Department of Policy Analysis & Management, 5922Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA.
Department of Management of Technology, 34965Konkuk University, Gwangjin-gu, Seoul, Korea.
Res Aging. 2022 Oct-Dec;44(9-10):692-708. doi: 10.1177/01640275211046322. Epub 2022 Feb 27.
This paper examines household decisions over long-term care insurance (LTCI) purchases through a bargaining lens. Long-term care insurance purchase is a discrete decision around which spouses' interests may diverge substantially. The cost of buying LTCI is typically borne by both spouses, but the benefits of LTCI go disproportionately to women, who are more likely to need long-term care for themselves, and to benefit from the asset protection and other support LTCI offers in the event their husband needs care. Using panel data on married couples ages 50-75 from the US Health and Retirement Study (HRS), we test and find support for the hypothesis that spouses' relative bargaining power is related to LTCI purchase decisions. In particular, when husbands have final say in household decisions, LTCI coverage is less likely. The findings suggest that spouse's relative bargaining power matters for health care choices and, therefore, for the welfare of older men and women.
本文从谈判视角考察了家庭购买长期护理保险(LTCI)的决策。购买长期护理保险是一个离散决策,在此过程中配偶双方的利益可能存在很大分歧。购买 LTCI 的成本通常由夫妻双方共同承担,但 LTCI 的收益却不成比例地流向女性,因为女性更有可能需要长期护理,并且在丈夫需要护理时,LTCI 能够提供资产保护和其他支持,使她们受益。我们利用美国健康与退休研究(HRS)中 50-75 岁已婚夫妇的面板数据进行检验,结果支持这样一种假设,即配偶相对谈判力与 LTCI 购买决策有关。具体来说,当丈夫对家庭决策拥有最终发言权时,购买 LTCI 的可能性就较小。这些发现表明,配偶的相对谈判力对医疗保健选择很重要,因此对老年男女的福利很重要。