• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

前双侧骶棘韧带固定联合前侧固有组织修复:一项初步研究。

Anterior bilateral sacrospinous ligament fixation with concomitant anterior native tissue repair: a pilot study.

机构信息

Urogynecology Unit, Nimes University Hospital, Nimes, France.

Urogynecology Unit, GHOL Group, Nyon Hospital, Nyon, Switzerland.

出版信息

Int Urogynecol J. 2022 Dec;33(12):3519-3527. doi: 10.1007/s00192-022-05092-x. Epub 2022 Feb 28.

DOI:10.1007/s00192-022-05092-x
PMID:35226145
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8883458/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS

Anterior bilateral sacrospinous ligament fixation (ABSSLF) was first described in 2000 but only evaluated in a limited number of studies. However, due to the FDA's ban on transvaginal mesh, interest in this technique has re-emerged. The SSLF procedure is known for its inherent high risk for anterior compartment failure; hence, in our center we started performing a preemptive concomitant anterior repair with the intention to reduce such risk. The aim of this study was to review the feasibility and clinical outcomes of this innovative technique.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective cohort study of all the women who had an ABSSLF and a concomitant anterior native tissue repair between May 2019 and July 2020 in a tertiary hospital in France. Our primary endpoint was surgical feasibility, while as secondary endpoints we wanted to explore the perioperative morbidities and clinical outcomes associated with this technique.

RESULTS

A total of 50 women were operated on in the studied period. The median follow-up time was 10 [8.5] months. It was feasible to perform the combined ABSSLF and concomitant anterior native tissue repair in all cases. The most frequent perioperative complications reported were urinary tract infection (14%) and difficulty in resuming voiding (16%). Anatomical and functional results were improved. The rate of anterior compartment recurrence was 37%.

CONCLUSIONS

ABSSLF with a concomitant anterior native tissue repair is feasible and relatively safe for treating anterior and apical pelvic prolapse. However, anterior compartment failure rate is still a limitation. Further larger studies with long-term anatomical and functional results comparing this technique to alternative transvaginal surgical approaches are needed.

摘要

引言和假设

前双侧骶棘韧带固定术(ABSSLF)于 2000 年首次描述,但仅在有限数量的研究中进行了评估。然而,由于 FDA 禁止使用阴道网片,人们对这项技术重新产生了兴趣。SSL 固定术以其前盆腔失败的固有高风险而闻名;因此,在我们中心,我们开始进行预防性同期前修补术,以降低这种风险。本研究旨在回顾这种创新技术的可行性和临床结果。

方法

我们对 2019 年 5 月至 2020 年 7 月在法国一家三级医院接受 ABSSLF 和同期前固有组织修复的所有女性进行了回顾性队列研究。我们的主要终点是手术可行性,次要终点是探讨与该技术相关的围手术期并发症和临床结果。

结果

研究期间共有 50 名女性接受了手术。中位随访时间为 10 [8.5] 个月。所有病例均可行联合 ABSSLF 和同期前固有组织修复。报告的最常见围手术期并发症是尿路感染(14%)和排尿困难(16%)。解剖和功能结果得到改善。前盆腔复发率为 37%。

