Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes, Metabolism, and Nutrition, Department of Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Robert D. and Patricia E. Kern Center for the Science of Health Care Delivery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
JAMA Intern Med. 2022 Apr 1;182(4):418-425. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2022.0045.
Switching among generic levothyroxine sodium products made by different manufacturers typically occurs at the pharmacy and may affect serum thyrotropin (TSH) levels.
To compare TSH levels between patients who continued taking the same sourced generic levothyroxine product and those who switched.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This comparative effectiveness research study with 1:1 propensity matching used data from OptumLabs Data Warehouse, a national administrative claims database linked to laboratory test results. Adults aged 18 years or older were included if they filled a generic levothyroxine prescription between January 1, 2008, and June 30, 2019, and had a stable drug dose, the same drug manufacturer, and a normal TSH level (0.3-4.4 mIU/L) for at least 3 months before either continuing to take the same product or switching among generic levothyroxine products (index date). Patients were excluded if they were pregnant, had diagnosed hypopituitarism or hyperthyroidism, or had a medical condition or used medications that could affect thyrotropin levels. They were also excluded if they filled a prescription for other forms of thyroid replacement therapy between 6 months before the index date and when the first TSH level was obtained 6 weeks to 12 months after the index date. Data were analyzed from December 1, 2019, to November 24, 2021.
Proportion of individuals with a normal (0.3-4.4 mIU/L) or markedly abnormal (<0.1 or >10.0 mIU/L) TSH level using the first available laboratory result 6 weeks to 12 months after the index date. A propensity score model was developed to minimize confounding using logistic regression with the binary outcome of continuing the same sourced levothyroxine product vs switching generic levothyroxine. Covariates were demographics, comorbidities, and baseline TSH level. The balance among the treatment groups was evaluated by comparing standardized mean differences of baseline covariates between the groups.
A total of 15 829 patients filled generic levothyroxine (mean [SD] age, 58.9 [14.6] years; 73.4% [11 624] were women; 4.5% [705] were Asian, 10.2% [1617] were Black, 11.4% [1801] were Hispanic, and 71.4% [11 295] were White individuals); of these patients, 56.3% [8905] received a daily levothyroxine dose of 50 μg or less. A total of 13 049 patients (82.4%) continued taking the same sourced preparation, and 2780 (17.6%) switched among generic levothyroxine preparations. Among 2780 propensity-matched patient pairs, the proportion of patients with a normal TSH level after the index date was 82.7% (2298) among nonswitchers and 84.5% (2348) among switchers (risk difference, -0.018; 95% CI, -0.038 to 0.002; P = .07). The proportion of patients with a markedly abnormal TSH level after the index date was 3.1% (87) among nonswitchers and 2.5% (69) among switchers (risk difference, 0.007; 95% CI, -0.002 to 0.015; P = .14). The mean (SD) TSH levels after the index date were 2.7 (2.3) mIU/L among nonswitchers and 2.7 (3.3) mIU/L among switchers (P = .94).
Results of this comparative effectiveness research study suggest that switching among different generic levothyroxine products was not associated with clinically significant changes in TSH level. These findings conflict with the current guideline recommendation that warns clinicians about potential changes in TSH level associated with switching among levothyroxine products sourced from different manufacturers.
不同制造商生产的通用左甲状腺素钠产品之间的转换通常发生在药房,可能会影响血清促甲状腺激素(TSH)水平。
比较继续服用相同来源的通用左甲状腺素产品的患者和转换产品的患者之间的 TSH 水平。
设计、环境和参与者:这项具有 1:1 倾向匹配的比较有效性研究使用了 OptumLabs 数据仓库的数据,这是一个全国性的行政索赔数据库,与实验室检测结果相关联。纳入年龄在 18 岁或以上的成年人,他们在 2008 年 1 月 1 日至 2019 年 6 月 30 日期间开了通用左甲状腺素处方,并且有稳定的药物剂量、相同的药物制造商和至少 3 个月的正常 TSH 水平(0.3-4.4 mIU/L),在此之前,他们要么继续服用相同的产品,要么在不同的通用左甲状腺素产品之间转换(索引日期)。如果患者怀孕、患有垂体功能减退症或甲状腺功能亢进症、有影响促甲状腺激素水平的医疗状况或使用药物,或者在索引日期前 6 个月至首次获得 TSH 水平的 6 至 12 个月之间开了其他形式的甲状腺替代疗法处方,则将其排除在外。数据于 2019 年 12 月 1 日至 2021 年 11 月 24 日进行分析。
使用首次获得的实验室结果在索引日期后 6 至 12 周内,正常(0.3-4.4 mIU/L)或明显异常(<0.1 或 >10.0 mIU/L)TSH 水平的个体比例。使用二项结果(继续使用相同来源的左甲状腺素产品与转换通用左甲状腺素)的逻辑回归建立倾向评分模型,以最小化混杂因素。协变量为人口统计学、合并症和基线 TSH 水平。通过比较两组之间基线协变量的标准化平均差异来评估治疗组之间的平衡。
共有 15829 名患者服用了通用左甲状腺素(平均[标准差]年龄,58.9[14.6]岁;73.4%[11624]为女性;4.5%[705]为亚洲人,10.2%[1617]为黑人,11.4%[1801]为西班牙裔,71.4%[11295]为白人个体);其中 56.3%[8905]的患者每天服用 50 μg 或更少的左甲状腺素剂量。共有 13049 名患者(82.4%)继续服用相同来源的制剂,2780 名患者(17.6%)在通用左甲状腺素制剂之间转换。在 2780 对匹配的患者中,在索引日期后 TSH 水平正常的患者比例在未转换组中为 82.7%(2298 例),在转换组中为 84.5%(2348 例)(风险差异,-0.018;95%置信区间,-0.038 至 0.002;P=0.07)。在索引日期后 TSH 水平明显异常的患者比例在未转换组中为 3.1%(87 例),在转换组中为 2.5%(69 例)(风险差异,0.007;95%置信区间,-0.002 至 0.015;P=0.14)。索引日期后 TSH 水平的平均(标准差)分别为 2.7(2.3)mIU/L 和 2.7(3.3)mIU/L(P=0.94)。
这项比较有效性研究的结果表明,在不同的通用左甲状腺素产品之间转换不会导致 TSH 水平发生临床显著变化。这些发现与当前指南建议相冲突,该建议警告临床医生注意与不同制造商来源的左甲状腺素产品转换相关的 TSH 水平变化。