.心脏团队决策与1000例连续冠状动脉疾病患者的长期预后
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2019 Feb 1;28(2):206-213. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivy237.
10
Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Among Patients With Prior Percutaneous Coronary Interventions.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后行冠状动脉旁路移植术。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2018 Oct 16;7(20):e010609. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.118.010609.
本文引用的文献
1
Variations in Coronary Revascularization Practices and Their Effect on Long-Term Outcomes.冠状动脉血运重建术的变化及其对长期预后的影响。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2022 Mar;11(5):e022770. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.121.022770. Epub 2022 Feb 28.
2
Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Following Diagnostic Angiography by Noninterventional Versus Interventional Cardiologists: Insights From the CathPCI Registry.非介入心脏病专家与介入心脏病专家行诊断性冠状动脉造影后行经皮冠状动脉介入治疗：来自 CathPCI 注册研究的见解。
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2022 Jan;15(1):e011086. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.121.011086. Epub 2021 Dec 22.
3
2021 ACC/AHA/SCAI Guideline for Coronary Artery Revascularization: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines.2021年美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会/心血管造影和介入学会冠状动脉血运重建指南：美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会临床实践指南联合委员会报告
Circulation. 2022 Jan 18;145(3):e18-e114. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000001038. Epub 2021 Dec 9.
4
Multidisciplinary Heart Team Approach for Complex Coronary Artery Disease: Single Center Clinical Presentation.多学科心脏团队治疗复杂冠状动脉疾病：单中心临床报告。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2020 Apr 21;9(8):e014738. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.119.014738. Epub 2020 Apr 20.
5
Strategies for multivessel revascularization in patients with diabetes.多血管血运重建策略在糖尿病患者中的应用。
N Engl J Med. 2012 Dec 20;367(25):2375-84. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1211585. Epub 2012 Nov 4.
6
Effects of multidisciplinary team working on breast cancer survival: retrospective, comparative, interventional cohort study of 13 722 women.多学科团队协作对乳腺癌生存的影响：对 13722 名女性的回顾性、比较性、干预性队列研究。
BMJ. 2012 Apr 26;344:e2718. doi: 10.1136/bmj.e2718.
7
Impact of a multidisciplinary tumour board meeting for upper-GI malignancies on clinical decision making: a prospective cohort study.多学科肿瘤委员会会议对上消化道恶性肿瘤临床决策的影响：一项前瞻性队列研究。
Int J Clin Oncol. 2013 Apr;18(2):214-9. doi: 10.1007/s10147-011-0362-8. Epub 2011 Dec 23.
8
Determinants of variations in coronary revascularization practices.冠状动脉血运重建术实践差异的决定因素。
CMAJ. 2012 Feb 7;184(2):179-86. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.111072. Epub 2011 Dec 12.
9
Guidelines on myocardial revascularization.心肌血运重建指南。
Eur Heart J. 2010 Oct;31(20):2501-55. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehq277. Epub 2010 Aug 29.
10
Percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary-artery bypass grafting for severe coronary artery disease.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗与冠状动脉旁路移植术治疗严重冠状动脉疾病的比较
N Engl J Med. 2009 Mar 5;360(10):961-72. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0804626. Epub 2009 Feb 18.
Zotero 插件