结论

ABSSLF 联合同期前固有组织修复治疗前盆腔和顶盆腔脱垂是可行且相对安全的。然而,前盆腔失败率仍然是一个限制。需要进一步开展更大规模的研究,以比较该技术与替代阴道手术方法的长期解剖和功能结果。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3384/8883458/24d9e8604f83/192_2022_5092_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3384/8883458/24d9e8604f83/192_2022_5092_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3384/8883458/24d9e8604f83/192_2022_5092_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Anterior bilateral sacrospinous ligament fixation with concomitant anterior native tissue repair: a pilot study.前双侧骶棘韧带固定联合前侧固有组织修复:一项初步研究。
Int Urogynecol J. 2022 Dec;33(12):3519-3527. doi: 10.1007/s00192-022-05092-x. Epub 2022 Feb 28.
2
[A five-year analysis of effect on transvaginal high uterosacral ligament suspension with or without native-tissue repair for middle compartment defect].[对有或无自体组织修复的经阴道高位子宫骶韧带悬吊术治疗中盆腔缺陷效果的五年分析]
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 2019 Jul 25;54(7):445-451. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0529-567x.2019.07.003.
3
Surgical management of pelvic organ prolapse in women.女性盆腔器官脱垂的外科治疗
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Apr 30(4):CD004014. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004014.pub5.
4
[Effectiveness of vaginal high uterosacral ligament suspension for treatment of recurrent pelvic organ prolapse].阴道高位子宫骶韧带悬吊术治疗复发性盆腔器官脱垂的疗效
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 2019 Apr 25;54(4):232-238. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0529-567x.2019.04.004.
5
Long-term reoperation risk after apical prolapse repair in female pelvic reconstructive surgery.女性盆底重建术后穹窿脱垂修补的长期再手术风险。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2022 Aug;227(2):306.e1-306.e16. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2022.05.046. Epub 2022 May 30.
6
Combined anterior vaginal wall mesh with sacrospinous ligament fixation or with posterior intravaginal slingplasty for uterovaginal or vaginal vault prolapse.经阴道前壁网片联合骶棘韧带固定术或阴道后壁网片修补术治疗子宫阴道或阴道穹窿脱垂。
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2011 Aug;157(2):230-3. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2011.03.031. Epub 2011 May 10.
7
Laparoscopic Uterosacral Ligament Hysteropexy vs Total Vaginal Hysterectomy with Uterosacral Ligament Suspension for Anterior and Apical Prolapse: Surgical Outcome and Patient Satisfaction.腹腔镜子宫骶骨韧带固定术与经阴道全子宫切除术联合子宫骶骨韧带悬吊术治疗前位和前顶脱垂:手术结果和患者满意度。
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2020 Jan;27(1):88-93. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2019.02.012. Epub 2019 Feb 22.
8
Outcomes of Transvaginal High Uterosacral Ligaments Suspension: Over 500-Patient Single-Center Study.经阴道高位子宫骶韧带悬吊术的治疗效果:超过500例患者的单中心研究
Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2018 May/Jun;24(3):203-206. doi: 10.1097/01.spv.0000533751.41539.5b.
9
Outcomes of the anterior approach versus posterior sacrospinous ligament fixation for pelvic organ prolapse.前路与后路骶棘韧带固定治疗盆腔器官脱垂的结局比较。
Int Urogynecol J. 2022 Jul;33(7):1857-1862. doi: 10.1007/s00192-022-05171-z. Epub 2022 Mar 28.
10
Effect of Uterosacral Ligament Suspension vs Sacrospinous Ligament Fixation With or Without Perioperative Behavioral Therapy for Pelvic Organ Vaginal Prolapse on Surgical Outcomes and Prolapse Symptoms at 5 Years in the OPTIMAL Randomized Clinical Trial.Uterosacral 韧带悬吊术与骶棘韧带固定术联合或不联合围手术期行为疗法治疗盆腔器官阴道脱垂 5 年的手术结果和脱垂症状的影响:OPTIMAL 随机临床试验。
JAMA. 2018 Apr 17;319(15):1554-1565. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.2827.

引用本文的文献

1
Mobility analysis of a posterior sacrospinous fixation using a finite element model of the pelvic system.利用骨盆系统的有限元模型分析后路骶棘韧带固定的活动度。
PLoS One. 2024 Mar 21;19(3):e0299012. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0299012. eCollection 2024.
2
Comparison of Early Postoperative Outcomes for Vaginal Anterior Sacrospinous Ligament Fixation with or without Transvaginal Mesh Insertion.经阴道骶棘韧带固定术加或不加经阴道网片植入术后早期结局的比较。
J Clin Med. 2023 May 25;12(11):3667. doi: 10.3390/jcm12113667.
3
Anatomical and functional outcomes after bilateral sacrospinous colposuspension (BSC) for the treatment of female genital prolapse.

