Departments of Laboratory Animal Resources, Bethesda, MD;, Email:
Departments of Laboratory Animal Resources, Silver Spring, MD.
J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci. 2022 May 1;61(3):296-303. doi: 10.30802/AALAS-JAALAS-21-000110. Epub 2022 Feb 28.
Rabbits are frequently used as surgical models in research. However, studies assessing the effects of various hair removal methods on wound healing and surgical site infection (SSI) in rabbits are sparse. Here we evaluated the effects of 2 hair removal methods-clipping with electric clippers and using a commercial depilatory agent-on wound healing and SSI as assessed via wound scoring and histology. Incisions were assigned ASEPSIS scores on days 3 and 7. To assess whether the hair removal methods influenced aseptic preparation, swabs for bacterial culture were obtained just after hair removal on day 0, after aseptic skin preparation on day 0, and on day 1. For histopathologic assessment, full-thickness punch biopsies were obtained on days 0, 1, 3, 7, and 21. Histopathology revealed significant differences between the 2 methods, with the depilatory method having consistently higher scores (that is, more abnormalities). We conclude that for a surgical preparation regimen, clipping is safer, more efficacious, and less traumatic to tissues in rabbits.
兔子经常被用作外科研究的模型。然而,评估各种脱毛方法对兔子伤口愈合和手术部位感染(SSI)影响的研究很少。在这里,我们评估了 2 种脱毛方法——电推剪剪毛和使用商业脱毛剂——对伤口愈合和 SSI 的影响,通过伤口评分和组织学进行评估。在第 3 天和第 7 天对切口进行 ASEPSIS 评分。为了评估脱毛方法是否影响无菌准备,在第 0 天脱毛后、第 0 天无菌皮肤准备后和第 1 天立即获取用于细菌培养的拭子。为了进行组织病理学评估,在第 0、1、3、7 和 21 天获取全层冲孔活检。组织病理学显示这 2 种方法之间存在显著差异,脱毛方法的评分始终更高(即更多异常)。我们得出结论,对于手术准备方案,剪毛在兔子中更安全、更有效且对组织的创伤更小。