• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

物理治疗师住院医师以能力为基础的教育:评估工具的开发。

Physical Therapist Residency Competency-Based Education: Development of an Assessment Instrument.

机构信息

Residency and Fellowship Education, American Physical Therapy Association, Alexandria, Virginia, USA.

Division of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.

出版信息

Phys Ther. 2022 May 5;102(5). doi: 10.1093/ptj/pzac019.

DOI:10.1093/ptj/pzac019
PMID:35225348
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to develop generic domains of competence (DoC) with associated competencies and milestones for physical therapist residency education. This work was intended to culminate in establishing validity evidence to support a competency-based assessment instrument that could be used by residency programs to evaluate resident achievement of the competencies, regardless of specialty area.

METHODS

Employing the modified Delphi method, a residency education work group developed an evaluation instrument that included 7 DoC and 31 associated competencies with 6 milestones as rating scales for each competency. The instrument was distributed to mentors and residents in accredited physical therapist residency programs to establish validity evidence. Evaluations (measured by milestones) and demographics were collected at 3 time points (program entry, midterm, and final). Scores across these time points were compared using Kruskal-Wallis tests. Reliability was assessed with kappa statistics (interrater reliability) and alpha reliability coefficients (internal consistency). Construct validity was examined using confirmatory factor analysis via structural equation modeling.

RESULTS

Overall, 237 mentors and 228 residents completed 824 evaluations (460 by mentors and 364 resident self-evaluations) across the time points. Scores significantly increased from entry through final time points. The interrater reliability of the associated behaviors ranged from moderate to substantial agreement (κ = 0.417-0.774). The internal consistency was high for all DoC at every time point (α reliability coefficients = .881-.955 for entry, .857-.925 for midterm, and .824-.902 for final). After confirmatory factor analysis with structural equation modeling was performed, a model that included 7 DoC and 20 associated competencies was proposed.

CONCLUSIONS

The residency assessment instrument developed demonstrates interrater reliability and validity evidence and therefore supports competency-based assessment of resident clinical performance across specialty areas. Additionally, the instrument aligns the physical therapy profession with other professions, such as medicine, dentistry, and pharmacy, that have transitioned to competency-based education.

IMPACT

This study outlines the benefits of moving to competency-based education for physical therapist residents, using a sound evaluation tool that evaluates residents across specialty areas. The instrument will allow for transition to competency-based education in physical therapist residency education programs.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在为物理治疗住院医师教育制定通用能力领域(DoC)及其相关能力和里程碑。这项工作旨在最终建立有效性证据,以支持一种基于能力的评估工具,该工具可被住院医师计划用于评估住院医师在各个专业领域的能力水平。

方法

采用改良 Delphi 法,住院医师教育工作组制定了一种评估工具,该工具包括 7 个能力领域和 31 个相关能力,以及每个能力的 6 个里程碑作为评分量表。该工具分发给认可的物理治疗住院医师教育计划的导师和住院医师,以建立有效性证据。在 3 个时间点(项目开始、中期和最终)收集评估(以里程碑衡量)和人口统计学数据。使用 Kruskal-Wallis 检验比较这些时间点的分数。使用kappa 统计量(评分者间可靠性)和 alpha 可靠性系数(内部一致性)评估可靠性。使用结构方程建模的验证性因子分析来检验结构有效性。

结果

总体而言,237 名导师和 228 名住院医师在所有时间点完成了 824 次评估(460 次由导师进行,364 次由住院医师自我评估)。分数从开始到最终显著增加。相关行为的评分者间一致性从中等到高度一致(κ=0.417-0.774)。在每个时间点,所有能力领域的内部一致性都很高(α可靠性系数在开始时为.881-.955,中期为.857-.925,最终为.824-.902)。在进行结构方程建模的验证性因子分析后,提出了一个包含 7 个能力领域和 20 个相关能力的模型。

结论

所开发的住院医师评估工具具有评分者间可靠性和有效性证据,因此支持跨专业领域的基于能力的住院医师临床表现评估。此外,该工具使物理治疗专业与医学、牙科和药学等已过渡到基于能力的教育的其他专业保持一致。

影响

本研究概述了物理治疗住院医师向基于能力的教育转变的好处,使用了一种评估住院医师在各个专业领域的能力的健全评估工具。该工具将允许物理治疗住院医师教育计划过渡到基于能力的教育。