本文引用的文献

1
Twice-Daily Nitrofurantoin Administration Following Short-term Transurethral Catheterization After Pelvic Reconstructive Surgery: A Randomized Clinical Trial.短期经尿道膀胱镜检查后,每日两次给予呋喃妥因:一项随机临床试验。
Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2021 Mar 1;27(3):202-207. doi: 10.1097/SPV.0000000000000977.
2
Anterior Bilateral Sacrospinous Ligament Fixation: A Safe Route for Apical Repair.前路双侧骶棘韧带固定术:尖顶修复的安全途径。
Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2020 Aug;26(8):e33-e36. doi: 10.1097/SPV.0000000000000857.
3
Long-term follow-up of 453 patients with pelvic organ prolapse who underwent transvaginal sacrospinous colpopexy with Veronikis ligature carrier.
经阴道双骶棘韧带悬吊术(BSC)治疗女性生殖道脱垂的解剖和功能结局。
BMC Urol. 2023 Mar 29;23(1):48. doi: 10.1186/s12894-023-01213-w.
4
Anterior and Apical Prolapse: Comparison of Vaginal Mesh Surgery to Vaginal Surgery with No Mesh.前位和顶端脱垂:阴道网片手术与无网片阴道手术的比较
J Clin Med. 2023 Mar 13;12(6):2212. doi: 10.3390/jcm12062212.
5
Serious Complications and Recurrence following Sacrospinous Ligament Fixation for the Correction of Apical Prolapse.用于纠正顶端脱垂的骶棘韧带固定术后的严重并发症及复发情况。
J Clin Med. 2023 Jan 6;12(2):468. doi: 10.3390/jcm12020468.
6
The Vaginal Patch Plastron Associated to the Anterior Sacrospinous Ligament Fixation for the Treatment of Advanced Anterior Vaginal Wall Prolapse.阴道补片腹甲联合骶棘前韧带固定术治疗重度阴道前壁脱垂
J Clin Med. 2022 Nov 11;11(22):6684. doi: 10.3390/jcm11226684.
7
Evaluation of the clinical effectiveness of modified sacrospinous ligament fixation the anterior vaginal wall path for pelvic organ prolapse: A feasibility report based on 50 patients.改良骶棘韧带固定术经阴道前壁路径治疗盆腔器官脱垂的临床疗效评估:基于50例患者的可行性报告
Front Surg. 2022 Nov 2;9:1010027. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.1010027. eCollection 2022.
经阴道骶棘韧带缝合载体 Veronikis 结扎固定术治疗盆腔器官脱垂 453 例患者的长期随访。
Sci Rep. 2020 Mar 19;10(1):4997. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-61995-z.
4
Quality of life and sexuality after bilateral sacrospinous fixation with vaginal hysterectomy for treatment of primary pelvic organ prolapse.经阴道子宫切除术联合双侧骶棘韧带固定术治疗原发性盆腔器官脱垂后生活质量和性生活。
Low Urin Tract Symptoms. 2020 Sep;12(3):206-210. doi: 10.1111/luts.12303. Epub 2020 Jan 31.
5
The resurrection of sacrospinous fixation: unilateral apical sling hysteropexy.骶棘固定术的复兴:单侧顶端吊带子宫固定术。
Int Urogynecol J. 2020 Feb;31(2):351-357. doi: 10.1007/s00192-019-03964-3. Epub 2019 Jun 10.
6
Comparative analysis of overall cost and rate of healthcare utilization among apical prolapse procedures.顶端脱垂手术的总体成本与医疗保健利用率的比较分析。
Int Urogynecol J. 2017 Oct;28(10):1481-1488. doi: 10.1007/s00192-017-3324-5. Epub 2017 Mar 31.
7
Sacrospinous hysteropexy: review and meta-analysis of outcomes.骶棘韧带子宫固定术:结局的综述与荟萃分析
Int Urogynecol J. 2017 Sep;28(9):1285-1294. doi: 10.1007/s00192-017-3291-x. Epub 2017 Mar 3.
8
Surgery for women with anterior compartment prolapse.前盆腔脏器脱垂女性的手术治疗
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Nov 30;11(11):CD004014. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004014.pub6.
9
Combined sacrospinous hysteropexy and cystopexy using a single anterior incision.
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2016 Oct;135(1):101-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2016.03.028. Epub 2016 Jun 16.
10
Impact of Sacrospinous Colpopexy Associated with Anterior Colporrhaphy for the Treatment of Dome Prolapse on all Three Vaginal Compartments.骶棘韧带阴道固定术联合阴道前壁修补术治疗穹窿脱垂对所有三个阴道腔室的影响
Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet. 2016 Feb;38(2):77-81. doi: 10.1055/s-0035-1571264. Epub 2016 Feb 1.