• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Combined sacrospinous hysteropexy and cystopexy using a single anterior incision.

作者信息

Petruzzelli Paolo, Chiadò Fiorio Tin Michela, Cosma Stefano, Parisi Silvia, Garofalo Anna, Todros Tullia

机构信息

Gynecology and Obstetrics, Department of Surgical Sciences, City of Health and Science, University of Torino, Torino, Italy.

Gynecology and Obstetrics, Department of Surgical Sciences, City of Health and Science, University of Torino, Torino, Italy.

出版信息

Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2016 Oct;135(1):101-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2016.03.028. Epub 2016 Jun 16.

DOI:10.1016/j.ijgo.2016.03.028
PMID:27352736
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the safety, efficacy, and feasibility of a minimally invasive vaginal approach for treating advanced utero-vaginal prolapse.

METHODS

A prospective study enrolled consecutive patients attending the Gynecology and Obstetrics Department, Turin University for treatment of Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification (POP-Q) stage III of higher symptomatic utero-vaginal prolapse between February 1, 2013 and November 30, 2014. Participants underwent a combined sacrospinous hysteropexy and cystopexy procedure using a single anterior vaginal incision. Surgical procedures were performed by one of two surgeons, either an experienced senior surgeon or a resident surgeon under supervision. POP-Q staging, patient symptoms, and quality of life were evaluated before and after surgery.

RESULTS

The present study enrolled 42 patients and 19 (45%) were discharged on the first post-operative day. The mean operating time was 40.5±10.6minutes and there was no significant difference in operating time between the two surgeons. With an average follow-up duration of 13months, significant post-surgical improvements were recorded across both POP-Q anterior (P<0.001) and apical (P<0.001) domains, and in both prolapse impact (P<0.001) and urinary impact (P=0.001) quality-of-life measures; one apical recurrence and no major complications were recorded.

CONCLUSIONS

Combined sacrospinous hysteropexy and cystopexy through a single incision appears to be a safe and efficacious procedure that was relatively easy for surgeons to learn and resulted in a fast post-surgical recovery.

摘要

相似文献

1
Combined sacrospinous hysteropexy and cystopexy using a single anterior incision.
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2016 Oct;135(1):101-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2016.03.028. Epub 2016 Jun 16.
2
Sacrospinous hysteropexy versus vaginal hysterectomy with suspension of the uterosacral ligaments in women with uterine prolapse stage 2 or higher: multicentre randomised non-inferiority trial.骶棘韧带子宫固定术与子宫骶骨韧带悬吊的阴道子宫切除术治疗2期及以上子宫脱垂女性的多中心随机非劣效性试验
BMJ. 2015 Jul 23;351:h3717. doi: 10.1136/bmj.h3717.
3
The Impact of Sacrospinous Hysteropexy and Vaginal Hysterectomy With Suspension of the Uterosacral Ligaments on Sexual Function in Women With Uterine Prolapse: A Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Comparative Study.骶棘韧带子宫固定术及阴道子宫切除术联合子宫骶韧带悬吊术对子宫脱垂女性性功能的影响:一项随机对照研究的二次分析
J Sex Med. 2016 Feb;13(2):213-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jsxm.2015.12.006. Epub 2016 Jan 21.
4
Sacrospinous hysteropexy versus vaginal hysterectomy with uterosacral ligament suspension in women with uterine prolapse stage 2 or higher: observational follow-up of a multicentre randomised trial.骶棘韧带固定术与阴道子宫切除术联合子宫骶骨韧带悬吊术治疗 2 度或以上子宫脱垂的疗效比较:多中心随机试验的随访观察。
BMJ. 2019 Sep 10;366:l5149. doi: 10.1136/bmj.l5149.
5
Hysteropexy in the treatment of uterine prolapse stage 2 or higher: a multicenter randomized controlled non-inferiority trial comparing laparoscopic sacrohysteropexy with vaginal sacrospinous hysteropexy (LAVA-trial, study protocol).子宫托治疗2期及以上子宫脱垂:一项比较腹腔镜骶骨子宫固定术与阴道骶棘韧带子宫固定术的多中心随机对照非劣效性试验(LAVA试验,研究方案)
BMC Womens Health. 2014 Sep 17;14:112. doi: 10.1186/1472-6874-14-112.
6
[Comparison outcomes of three surgical procedures in treatment of severe pelvic organ prolapse and analysis of risk factors for genital prolapse recurrence].[三种手术治疗重度盆腔器官脱垂的比较结果及生殖器脱垂复发危险因素分析]
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 2011 Feb;46(2):94-100.
7
Evaluation of two vaginal, uterus sparing operations for pelvic organ prolapse: modified Manchester operation (MM) and sacrospinous hysteropexy (SSH), a study protocol for a multicentre randomized non-inferiority trial (the SAM study).两种保留阴道和子宫的盆腔器官脱垂手术的评估:改良曼彻斯特手术(MM)和骶棘韧带子宫固定术(SSH),一项多中心随机非劣效性试验的研究方案(SAM研究)
BMC Womens Health. 2019 Apr 2;19(1):49. doi: 10.1186/s12905-019-0749-7.
8
Effect of sacrospinous hysteropexy with graft vs vaginal hysterectomy with uterosacral ligament suspension on treatment failure in women with uterovaginal prolapse: 5-year results of a randomized clinical trial.骶棘韧带固定术联合移植物与阴道子宫切除术联合子宫骶骨韧带悬吊术治疗女性阴道前壁膨出的疗效比较:一项随机临床试验的 5 年结果。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2021 Aug;225(2):153.e1-153.e31. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2021.03.012. Epub 2021 Mar 12.
9
Vaginal reconstructive surgery for severe pelvic organ prolapses: a 'uterine-sparing' technique using polypropylene prostheses.严重盆腔器官脱垂的阴道重建手术:一种使用聚丙烯假体的“保留子宫”技术。
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2008 Aug;139(2):245-51. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2008.01.013. Epub 2008 Mar 5.
10
Vaginal and laparoscopic mesh hysteropexy for uterovaginal prolapse: a parallel cohort study.阴道和腹腔镜网状子宫固定术治疗子宫阴道脱垂:一项平行队列研究。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Jan;216(1):38.e1-38.e11. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2016.08.035. Epub 2016 Sep 3.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison of Early Postoperative Outcomes for Vaginal Anterior Sacrospinous Ligament Fixation with or without Transvaginal Mesh Insertion.经阴道骶棘韧带固定术加或不加经阴道网片植入术后早期结局的比较。
J Clin Med. 2023 May 25;12(11):3667. doi: 10.3390/jcm12113667.
2
Anterior and Apical Prolapse: Comparison of Vaginal Mesh Surgery to Vaginal Surgery with No Mesh.前位和顶端脱垂:阴道网片手术与无网片阴道手术的比较
J Clin Med. 2023 Mar 13;12(6):2212. doi: 10.3390/jcm12062212.
3
Anterior bilateral sacrospinous ligament fixation with concomitant anterior native tissue repair: a pilot study.
前双侧骶棘韧带固定联合前侧固有组织修复:一项初步研究。
Int Urogynecol J. 2022 Dec;33(12):3519-3527. doi: 10.1007/s00192-022-05092-x. Epub 2022 Feb 28.