Haffajee A D, Socransky S S
J Clin Periodontol. 1986 May;13(5):461-75. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-051x.1986.tb01491.x.
The present communication attempts to summarize some of the features of attachment loss which are of interest to the clinician and the statistician analyzing data from clinical trials. These include the measurements employed to detect changes in attachment level, the nature of the destructive disease process and the effects of therapy on the attachment level measurements. Although there are several difficulties associated with the attachment level measurement, at the present time it appears to be the best estimator of periodontal attachment available. The overall standard deviation of this measurement in greater than 46,000 replicate measurements at periodontal sites in 58 subjects was 0.78 mm (range 0.4 to 1.2 mm). In the periodontally healthy subject, the length of the attachment measured around 28 teeth is approximately 700 mm. Therefore, there are approximately 1400 adjacent points along the periodontal attachment where a measurement could be made using a periodontal probe with a 0.5 mm diameter tip. If 6 measurements were recorded per tooth, then approximately 12% of the possible probable points would be evaluated. Recent data indicate that destructive periodontal diseases progress with acute bursts of activity rather than as slowly progressive, continual processes. Such findings suggest new models of attachment loss progression. In one likely model, destructive periodontal diseases would progress by asynchronous bursts of activity at individual sites which occur with greater frequency during a finite period of time in an individual's life. 3 major patterns of attachment loss could be distinguished when frequency distributions of attachment level measurements were constructed for 61 destructive periodontal disease subjects. Pattern I (30 subjects) exhibited a bimodal distribution with localized destruction occurring at less than 34% of sites. Pattern II (14 subjects) exhibited more widespread disease (greater than 33% of sites affected) with a trimodal frequency distribution. Pattern III (17 subjects) exhibited a unimodal distribution in which virtually all sites were affected. The proportions of Fusobacterium nucleatum, Streptococcus intermedius and Eikenella corrodens in subgingival plaque samples were significantly elevated in sites of subjects with patterns II and III (the widespread disease groups). Bacteroides intermedius, Streptococcus uberis and Actinobacillus actinomycetemcomitans were elevated in sampled sites of localized disease subjects (pattern I). The effects of therapy by Widman flap surgery and systemic tetracycline were examined by several statistical analyses.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)
本通讯旨在总结附着丧失的一些特征,这些特征对于临床医生和分析临床试验数据的统计学家而言颇具意义。其中包括用于检测附着水平变化的测量方法、破坏性疾病进程的性质以及治疗对附着水平测量的影响。尽管附着水平测量存在若干困难,但目前它似乎是现有的牙周附着情况的最佳评估指标。在对58名受试者牙周部位进行的超过46,000次重复测量中,该测量的总体标准差为0.78毫米(范围为0.4至1.2毫米)。在牙周健康的受试者中,围绕28颗牙齿测量的附着长度约为700毫米。因此,沿着牙周附着大约有1400个相邻点,可使用直径为0.5毫米尖端的牙周探针进行测量。如果每颗牙齿记录6次测量值,那么大约会评估12%的可能测量点。近期数据表明,破坏性牙周疾病以急性发作的方式进展,而非缓慢渐进的持续过程。这些发现提示了附着丧失进展的新模式。在一种可能的模式中,破坏性牙周疾病会通过各个部位的异步发作在个体生命中的有限时间段内更频繁地发生。当为61名患有破坏性牙周疾病的受试者构建附着水平测量的频率分布时,可以区分出3种主要的附着丧失模式。模式I(30名受试者)呈现双峰分布,局部破坏发生在不到34%的部位。模式II(14名受试者)表现出更广泛的疾病(超过33%的部位受影响),具有三峰频率分布。模式III(17名受试者)呈现单峰分布,几乎所有部位都受到影响。在模式II和III(广泛疾病组)受试者的部位,龈下菌斑样本中具核梭杆菌、中间链球菌和腐蚀艾肯菌的比例显著升高。在局部疾病受试者(模式I)的采样部位,中间拟杆菌、乳房链球菌和伴放线放线杆菌有所增加。通过多种统计分析研究了改良Widman翻瓣术和全身应用四环素治疗的效果。(摘要截选至400字)