相似文献

1
Physical Therapist Residency Competency-Based Education: Development of an Assessment Instrument.物理治疗师住院医师以能力为基础的教育:评估工具的开发。
Phys Ther. 2022 May 5;102(5). doi: 10.1093/ptj/pzac019.
2
Initial performance of a modified milestones global evaluation tool for semiannual evaluation of residents by faculty.教员对半年度住院医师评估的改良里程碑全球评估工具的初步表现。
J Surg Educ. 2013 Nov-Dec;70(6):739-49. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2013.08.004.
3
Using the ACGME Milestones for Resident Self-Evaluation and Faculty Engagement.使用美国研究生医学教育认证委员会住院医师自我评估和教员参与度的里程碑标准。
J Surg Educ. 2016 Nov-Dec;73(6):e150-e157. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2016.09.001.
4
Initial Validity Analysis of the Emergency Medicine Milestones.急诊医学里程碑的初始效度分析
Acad Emerg Med. 2015 Jul;22(7):838-44. doi: 10.1111/acem.12697. Epub 2015 Jun 25.
5
Direct Observation Assessment of Milestones: Problems with Reliability.里程碑的直接观察评估:可靠性问题。
West J Emerg Med. 2015 Nov;16(6):871-6. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2015.9.27270. Epub 2015 Oct 22.
6
The Internal Medicine Reporting Milestones: Cross-sectional Description of Initial Implementation in U.S. Residency Programs.内科报告里程碑:美国住院医师培训项目初步实施的横断面描述。
Ann Intern Med. 2016 Sep 6;165(5):356-62. doi: 10.7326/M15-2411. Epub 2016 May 10.
7
A Multicenter Prospective Comparison of the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education Milestones: Clinical Competency Committee vs. Resident Self-Assessment.毕业后医学教育认证委员会里程碑的多中心前瞻性比较:临床能力委员会与住院医师自我评估
J Surg Educ. 2017 Nov-Dec;74(6):e8-e14. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2017.06.009. Epub 2017 Jun 27.
8
Milestone Learning Trajectories of Residents at Five Anesthesiology Residency Programs.住院医师在五个麻醉学住院医师培训计划中的里程碑式学习轨迹。
Teach Learn Med. 2021 Jun-Jul;33(3):304-313. doi: 10.1080/10401334.2020.1842210. Epub 2020 Dec 17.
9
Evaluating the utility, reliability, and validity of a resident performance evaluation instrument.评估住院医师绩效评估工具的效用、可靠性和有效性。
Acad Psychiatry. 2014 Aug;38(4):458-63. doi: 10.1007/s40596-014-0134-7. Epub 2014 May 2.
10
Do Attending Surgeons and Residents See Eye To Eye? An Evaluation of the Accreditation Council For Graduate Medical Education Milestones in General Surgery Residency.主治外科医生和住院医生意见一致吗?对毕业后医学教育认证委员会普通外科住院医师培训里程碑的评估。
J Surg Educ. 2016 Nov-Dec;73(6):e54-e58. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2016.07.004. Epub 2016 Aug 23.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparing physical therapist clinical specialists to experienced nonspecialists on physical activity education for patients with heart failure: A modified retrospective cohort study.比较物理治疗师临床专家与经验丰富的非专家针对心力衰竭患者进行体育活动教育的情况:一项改良的回顾性队列研究。
Health Sci Rep. 2024 Aug 13;7(8):e2307. doi: 10.1002/hsr2.2307. eCollection 2024 Aug.
2
Transformation of Mandatory Physiotherapy Internship into A Structured Competency-Based Program: A Pilot Study.将强制性物理治疗实习转变为基于能力的结构化项目:一项试点研究。
J Adv Med Educ Prof. 2024 Apr 1;12(2):95-101. doi: 10.30476/JAMP.2023.100254.1886. eCollection 2024 Apr.
3
Competency-based medical education and the McNamara fallacy: Assessing the important or making the assessed important?
基于能力的医学教育与麦克纳马拉谬误:评估重要之事还是使被评估之事变得重要?
J Postgrad Med. 2023 Apr-Jun;69(2):122-123. doi: 10.4103/jpgm.jpgm_828_22.